starfox wrote:
If I can fix most of my ASD related issues, does that mean I don't really have it?
Some would say so, but there is good evidence that some people adapt to the point of being subclinical, moving from an autism diagnosis to BAP.
starfox wrote:
Or that I have adapted?
This seems a likely explanation to a reduction in severity of symptoms, if there is no Dunning-Kruger effect at work.
starfox wrote:
Or that even people with more severe impairments than me could fix issues with a lot of effort?
Your experience cannot be extrapolated in such a way. Some change is possible for some people with autism. More than that cannot be said on the basis of that observation. To do so is no more rational than concluding that all people with autism will have a severe decline and increase in severity of symptoms because some people do.
starfox wrote:
I think since the brain has plasticity I could do almost anything I put my mind to.
"Almost anything" could mean a lot. This seems unlikely. Could you develop Savant abilities by trying hard? Doubtful. How about the kind of hand-eye coordination and motor neuron responsiveness of a top Formula One driver like Lewis Hamilton or Sebastian Vettel? If you tried really hard, could you learn the split second braking, gear-shifting and acceleration those drivers display? I think not.
starfox wrote:
At the same time though if I actually succeed would it mean I was never on the spectrum?
Since a very few people with thoroughly documented diagnoses have then lost their diagnosis, success in the goal of losing diagnosable symtoms would not necessarily mean that you had never been autistic. But observations of such change do not support any general claim that all autistic people are capable of any particular degree of change.