magz wrote:
Okay, is this the infamous US (un)education or is she just making laugh on idiocy of the senators?
Both.
magz wrote:
Okay, I expect someone might me unfamiliar with the convention of pregnancy weeks... but the rest - don't you have biology in high school?
Back in the day (mid-1970s), Biology consisted mainly of Anatomy, Taxonomy, Cellular Processes, and dissection of small animals. We had 1 week of "Reproductive Biology" that focused mostly on how farm animals reproduced, with a few short comments related to human anatomy. Anything specific about human reproductive processes were left up to us (e.g., "Go look it up in the library").
Sure, I learned about luteinizing hormones, the placental barrier, and the internal arrangement of the female reproductive system, and my dad's hidden prons collection taught me the external features, but nothing prepared me for experiencing the actual process (mostly second-hand, of course).
So, many of those gray-haired senators are
at least as old as I, and they likely had the same kind of educational experience -- which taught us males that anything to do with the female aspect of reproduction was either (1) none of our business, or (2) too disgusting to talk about.