Temple Grandin’s theories - Autistic thinking patterns

Post Reply New Topic

Autism: moving beyond labels

Terrible at maths. I see pictures when I think,but I also sometimes hear my voice.

I'm a photo-realistic thinker and I'm horrible at maths. I thought there was something wrong with me because I am horrible at math and most autistic people aren't. I got my answer reading the article. The article makes a lot of sense. Thank you for sharing it.

I´m a verbal logic thinker. I´m average at math and very good with reading, but I´m hopeless with visual perception and drawing, and I can´t visualize anything in my mind.

It's a shame that practical classes seem to be disappearing due to health and safety ridiculousness and the view that practical subjects are less important than academic subjects.

Not just less important but there is a stigma that they are for the less intelligent.

Why couldn't there be mixed cases? Or maybe there are.
My thoughts are very abstract, I can't even describe what they are. Like pure ideas. So I guess I'm a pattern thinker.
Music and math are my loves. Good. But also poetry and literature. So it doesn't really fit the "pure" pattern thinker stereotype.
The only thing I'm sure of is I'm not visual.

The school system I know seems to be very different from what you are talking about so I can't really say much here.

I wonder which one I am. I'm not very good at art or music or visual-spatial things. I like logic, and I like statistics if they have to do with things that interest me. I was good at math for most of school. But I only have a vague interest in STEM subjects; when I actually have to practice them, I find them more difficult than interesting. I'm really good at writing and grammar, and I like to read and write. I also love to use my imagination and think of ideas and characters in my head.

In my case, I could've been any nonverbal learner/thinker. From visual, to kinesthetic, to auditory, to logical, to pattern thinking, to pure abstract. I could do and think with arts, music, sciences, maths, etc.
Whether it's formal or informal imagination, thinking, feeling, intuiting, I could do it. If the orientation is internal or external, I could also do it. Even it if involves facts or fiction, I could do it too.
The only thing that's missing for me is motivation, habit, and access for several certain subjects to practice.


Just practically anything but verbal. If it involves verbal -- whether spoken or written -- I have to 'translate', and I'm translating almost constantly but never consistently.

Gained Number Post Count (1).
Lose Time (n).

Lose more time here - Updates at least once a week.

I quess I am verbal logical thinker and I do have trouble drawing(scribbling is more like it) but I ascribe it to poor fine moter skills.

I was bad at maths because the teachers never explained why I needed to know what they were teaching. I think if I'd understood the practical value of it, I think I might have had more motivation to learn.

I'm not sure what kind of thinker I am.
Sometimes when I speak I see the words in typeface in my mind, which might suggest verbal/logical, but I'm OK at drawing and I enjoy spotting patterns in music. Probably not visual, because I don't think in pictures.
So...

I think I am a pattern thinker. I used to describe my learning new things to people (such as a new task or new job) that I have a very long lag phase and then I get it and do fine. This fits with Grandin's description of pattern thinkers...it takes a lot of data to see complex patterns. It also makes it difficult for me to explain to others why I know something. Of course, if I encounter some outlier to the pattern, then I really get thrown for a loop and my anxiety takes over until I can pin it down again.