Perceptual Divide Between Asians and Americans

Page 1 of 1 [ 10 posts ] 

aspergian_mutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2004
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,510

28 Aug 2005, 12:17 pm

Hmmm, Interesting.
=====================
Study Finds Perceptual Divide Between Asians and Americans
By Randolph E. Schmid
Associated Press
posted: 22 August 2005

http://www.livescience.com/othernews/ap ... rican.html

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Asians and North Americans really do see the world differently. Shown a photograph, North American students of European background paid more attention to the object in the foreground of a scene, while students from China spent more time studying the background and taking in the whole scene, according to University of Michigan researchers.

The researchers, led by Hannah-Faye Chua and Richard Nisbett, tracked the eye movements of the students -- 25 European Americans and 27 native Chinese -- to determine where they were looking in a picture and how long they focused on a particular area.

"They literally are seeing the world differently,'' said Nisbett, who believes the differences are cultural.

"Asians live in a more socially complicated world than we do,'' he said in a telephone interview. "They have to pay more attention to others than we do. We are individualists. We can be bulls in a china shop, they can't afford it.''

The findings are reported in Tuesday's issue of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The key thing in Chinese culture is harmony, Nisbett said, while in the West the key is finding ways to get things done, paying less attention to others.

And that, he said, goes back to the ecology and economy of times thousands of years ago.

In ancient China, farmers developed a system of irrigated agriculture, Nisbett said. Rice farmers had to get along with each other to share water and make sure no one cheated.

Western attitudes, on the other hand, developed in ancient Greece where there were more people running individual farms, raising grapes and olives, and operating like individual businessmen.

So differences in perception go back at least 2,000 years, he said.

Aristotle, for example, focused on objects. A rock sank in water because it had the property of gravity, wood floated because it had the property of floating. He would not have mentioned the water. The Chinese, though, considered all actions related to the medium in which they occurred, so they understood tides and magnetism long before the West did.

Nisbett illustrated this with a test asking Japanese and Americans to look at pictures of underwater scenes and report what they saw.

The Americans would go straight for the brightest or most rapidly moving object, he said, such as three trout swimming. The Japanese were more likely to say they saw a stream, the water was green, there were rocks on the bottom and then mention the fish.

The Japanese gave 60 percent more information on the background and twice as much about the relationship between background and foreground objects as Americans, Nisbett said.

In the latest test, the researchers tracked the eye movement of the Chinese and Americans as they looked at pictures.

The Americans looked at the object in the foreground sooner -- a leopard in the jungle for example -- and they looked at it longer. The Chinese had more eye movement, especially on the background and back and forth between the main object and the background, he said.

Reinforcing the belief that the differences are cultural, he said, when Asians raised in North America were studied, they were intermediate between native Asians and European-Americans, and sometimes closer to Americans in the way they viewed scenes.

Kyle R. Cave of the University of Massachusetts at Amherst commented: "These results are particularly striking because they show that these cultural differences extend to low level perceptual processes such as how we control our eyes. They suggest that the way that we see and explore the world literally depends on where we come from.''

Cave said researchers in his lab have found differences in eye movement between Asians and Westerners in reading, based on differences in the styles of writing in each language.

"When you look beyond this study to all of the studies finding cultural differences, you find that people from one culture do better on some tasks, while people from other cultures do better on others. I think it would be hard to argue from these studies that one culture is generally outperforming the other cognitively,'' Cave said.



Anna
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 10 Dec 2004
Age: 62
Gender: Female
Posts: 255

28 Aug 2005, 12:32 pm

aspergian_mutant wrote:
Hmmm, Interesting.
=====================
Study Finds Perceptual Divide Between Asians and Americans
By Randolph E. Schmid
Associated Press
posted: 22 August 2005

http://www.livescience.com/othernews/ap ... rican.html

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Asians and North Americans really do see the world differently. Shown a photograph, North American students of European background paid more attention to the object in the foreground of a scene, while students from China spent more time studying the background and taking in the whole scene, according to University of Michigan researchers.


That is so interesting! Thanks for posting this!

Anna



hecate
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jun 2005
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,011

28 Aug 2005, 1:09 pm

i thought studies like this (racial differences) were banned after world war two? i know it's in the interest of humanity to find out how things work but does it need to be made public? in this case the topic of research seems quite harmless but you can't predict how information like this could be used in the wrong hands. did the people who took part in the experiment know that their race was being used as a factor?



BlackLiger
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Apr 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,525
Location: My Posh Leather Chair. England.

28 Aug 2005, 1:24 pm

hecate wrote:
i thought studies like this (racial differences) were banned after world war two? i know it's in the interest of humanity to find out how things work but does it need to be made public? in this case the topic of research seems quite harmless but you can't predict how information like this could be used in the wrong hands. did the people who took part in the experiment know that their race was being used as a factor?


*cough* Stanley Millgram *Cough*

No, studying differences in perception is full legal. The way you perceve the world as influenced by culture is studied an awful lot.


_________________
"Where are we going and why are we in this handbasket?"


Sophist
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Apr 2005
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,332
Location: Louisville, KY

28 Aug 2005, 3:58 pm

Fascinating! :D :D :D


_________________
My Science blog, Science Over a Cuppa - http://insolemexumbra.wordpress.com/

My partner's autism science blog, Cortical Chauvinism - http://corticalchauvinism.wordpress.com/


Namiko
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Jun 2005
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,433

28 Aug 2005, 4:49 pm

Cultural differences between Asia and the US also might have a lot to do with things like this. Even within the US, traditional Asian families are often stricter, more respectful and generally quieter than typical non-Asian American families. Since I have quite a few acquaintances who are Asian (some just ethnically, some also culturally), I have been able to observe how different families interact.

Many Asian people consider it rude not to take your shoes off when entering the household. Also, respect to the older members of the family is emphasized more than in traditional American culture. These are just some differences I've noticed over the years... :)


_________________
Itaque incipet.
All that glitters is not gold but at least it contains free electrons.


Sean
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,505

30 Aug 2005, 1:24 am

That areticle is a great explainatinon of why I rarely ever find common ground with non Americanized Asians.



Wowbagger
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 25 Jun 2004
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 135
Location: Pittsburgh

30 Aug 2005, 1:45 am

That's not the only experiment demonstrating such differences. Richard Nisbett has an entire book on the subject describing more such experiments: The Geography of Thought



Sean
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,505

30 Aug 2005, 5:09 am

hecate wrote:
i thought studies like this (racial differences) were banned after world war two? i know it's in the interest of humanity to find out how things work but does it need to be made public? in this case the topic of research seems quite harmless but you can't predict how information like this could be used in the wrong hands. did the people who took part in the experiment know that their race was being used as a factor?

It's called sociology and such studies are used to examine how a social structure works. Now if you were to give whites and Asians driving tests or vision tests to confirm or disprove stereotypes, that would be unethical.



NeantHumain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jun 2004
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,837
Location: St. Louis, Missouri

30 Aug 2005, 1:49 pm

This sounds like something to do with field independence and field dependence. People who are field independent can abstract a concept from its context and excel at noticing distinctions; they also tend to be more introverted and less likely to follow trends. Field-dependent people are more extraverted; intellectually, they are more concret and prefer a holistic approach. There seems to be a strong correlation between field in/dependence, intro/extraversion, analytical thinking/creative thinking, left/right-hemispheric cortical dominance.

Field independent


  • Intellectual
  • Introverted
  • Handles abstract concepts well
  • Attentive to distinctions and nuance in meaning and in sensory perception
  • Analytical
  • Left cortical hemisphere dominance
  • Verbally adept
  • Independent of social cues, makes own decisions
  • Overexcitabilities

Field dependent

  • Emotional
  • Extraverted
  • Holistic, concrete thinker
  • Notices similarities
  • Creative, spontaneous
  • Right cortical hemisphere dominance
  • Visual and kinesthetic ability: artistic or athletic
  • Derives identity from belonging to social group