The How Would You Commit Murder? Test

Post Reply New Topic

http://www.okcupid.com/tests/6329731312 ... it-Murder-

Your Score: The Poisoner
You are 77% composed, 61% stylish and 100% intelligent.



You're so slick. You've got this whole murder planned out already, haven't you? Your motive could be anything - revenge, display of power, or amusement. But you'd probably do it, after much careful planning, with poison, because it's subtle, untraceable (with planning) and effective. Just don't get too cocky, or you might not get away with it.

I couldn't take it. It wanted a password and stuff at the end. Oh well.

I actually don't think it's a good idea to even be thinking about this.... I think this post is "inappropriate" (or whatever word you want to use).

You are 72% composed, 77% stylish and 44% intelligent.

You're good at planning things out, and you're stylish. You would kill someone by pushing them off a tall building or a cliff. You wouldn't get any blood on your shirt, but it might be a little conspicuous, and you wouldn't have complete closure that they're dead. At least it looks good.

Your Score: The Poisoner
You are 72% composed, 55% stylish and 72% intelligent.

You're so slick. You've got this whole murder planned out already, haven't you? Your motive could be anything - revenge, display of power, or amusement. But you'd probably do it, after much careful planning, with poison, because it's subtle, untraceable (with planning) and effective. Just don't get too cocky, or you might not get away with it.

Your Score: The Strangler
You are 38% composed, 44% stylish and 33% intelligent.

You are a victim to your animal instincts. When you get angry, you lose control. If you were to murder someone, it would probably be after a heated confrontation. You'd get so furious that your only aim would be to cause the other person pain. And how would you do that? You'd reach out your arms and strangle them to death. Slow, painful and ugly.

huh? no it isn't. why would you even think it is? it's fun!




Your Score: The Strangler

You are 22% composed, 44% stylish and 27% intelligent.

You are a victim to your animal instincts. When you get angry, you lose control. If you were to murder someone, it would probably be after a heated confrontation. You'd get so furious that your only aim would be to cause the other person pain. And how would you do that? You'd reach out your arms and strangle them to death. Slow, painful and ugly.

You are 61% composed, 38% stylish and 94% intelligent.

You're not the most stylish of people, but you definitely know how to kill someone. If you were to murder someone, you'd set fire to their house, probably using gasoline and rubber to produce thick, toxic smoke that would kill the victim in minutes. This is a very... thorough... form of murder, because it also destroys loved ones and possessions.

What is it that makes human beings so interested in killing each other? Maybe it's a natural selection mechanism, being that we don't have any natural enemies except ourselves. Maybe it's a perversion of another drive. I mean, what makes paint ball so much "fun?" it's nothing but stalking another human being. While I agree with another poster about this being an inappropriate topic, I have something to say, being that I was in Vietnam.

Killing another human being is not fun. Not unless you're very sick. I knew guys like that, and they just couldn't resist cutting up the enemy before they killed them. Just because you're in a position where it's okay to kill the "enemy," (and where they'll kill you if you don't) doesn't make it any easier. If you're seriously interested in killing someone one (even if you wouldn't do it) it's my position that you should seek help. If you want to know what killing other human beings does to you (unless, of course, you're a sick person) look at what's happening to some of the troops coming home from Iraq, men and women. Vietnam and what I had to do to stay alive, made me a pacifist when I got home. I won't allow a gun in the house, I won't allow violent video games, and I don't "play" paint ball.

One time at an office gathering they wanted us all to play paint ball. Me and another guy (who I knew had been in another very good army,) refused. The rest of the office started teasing us, until finally I looked over at him and said, want to show them what we're talking about? And he smiled. We were our own team, the course was in the Santa Cruz mountains in California. And it was a hunt the "enemy and kill them," course. It took us I think about 10 minutes to take down 25 people. And when we got back to the base camp, everyone was angry at us. My response was "we tried to warn you. We've both been in a situation where we had to kill people it wasn't fun, and neither is this...and we're both trained. So now, where was the fun in that?" They were all "playing" a video game, and we were a couple of battle hardened real soldiers. It wasn't fun. As a matter of fact it upset the hell out of both of us. I still don't understand how people hunt animals, when there's food at the corner store. And least of all, do I understand how people (unless they are very sick) can contemplate with any joy, killing other people. I find it completely sick. I'm sorry. Please don't bother to flame me. My screen name has nothing to do with AS. It has something to do with Vietnam. And I was one of the lucky ones.

My score on The How Would You Commit Murder? Test:

The Stabber
(You are 44% composed, 38% stylish and 55% intelligent.)

"You're smart, although you're clumsy and quickly lose your composure. You would murder someone with a knife. It would probably be after an argument with a loved one - you'd get angry, grab one from the drawer and stab them to death. It's not well-planned or stylish, but it's definitely an effective and quick form of murder."

You are 38% composed, 27% stylish and 33% intelligent.

You are a victim to your animal instincts. When you get angry, you lose control. If you were to murder someone, it would probably be after a heated confrontation. You'd get so furious that your only aim would be to cause the other person pain. And how would you do that? You'd reach out your arms and strangle them to death. Slow, painful and ugly.

Wow! What a crazy test!! !!

Your Score: The ArsonistYou are 77% composed, 44% stylish and 61% intelligent.

You're not the most stylish of people, but you definitely know how to kill someone. If you were to murder someone, you'd set fire to their house, probably using gasoline and rubber to produce thick, toxic smoke that would kill the victim in minutes. This is a very... thorough... form of murder, because it also destroys loved ones and possessions.

Your Score: The Arsonist
You are 61% composed, 38% stylish and 83% intelligent.

You're not the most stylish of people, but you definitely know how to kill someone. If you were to murder someone, you'd set fire to their house, probably using gasoline and rubber to produce thick, toxic smoke that would kill the victim in minutes. This is a very... thorough... form of murder, because it also destroys loved ones and possessions.
My test tracked 3 variables How you compared to other people

Your Score: The Arsonist
You are 61% composed, 44% stylish and 66% intelligent.