iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius
16 Sep 2011, 4:58 pm
16 Sep 2011, 5:58 pm
iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius
16 Sep 2011, 6:28 pm
richie
Supporting Member
Joined: 9 Jan 2007
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 30,142
Location: Lake Whoop-Dee-Doo, Pennsylvania
16 Sep 2011, 6:28 pm
iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius
16 Sep 2011, 6:29 pm
richie
Supporting Member
Joined: 9 Jan 2007
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 30,142
Location: Lake Whoop-Dee-Doo, Pennsylvania
16 Sep 2011, 6:31 pm
iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius
16 Sep 2011, 6:33 pm
17 Sep 2011, 4:50 am
iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius
17 Sep 2011, 9:37 am
17 Sep 2011, 10:40 am
17 Sep 2011, 2:24 pm
iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius
17 Sep 2011, 5:23 pm
18 Sep 2011, 10:19 pm
03 Oct 2011, 2:44 am
03 Oct 2011, 9:17 am
Well, actually, the Incom T-65 "X-wing" variable-foil starfighter, while popular with the forces in rebellion against the Galactic Empire, was not exclusive to their use - its popularity resulted from its relatively low cost, and the modularity of the widely-popular Incom control panel design (meaning that anyone trained on, say, an Incom T-16 skyhopper could be taught to fly an X-wing pretty quickly). The primary reason T-65s weren't flown by Imperial forces had to do with standardization, and the Emperor's rather cozy relationship with Sienar Flight Systems, makers of the TIE line of fighters and fighter-bombers.
And back on topic: Yellow dwarf stars like our Sun, one of the most common spectral types in the galaxy.
