skeeterhawk wrote:
I wonder if other folks feel the same way I do about all the times that people have told me that I am just repeating. The psychiatry and psychology professionals diss it with the word perseveration.
I know that I almost never actually repeat. I am changing my content by admittedly small but, I think, important bits. I feel that I am going through iterations of analysis or description as I work to make sense of whatever it is that I am talking about.
I can understand that the majority mind may not like this approach, despite its use in math and science, so I am prepared to keep it too myself when requested.
However, it really sticks in my craw to have people characterize it as simply repeating. It is an insult to imply that I am mindlessly talking without any direction. Perhaps I am progressing in jumps that are too small for their tastes, but it also may be true that they are jumping to conclusions by making unwarranted leaps.
Sorry for ranting a bit there but I really do wonder if this whole perseveration thing is a mistaken and hurtful description. Do other readers actually only repeat or is it more often just a detail oriented progression?
I often say the same thing in several ways that are subtly different but that subtle difference is
important, hence why I "repeat" it so often in so many different ways that all say very slightly different things. I've gotten trashed on this board even for being "too repetitive", with the fact of the "repetition" being taken as evidence I can't think properly or something. I get it elsewhere too. I don't know if that's the same thing you're talking about, but it drives me nuts to be discounted in this way.
_________________
"In my world it's a place of patterns and feel. In my world it's a haven for what is real. It's my world, nobody can steal it, but people like me, we live in the shadows." -Donna Williams