spinelli wrote:
Yup. I just see and hear so many people doing as you said. I still think it's thought of as a cool trend. Those that are truly affected by autism aren't too interested by much of the "aspie" craze.
It appears to be an attention seeking device and excuse for bad behavior as you suggested. Perhaps they are NTs that just didn't make the popular crowd or sociopaths. I also hear women self dxing their husbands as "aspie" merely because they are more introverted or controlling.
Yes there are people that want an ASD label. Why?
I said those were stereotypes. Stereotyping is assuming without evidence most or all members of a group have certain characteristics. In bieng on this site since 2013 and reading numourous comment sections since that time while I have seen Aspie supremacists and excuse makers most use the label as an explanation, or to for the first time in thier life to find out there are others like them and to find out they are not inherantly charactor flawed. That the was the original intent of the people who coined and publicized the term. That the bad characteristics of some self identifying aspies have been used to
successfully tarnish an entire group of people not with one but with numourous sometimes contradictory stereotypes has been a very harmful thing.
Arguments that Aspergers was never real, just Autism, or that in the wake of revelations in the book "In a Different Key" Hans Asperger was not a person a condition should be named after, never mind identified with are valid. Stereotyping a group of people is never right.
_________________
“Self Acceptance is a process not a performance”
“You are autistic enough. And you always have been”
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.