Kerch wrote:
I don't have much of a problem with clinical terms.
Spectrum rider sounds badass, though. Although it seems to be taken by a brand of spectrum analyzers, which apparently are devices used to measure signal frequencies which is something I just learned about.
But when I hear it, this is the kind of image that comes to
my mind:

Yes...to both points.
The phrase "spectrum riders" does sound bad-ass.
But it also sounds like it could mean some kind of scientific "spectrum analyzers".
In deejay slang there is a thing called "riding gain". Gain means "volume". "Riding gain" means having to constantly monitor the volume of the music you're playing (either on the radio, or during the cocktail hour of a party for a party dj)so the audience can both hear it, but not be annoyed by it ( and that it doesnt cause the equipment to go into the red and distort). Classical symphonic music, which can vary in volume more than typical pop music during the same piece, can be especially bad and force you to hafta "ride gain". The solution is run the music through a compressor (either an actual device, or nowadays it can be an app on a computer) that automatically makes the loud passages softer, and the soft passages louder. So you dont hafta constantly "ride gain".
Sound varies by loudness, but it also varies by pitch (frequency).
And so does other wave phenomena (like light, and radio waves), and like sound differs in frequency along a spectrum.
So "riding spectrum" could be the equivalent of "riding gain". Military may have to jump frequencies to monitor the enemy's radar emissions, or radio communications, or like that.