pat666rick wrote:
Aspergers is considered as being a mental condition right?
Technically, I think it's neurological.
But you've got to realise that they don't have the capacity to understand your limitations. Here's a good way of looking at it. I have a grandson who is fifteen months old, and not quite verbal. He is picking up words like gangbusters, but not to the point where he can use them to express himself beyond saying a noun that he wants or calling someone by name.
And yet all of us will try to talk to him. And when he doesn't understand us
because he doesn't have the capacity yet we try again, like
that's going to work. As he gets older, we will expect him to have control over his emotions that we did not have at his age, and punish him (which is necessary for learning of course) and get mad at him (which is, objectively, stupid and counterproductive). When he becomes a teenager, we will get mad at him when he acts like we did as teenagers, and for the same reasons.
And yet, we do not get mad at a short person for not being able to reach the top shelf. This is because we can SEE and immediately grasp the reality of their limitation. But when people talk to us, they see a person who is not stupid, and don't understand.
And it's not just them. My daughter has a lot of the same problems I do (I suspect she is also aspie, even though she's not genetically mine), and I get frustrated when she does the same things I do.
_________________
"And if I had the choice, I'd take the voice I got, 'cause it was hard to find..."
--Johnette Napolitano