Autism facial expression meta analysis
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 39,637
Location: Long Island, New York
People with autism sometimes give ambiguous looks
Producing suitable expressions is likely to be just as important to social interaction as reading others’ faces, says lead researcher Elina Birmingham, associate professor of education at Simon Fraser University in Burnaby, Canada. “Face-to-face interactions are a two-way street,” she says.
Birmingham’s study suggests that autistic people have more trouble making spontaneous expressions than more intentional ones, hinting that studying this in artificial situations may not fully recapitulate the problem.
New technologies could help researchers measure expressions in real-life social situations. In a separate study published in November, a group of researchers showed that a new computer program can accurately evaluate facial expressions in children with autism.
Birmingham and her colleagues analyzed studies published from 1981 to 2017, involving a total of 684 autistic individuals and 674 controls. The studies vary in the ways they conceptualize and measure facial expressions, says Dominic Trevisan, now a postdoctoral fellow in James McPartland’s lab at Yale University.
To deal with the variability, the team sorted the studies into seven categories according to the aspect of facial expression measured — such as how long a smile lasts or how big it is.
The analysis supports the view that people with autism are less expressive than controls. They make expressions less often and fleetingly; they are also less likely to unconsciously mimic others’ looks or to use their expressions to smooth social interactions. What’s more, others are relatively likely to judge the facial expressions they do make as odd or difficult to interpret.
However, people with autism produce smiles and frowns of similar intensity and size to those of controls, and they also make grimaces and other expressions equally quickly in response to stimuli such as strong odors. The work appeared in the December issue of Autism Research.
The older the autistic participants in a study, the smaller the differences between them and controls. The differences are also smaller when they have an intelligence quotient (IQ) in the normal range rather than one that is low.
The differences are greatest for spontaneous expressions, rather than those that participants are prompted to make.
Facial expressions are difficult to measure objectively. One new strategy uses machine learning to train a computer to recognize key muscle movements involved in facial expressions. The system is more accurate than autism experts at analyzing facial expressions in children with autism. For example, it can assess whether an expression clearly conveys the intended emotion. The findings were published 16 November in Sensors.
_________________
“Self Acceptance is a process not a performance”
“You are autistic enough. And you always have been”
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.
Possibly interesting, but as a meta-analysis, there will be exceptionally poor matching between experimentals and controls. First thing that occurred to me: Did they match all participants for depression, PTSD, CAPD, and other conditions that influence responsiveness?
_________________
There Are Four Lights!
Hmm another way I’m different and strange. My face makes spontaneous expressions on it’s own all the time, even when I’m sitting on my own just thinking. I feel more like a cartoon character or a clown than an expressionless robot. And I’m pretty sure I copy other people’s expressions too because I usually copy their energy, the way the speak and adjust my vocabulary to suite them.
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| Having Autism |
11 Jul 2026, 11:01 pm |
| Autism influencers on IG, X, TikTok, etc. |
04 Jul 2026, 10:21 pm |
