AC132 wrote:
Can you clarify the "necessary" and "ever" qualifications of the undiagnosed options in the poll?
Ah, yeah.
The criteria of AS demand an impairment in some area of your life. Most people who are impaired have a need for help and thus a need for the diagnosis. What the criteria do not take into account is that older adults may have learnt to cope with many of the disabling aspects of their AS. They would have warranted and needed a diagnosis in the past, but may not need it today anymore.
On the other hand, there are some people who consider themselves to have AS but who were never impaired due to AS. They will not need a diagnosis to learn how to cope with their differences that stem from AS.
So with my sure a bit complicated wording I wanted to divide the group of undiagnosed people:
If you have never been impaired because of AS, you don't need the diagnosis.
If you are impaired now or have been impaired in your past you still need or would have needed the diagnosis.
This
is a generalisation, but for the sake of this poll I don't care.
_________________
Autism + ADHD
______
The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it. Terry Pratchett