pakled wrote:
assimilation can work to an extent, but it's very tiring. NT's can adjust and read on the fly; but I have to mentally examine conversations and situations consciously, which can really slow you down. It tends to make me a little conservative in my dialog....
Same... but I'm not sure it's so much assimilation as it is intelligence. In an argument almost all people I've been pitted against eventually, even online, end up either attacking my person or using dishonest technique as though trying to gain something which I don't understand even though they've either lost the argument or have no rational way to continue.
However the assimilation may come into play as an over-time concept where you can study peoples actions and take mental notes until it becomes an unconscious competence. Which is damn difficult, but extremely important if you want to last more than an hour in a normal conversation.
Of course there is never a why behind your learned actions... just a how that you need to remember.
I.E. When arguing with someone about a touchy subject and they start to become personal and defensive the key signs are that their rate of speech and physical motions become less composed and fluent. Like if two robots were boxing and one was running out of fuel and starting to malfunction. Once those things happen, or the person says something indicating that they are " offended ", it's time to stop unless you want to damage your relationship with this person. And if others are around you definitely need to stop, especially if your opinion is the minority in the group. Everyone else will silently disagree with you, and some may even join in against you, but in the end if you start dominating the argument and continue pressing on the group will assume nothing but negative things about you.
P.S. ... I think I literally just developed an understanding of that... or at least a better one, while typing it. I love ranting.