ToughDiamond wrote:
At school we were supposed to work in pairs for practical chemistry, but there was an odd number of kids and I was somehow the one who ended up partnerless. So then I'd ask the teacher what to do, and he said go and join another pair. But the pairs I asked weren't happy about that, and when I did get into one they didn't keep me in the loop about what they were doing, so it was a bad experience. Don't know if it was me or them that was the problem.
I was annoyed when I got my school report and for chemistry the teacher had put that I "preferred to work alone." I've no idea what made him think that. I was always open to the idea but if I'd just been given a partner instead of being left to fix it up for myself, I don't think there'd have been a problem.
Yeah, that's total B.S., that comment on your report... especially since you never expressly said any such thing, you actually
wanted to collaborate with others!! ! I suppose this teacher was just "taking the easy way out", instead of acknowledging the
real problem, that of discrimination. If he said that you had trouble maintaining good working relations with peers, that would've been more accurate - yet it still would've kept the "blame the victim" mentality
Thus the whole basis of the more modern neurodiversity movement, that we don't have deficient social skills or are inherently disabled, but that we have unique gifts to bring to the table and so others (neurotypicals) need to be more flexible and less judgemental.
So, perhaps
today, those sort of ignorant comments on a report card are less common. One can only hope!!