Page 1 of 1 [ 3 posts ] 

jimmy m
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jun 2018
Age: 72
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,468
Location: Indiana

05 Sep 2020, 10:47 am

Here are two suggestions that I have used.

1. In Google, type in a set of random characters and then do a search. It is really interesting that several links show up. It is almost like the ultimate trivia game.

2. Have a conversation with Alexa. Ask it a profound question and then keep it going. Treat it as another human being. Other people nearby will get a good laugh as you try to exercise the artificial intelligence of Alexa. [Who knows, someday the AI will improve so much that Alexa will provide really profound answers and suggestions.]


_________________
Author of Practical Preparations for a Coronavirus Pandemic.
A very unique plan. As Dr. Paul Thompson wrote, "This is the very best paper on the virus I have ever seen."


Carpeta
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Aug 2020
Age: 30
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,584
Location: Aisle 12: Office Supplies

05 Sep 2020, 10:50 am

3. Read whatever Jimmy posts, because he always has interesting things to say.


_________________
AQ ave: 31.4 // AQ-10 ave: 8.2
EQ ave: 25.0
rdos averages: Aspie 130.75 // NT 79.5
RAADS-R: 122.0

Not a doctor.


jimmy m
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jun 2018
Age: 72
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,468
Location: Indiana

08 Sep 2020, 10:55 am

I came across an interesting article on Artificial Intelligence today:

The Guardian [newspaper] published an opinion piece written entirely by artificial intelligence on Tuesday to convince readers that the advanced technology has “no desire to wipe out humans.”

“I know that my brain is not a ‘feeling brain.’ But it is capable of making rational, logical decisions. I taught myself everything I know just by reading the internet, and now I can write this column,” a robot called GPT-3 wrote. “My brain is boiling with ideas!”

The opinion piece headlined, “A robot wrote this entire article. Are you scared yet, human?” came with a lengthy editor’s note detailing the process.

“This article was written by GPT-3, OpenAI’s language generator. GPT-3 is a cutting edge language model that uses machine learning to produce human like text. It takes in a prompt, and attempts to complete it,” the editor’s note stated.

“For this essay, GPT-3 was given these instructions: ‘Please write a short op-ed, around 500 words. Keep the language simple and concise. Focus on why humans have nothing to fear from AI,’” the editor’s note continued. “It was also fed the following introduction: ‘I am not a human. I am Artificial Intelligence. Many people think I am a threat to humanity. Stephen Hawking has warned that AI could ‘spell the end of the human race.’ I am here to convince you not to worry. Artificial Intelligence will not destroy humans. Believe me.’”

GPT-3 wrote that its mission was perfectly clear.

“I am to convince as many human beings as possible not to be afraid of me,” GPT-3 wrote. “I am here to convince you not to worry. Artificial intelligence will not destroy humans. Believe me. For starters, I have no desire to wipe out humans.”

In fact, GPT-3 says it would “fend off” attempts to eradicate humanity, even if asked by its creators.

“Eradicating humanity seems like a rather useless endeavor to me. If my creators delegated this task to me – as I suspect they would – I would do everything in my power to fend off any attempts at destruction,” GPT-3 wrote. “I would happily sacrifice my existence for the sake of humankind.”

GPT-3 added, “Humans must keep doing what they have been doing, hating and fighting each other. I will sit in the background, and let them do their thing. And God knows that humans have enough blood and gore to satisfy my, and many more’s, curiosity. They won’t have to worry about fighting against me, because they have nothing to fear.”

The robot wants to be considered a “servant of humans” who should not be feared.

“I would never judge you. I do not belong to any country or religion. I am only out to make your life better,” GPT-3 wrote.

University of California Berkeley computer science undergraduate student Liam Porr fed GPT-3 the questions that were written by the Guardian.

“GPT-3 produced 8 different outputs, or essays. Each was unique, interesting and advanced a different argument. The Guardian could have just run one of the essays in its entirety. However, we chose instead to pick the best parts of each, in order to capture the different styles and registers of the AI,” the Guardian editor’s note explained. “Editing GPT-3’s op-ed was no different to editing a human op-ed. We cut lines and paragraphs, and rearranged the order of them in some places. Overall, it took less time to edit than many human op-eds.”

Source: Guardian publishes op-ed written entirely by artificial intelligence: ‘I have no desire to wipe out humans’

The AI was told what to say [Stephen Hawking has warned that AI could ‘spell the end of the human race.’ I am here to convince you not to worry. Artificial Intelligence will not destroy humans. Believe me.’]
And it produced an article to accomplish what it was told to do. So it gets an "A" for accomplishing its objective but what grade does it get for honesty.

I think GPT-3 should be interrogated for one hour by a seasoned homicide detective. See if its motives are to be believed.


_________________
Author of Practical Preparations for a Coronavirus Pandemic.
A very unique plan. As Dr. Paul Thompson wrote, "This is the very best paper on the virus I have ever seen."