Nades wrote:
Where a fact (especially about autism) is so clearly obvious that very little or even no research has been done on the subject, but people still ask for proof of this fact being a reality knowing full well that such proof doesn't exist because why would someone be dumb enough to research it?
Examples.
Is water wet?
How far can quadriplegics walk?
Does the human heart actually exist?
Do people eventually die?
(Obviously the examples aren't about autism but you get the idea)
Anyone ever get exasperated with it here?
I think that its safe to say that ...NO one can figure out what you are talking about.
Even the folks on this thread who responded in ways that indicate that they THINK they know what you are talking about - are responding with Non sequiturs to what you said.
You need to give examples- that actually have to do with autism.
Are you talking about 'tautologies'? Asserting that 'bachelors are single'. And somebody responding with 'not enough research has been done to prove that all bachelors are single' when 'being single' is part of the definition of 'bachelor'.
Maybe your issue is that folks are skeptical that 'autistics are X' when being X is part of the diagnositic criteria for autism?