As part of my speech pathology program, we assess the language of children and adults who come to the clinic. I had an assessment this morning with a 9 year old who can't say "r". He'd been receiving speech therapy for several years, and there was nothing in the folder to suggest that anything other than an articulation delay might be going on. Well, five minutes after meeting this kid, my supervisor and I were like, "Wow, this kid has classic Asperger's." So while I was interviewing the mom, I asked a lot of questions about his social abilities, how he gets along with other kids, how he deals with change, etc. The mom was really closed about answering those questions- she gave vague answers and wasn't very willing to elaborate.
Now, although it's really clear the kid has Asperger's, we're not actually allowed to say those words to the mom. The best we can do apparently is to write up very thoroughly, in addition to his articulation problem, the kinds of problems we see in his social interactions. In addition, since he'll be receiving therapy at the clinic, we'll make sure the clinician works on social skills with him in addition to articulation. Isn't it dumb that we can't tell the mom he has Asperger's though? Actually, my supervisor thinks that his mom has heard the word "Asperger's" before, and that that is actually why she removed him from his previous school. His mom used the word "meltdown" in describing his reactions to frustration, and was very closed about talking about his interactions with other kids and the difficulty he has making friends, but does admit she works on social skills with him at him. This kid was bullied horribly last year and has really low self-esteem, so let's all cross our fingers that this new school will be better for him, that the skills he'll learn in therapy will be really useful for him, and that his mom will learn to accept his unique skills and needs.