blueroses wrote:
It would be good to visit the "Articles and Interviews" section on grasp.org to read the "Articles of Understanding" from a few years ago that Alex was referring to. Unfortunately, they didn't lead to much understanding. At best, we seemed to have to agree to disagree.
I think that MJC's article was good, though, and I'm happy we got the opportunity to expose Autism Speaks members to such a viewpoint. Part of me would like to see more constructive dialogue, although I don't feel it will lead too far. Obviously, it's hard to have much constructive dialogue with those who'd like to people like us not to exist.
But, I work for an agency that serves people with disabilites--all forms of disability--and I see regularly that there are a lot of other groups that are light years ahead of the autism community in terms of services and acceptance from the general public. I feel that this is in part--although not entirely because of--the fact that we fight so much internally. I don't think it was bad for GRASP to attempt some dialogue, maybe just overly idealistic.
I concur. I work for an adult service provider of people with disabilities in the backwater land of Indiana which is practically third world in their services and resources for ASD people. People still have a picture of people with autism as rainmen or people who sit in the corner and rock and drool. It's all extemely archaic. I just try to spread awareness that autism is definitely not what anyone ever pictured in their mind's eye. It's too bad that the people who get heard are the insanity ridden members of Autism Speaks. We definitely all need to do the best we can to show that autism is a spectrum and we come in all shapes, sizes, colours and functioning levels/skills.
_________________
"All those things that you taught me to fear
I've got them in my garden now
And you're not welcome here" ---Poe