Surf Rider wrote:
"Let me get this straight. I have two bachelor's degrees, I'm getting paid to get a PhD in physics, I've worked at NASA, I surf and have a host of talents I don't have time to tell you about, I can actually hold an intelligent conversation about most any topic, I'm generally responsible, and I get my work done. You, on the other hand, were too hung over to show up to class this morning to hand in your homework, you're going $40k in debt to get a degree in art history which will be totally useless after you graduate, you can't remember the name of the person you had sex with last night at the fraternity, and the only thing interesting about you is that you like to drink and party with your friends. And you're telling me that your behavior is normal and I'm the one with the disorder?"
...So if you drink & party you can't have talents/skills/aptitudes?
Quite an assumption on your behalf that someone having a drink the night before means they are uninteresting etc.
For all you know, they may be some of the greatest minds at the university.
Surf Rider wrote:
Those are some really messed up societal values. The irresponsible reckless partying behavior is worthless at best and destructive at worst,
Well, for some it leads to sex. Sex can be good fun.
Seems like they could, in one sense, be the sensible ones...
Surf Rider wrote:
and that's considered "normal"? While my failure to accurately read between the lines when someone made an ambiguous statement to me is a "disorder"? That seems really messed up to me.
I'm sure your diagnosis was granted on more than a failure to infer intention from ambiguity.
Two degrees and a PhD and you struggle to see that parties can be a good way of initiating casual sex?
Your post in general is patronising and filled with superiority complex.