No, it does not. It doesn't seem to describe much of an inner world to begin with. For that, the writing would have to be good - and I am afraid that in "Curious Incident..." it is not.
On another level, it doesn't relate to me because: 1) I think visually, in random strings of images, or non-visually and non-verbally; 2) I am mathematically challenged; 3) I notice the sensory, especially the visual details of things first and foremost, and if I were to describe certain events from my life, I would launch into extensive descriptions of how things look; 4) at age 15 I had typical metaphysical intoxication and was most likely to write something convoluted on the subject of the spiritual use of entheogens, the damage done by "the system", the difference between the soul of animals and plants, or any random ethical issue, classic indigo child style, but there was practically no way I could have pieced together a linear cohesive story about my life; 5) while I may not be sure what my emotions are and they may surface in unexpected ways, I am certainly not emotionless; 6) I express my emotions best through the way I perceive my surroundings, or through visual metaphor.