zghost wrote:
I was the same way. The more help and pesronalized attention I got at school, the worse I did. Yet they wouldn't stop trying. It was like the pressure made it harder or something. And my natural tendency to take as much rope as you'll give me... extentions, ect.
I did best when everyone just ignored me and let me sink or swim on my own.
Ironically, the best support I had was at home.
My family knew what was best for me academically.
In the end, I got to the point where I could work alone on educational CD Roms.
DK was fantastic for my solo, explorational, structured learning style.
We donated any surplus resources to the school afterwards.
I loved studying and solving problems on my own: it gave me such a sense of fulfillment.
I usually did fine on my own grades wise (organisation and academic wise) until I had to work with people on group projects/ socialise alone. I could never find a group or partner to work with, someone always had to allocate people for me.
Things went pretty rapidly downhill after that.
The reason why I don't actively seek help with socialising now is I'm afraid that the patronising pity brigade will descend on me just like they did last time.
It's funny how some people like zooming in on other people's weaknesses and claim that they're "incapable" oblivious to any strengths that that person might have

.
Or have the idea that if someone can't learn something in a noisy, overwhelming classroom setting by chatting to one's classmates then that automatically means that the learner is "stupid".
There's more than one way to problem solve, just like there's more than one way to learn.