I can be slow to learn, but when I get there I often understand the matter in remarkable depth.
I have some difficulty learning stuff I'm not naturally interested in.
I'm poor at learning in a traditional classroom or lecture-theatre setting - verbal information often goes at the wrong pace for me to follow, the teacher might not be clearly audible, their wording might not be as clear as I need it to be, there's often a demand to sit still, pay constant attention and obey other awkward commands, there's often a sense of inequality where the teacher is supposed to be somehow better than I am, the environment is often uncomfortable, the background noise might be distracting, and I might be called upon to contribute and made to feel it's my fault if their methods have failed to support my contribution enough to make it a good one. And whoever decides the subject matter has hardly ever considered what I might want to learn about, and I've usually been there because I was told to attend rather than simply invited with no pressure.
In spite of all that I was able to get a lot of 'O' levels, 3 'A' levels of rather low grade (but all set by the Oxford and Cambridge board), and a Higher National Certificate in Medical Laboratory Subjects. So I'm not exactly an academic failure, and all things considered, quite intelligent, conscientious and successful.
So I could be thought to have a degree of learning disability. It could also be thought that the later parts of the educational system I encountered had a degree of teaching disability, and one bit of evidence for that is that I performed extremely well in my first school.
In everyday life, if I do something and I see it go wrong, I don't usually do it like that again. I'm fairly good at solving practical problems, and that often requires me to study the things involved in the problem and adapt my ideas about them to accommodate new information about them. I have something of a flair for research.
I have ASD.