UndercoverAlien wrote:
It might sound wierd but i think they do for the next things:
-Whe have post traumatic stress
-Whe oversensitive (wich may lead to huge depressions/suicidal)
-Whe almost never come outside
-lots of drugs-medication and treatments and stuff (wich can't be healthy)
and all that sort of stuff (if you can think of something extra, or prove me wrong post it please)
I don't know that it logically follows.
I have a rather large extended family, with several people on the spectrum over several generations. Those who were severely impacted (full LF autistic or seriously impaired AS-related) did die much younger than the rest of the family. One from complications of Hirschprung's Disease, one of a cerebral hemorage, one from diabetes (Type 1), and one was hit by a car. Those who seemed to be only moderately to slightly impacted lived as long as the rest - which was well into their late 80s/early 90s. And this was in an era when the typical death ages were in the mid-fiftes to mid-sixties....
I doubt most of them had any drugs - treatments weren't really available (other than being locked away for your life in an institution). Until my generation, there wasn't even antibiotics (other than sulfa powder). There were no immunizations other than for smallpox. But, then, autism was pretty much only "created" as a diagnosis in the 1940s and Aspergers' in the mid 1990s. I know of an aunt who had shock treatments, but not why. Then again, at one point they were slapping the electrodes on just about anything that moved, hoping it would help....
Some of them never did go outside, except rarely. Two of whom I'm thinking of made it to ages 88 and 86, respectively.
If I never hear the phrase "another sensitive [family name] child" again in my life I'll be fine with it. We were notorious for being "sensitive."
Some of us had/have PTSD. Not all of us did/do.