Reading "The Complete Guide to Asperger's Syndrome" (Attwood
Reading "The Complete Guide to Asperger's Syndrome" (Tony Attwood)- by S. C. Sullivan, December 2017
Reading this heading, you might be wondering how Asperger's Syndrome, more commonly referred to as High-Functioning Autism in the more recent DSM-V diagnostic manual, has anything to do with LinkedIn and the workplace. On the contrary, there are millions of teenagers and young adults in the workforce today, and having personal experience (as well as friends and former classmates) with HFA has compelled me to learn more about some of the pros, cons, "hallmarks", and inconsistent conditions surrounding these individuals. Still others can and will be successful in work and life if we just take a little time to get to know them and their often-impressive skill sets. The other night, I was really excited about the arrival of my brother to the family home for Christmas. I was so glad he'd be on his way that I couldn't sleep very well, and I'd wanted to read the Attwood book for a long time. Around midnight, earlier this December, I decided to take advantage of the extra energy I had by trying to (not only) read and study the book mentioned. I brought the book out again the day after Christmas, and have written down some discoveries and summaries of Tony Attwood's ideas. Rather than using a lot of medical and evaluative jargon, I have simply written down all of the notes I took; however, these only cover chapters 2 and 3. I will plan to update this article as I have time to venture further through the book.
The first several ideas in the section of the book I've been reading say that, rather than using a child's "past history of language and speech use" to determine whether or not they have HFA (High-Functioning Autism), the clinician looking for signs of it should closely examine how that child uses them now. For me, that alone shows that a parent or physician should not just assume who another person is as soon as they are born, or even before that point. One other way in which Attwood shows us not to put the cart before the horse is in chapter 3, where he shows us that any kind of developmental delay or challenge a person faces while of school age does not remotely guarantee that they have any kind of disability or setback, whatsoever. In other words, the person searching for possible diagnoses should look at what the person being tested "does now," rather than at what they used to do earlier in life. I find that interesting.
Another critical thing to be gained from reading this book, and perhaps others like it, is to realize that DSM-V (and DSM-IV before it) can't even come close to finding a diagnosis of AS/HFA in a person unless "80 or more" traits used to describe someone with AS/HFA exist. Attwood goes on to assert that a person can have perhaps "20 or more" traits of a person on the spectrum without having any kind of disability, challenge, or difference. That person at work who just goes on and on about a few things from time to time is not necessarily a person with Asperger's/High-Functioning Autism at all, and may not even be on the spectrum, or be facing any difficulties or differences. If the DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual) can't guarantee that anyone is remotely on the autism spectrum, than how reliable is it? Attwood follows this up by stating that any diagnosis or diagnostic attempt to prove or assert that anyone has Asperger's/HFA is, ultimately, subjective. Should science and medicine be subjective? That is not normally considered "good enough", but sometimes it manages to scrape by.
For those who don't know what Asperger's Syndrome (also called High-Functioning Autism) is, there is no clear answer or defining words for it. It was discovered by Hans Asperger, a Viennese pediatrician who operated a clinic before, during, and after the second World War. Dr. Asperger noted that many of the children at his clinic had a distinct way of conducting themselves, and studied them for decades, even after his clinic was bombed. One thing Tony Attwood discusses in the second chapter of the book is that another Austrian researcher of the same time-period, Leo Kanner, saw Autism much differently (and as a much more severe issue or set of difficulties), in comparison to Dr. Asperger, whereas Dr. Asperger saw obvious (and even enhanced) skills in many of his patients that these individuals could use later in life. They could, perhaps if not likely, be quite successful in the future. In contrast, Dr. Kanner, another early discoverer of autism, saw those with this "physiological difference" (as we would say today) as severely impaired, and perhaps even exhibiting mental retardation. I know we do not want to use that word, but I've used it here only to make a case for how far we've come in the field, and how far still to go.
One of the biggest hurdles to positive perceptions of young people and adults on the spectrum today come not from Dr. Asperger's work, but from the other perceptions. That is a massive problem in the workforce. I read an old post on Reddit last week in which an adult on the spectrum's younger brother asked the American public whether or not his brother could be a teacher. The post dates to around 2010, and unfortunately, the majority of those who replied stated very directly that teaching was not an option for this adult on the autism spectrum. It was mentioned that he just had high-functioning autism, but others remained steadfast in their comments and perceptions. These hundreds of people who never even met this aspiring teacher decided that they knew what was and was not best for him, and that's appalling. Luckily, other British and American clinicians of more recent times have made a stronger push toward honoring directly the work of Dr. Asperger, and his distinguished perceptions and experiences of his patients.
Here are some notes from Chapters 2 and 3 that sum up what I've written:
(1) The DSM manuals don't spell out what those with Asperger's/HFA actually do that marks them as having it.
(2) It is not made obvious how AS/HFA actually impacts the day-to-day actions and skills or difficulties of those with it.
(3) The DSM manuals prefer a diagnosis of Autism instead of AS/HFA; luckily, many researchers and practitioners reject that stance.
(4) People can have some abilities within the (ret*d) range without having that condition.
(5) Not all doctors take the DSM manuals seriously when seeking a diagnosis, leading to a situation (chapter 3) in which a diagnosis of Asperger's Syndrome/HFA becomes subjective (I may have mentioned this above).
(6) The more you get away from Dr. Asperger's research, the harder it is to track AS/HFA in an authentic and just way. In other words, if your beliefs and perceptions follow those of Dr. Kanner, rather than researchers who followed Dr. Asperger's work more closely, you might very well be doing an injustice to, say, your patients, if you're a doctor, clinician, special educator, or consultant.
(7) Girls and women are affected by AS/HFA in ways that often differ from the way that boys and men experience it. They may also be better at "hiding" this condition or trait.
(8) Diagnosing adults with AS/HFA may be far more difficult, for similar reasons it may be difficult to diagnose girls as having it.
(9) Those who know adults found to be on the spectrum can be helpful in fostering or supporting the process of seeking a diagnosis, and/or resources to assist those on it, regardless of the degree to which their AS/HFA may or may not impact them.
(10) Girls and women with AS/HFA may see their symptoms or AS-related traits more when it comes to emotion and relationships, while boys and men with AS/HFA (who aren't yet aware of it, same with the girls and women) might see troubles in employment and relationship circumstances and allocations.
In sum, this article covers only the first three chapters of Tony Attwood's book. I hope to enlighten the workplace and social spheres, not by merely repeating what actual doctors might have said (I'm not a doctor; I'm a musician and future teacher), but by helping all of us to take a closer and more compassionate look at those we know, those we've spent time with, and those we'll never meet, with Asperger's Syndrome/High-Functioning Autism. Many of these individuals have been, are, and will become some of the world's greatest living resources, even if they don't look like Einstein or Beethoven, and even if the things that challenge or motivate them aren't deemed immediately apparent or applicable to the solutions and insights we look for as a society and world. Thank you for taking the time to read it, and I'd like to wish you a Merry Christmas, Happy Holidays, and a Joyful New Year in 2018.
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 39,637
Location: Long Island, New York
There is no “High Functioning Autism” in the DSM 5. It is a commonly used term just not in the manual. In the manual “Autism Spectrum Disorder Level 1 without intellectual impairment” most closely resembles “High Functioning Autism”. “Autism Spectrum Disorder Level 1 without intellectual impairment and without language impairment” most closely resembles “Aspergers”.
It is all subjective.
_________________
“Self Acceptance is a process not a performance”
“You are autistic enough. And you always have been”
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.
It is all subjective.
It's OK journey2017 to use the terms High Functioning Autism AND Asperger's Syndrome if your therapist or psychologist has classified you under those terms with the previous classifications.
ASPartOfMe is of the typical arrogant American attitude that believes the world revolves around the USA and their understanding of the world. Which it most certainly does NOT. Believe me, we in Canada are quite amused but quite tired of listening to constant American arrogance when it comes to their interpretations of the world.
ASPartOfMe is stuck with the attitude that just because a new classification of Autism has arrived from on high in Yankee Doodle Land doesn't mean that our personal and particular diagnoses are now null and void. That now you are somehow NOT Autistic or something preposterous like that. Any moron can quote the DSM-5 until the cows come home if they wish but every clinical psychologist in the world knows that previous Autism classifications still apply.
DSM-5 and the American re-interpretation of Autism hasn't changed the world as we know it. I'm sure the Yanks believe it has... like AsPartOfMe and his calloused shutdowns of others' posts which he has become famous for in these forums. VERY tiresome.
Quite rude ASPartOfMe. Very rude behaviour indeed as quoted above.
Since you love to link documents then read this http://raisingchildren.net.au/articles/aspergers_disorder_signs_and_symptoms.html
It said there, "If your child already has a diagnosis of autistic disorder, Asperger’s syndrome or PDD-NOS you can keep using these terms if you want to."
Jiminey crickets the Yanks have become so arrogant as of late that now apparently Pluto is no longer a planet. Holy smoke the arrogance is sickening. Same kind of people who think they have THAT much power. Unreal.
Asperger's Syndrome is STILL valid and High Functioning Autism is STILL valid too because everyone who is anyone STILL understands what that means and all educational and psychological institutions do too so knock it off ASPartOfMe.
/facepalm
_________________
*** High Functioning Autism - Asperger's Syndrome ***
ADHD, OCD, and PTSD.
Keep calm and stim away.
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 39,637
Location: Long Island, New York
It is all subjective.
It's OK journey2017 to use the terms High Functioning Autism AND Asperger's Syndrome if your therapist or psychologist has classified you under those terms with the previous classifications.
ASPartOfMe is of the typical arrogant American attitude that believes the world revolves around the USA and their understanding of the world. Which it most certainly does NOT. Believe me, we in Canada are quite amused but quite tired of listening to constant American arrogance when it comes to their interpretations of the world.
ASPartOfMe is stuck with the attitude that just because a new classification of Autism has arrived from on high in Yankee Doodle Land doesn't mean that our personal and particular diagnoses are now null and void. That now you are somehow NOT Autistic or something preposterous like that. Any moron can quote the DSM-5 until the cows come home if they wish but every clinical psychologist in the world knows that previous Autism classifications still apply.
DSM-5 and the American re-interpretation of Autism hasn't changed the world as we know it. I'm sure the Yanks believe it has... like AsPartOfMe and his calloused shutdowns of others' posts which he has become famous for in these forums. VERY tiresome.
Quite rude ASPartOfMe. Very rude behaviour indeed as quoted above.
Since you love to link documents then read this http://raisingchildren.net.au/articles/aspergers_disorder_signs_and_symptoms.html
It said there, "If your child already has a diagnosis of autistic disorder, Asperger’s syndrome or PDD-NOS you can keep using these terms if you want to."
Jiminey crickets the Yanks have become so arrogant as of late that now apparently Pluto is no longer a planet. Holy smoke the arrogance is sickening. Same kind of people who think they have THAT much power. Unreal.
Asperger's Syndrome is STILL valid and High Functioning Autism is STILL valid too because everyone who is anyone STILL understands what that means and all educational and psychological institutions do too so knock it off ASPartOfMe.
/facepalm
Did I ever say the OP did not have Aspergers or nobody should identify as Aspergers because the American Psychological Association decided it should not exist anymore? If I felt that way identifying myself "ASPartOfMe" is a strange way of expressing that.
The OP specifically referred to the DSM 5 having a "high functioning autism" diagnosis which is factually incorrect. That is what I pointed out. I also pointed out the term is still used. I was not implying anything else quit reading more into it.
Just be happy you live in a locale where Aspergers is a official diagnosis or have a clinician that believes Aspergers is a real condition.
Fact: If your clinician follows the DSM 5 literally your diagnosis will be subsumed. "Individuals with a well-established DSM-IV diagnosis of autistic disorder, Asperger’s disorder, or pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified should be given the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder". The manual says nothing about self identification and even if it did what are they going to do send the CIA after you?
_________________
“Self Acceptance is a process not a performance”
“You are autistic enough. And you always have been”
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.
The DSM has long been in diagnostic use in many countries around the world for a long time, but the DSM V has had mostly lukewarm response from non-American countries (and to some extent even inside the US). Many professionals still prefer to use the DSM-IV.
In any case, it's a diagnostic manual as it says in its title ("Diagnostic and Statistical Manual"), that's more concerned about diagnosing low-functioning severe disabilities for aiding treatment, and less about documenting human neurodiversity.
The ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases) is also widely used in many countries (either instead of or in addition to the DSM), and that still has an Asperger's Syndrome subsection separately.
_________________
There is no justice in the laws of Nature, no term for fairness in the equations of motion. The universe is neither evil, nor good, it simply does not care. The stars don't care, or the Sun, or the sky. But they don't have to! We care! There is light in the world, and it is us!
(Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality, Eliezer Yudkowsky)
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 39,637
Location: Long Island, New York
The ICD-11 coming out in May will also fold Aspergers into Autism. The manuals are a guideline, as far as I know clinicions do not lose their licenses if they do not follow the latest manual or the manuals at all.
As you pointed out the manuals are by definition is based on the “medical modal” of autism. People mostly fall into three general catagories regarding this topic.
1. Autism is a disabilty and belongs in the manual.
2. Autistics difficulties are partially or mostly caused by society. The manuals are a imperfect but neccasary evil needed as a way to get benifits and supports until such time as Autistics are fully accepted.
3. Aspergers is a difference not a disability and never belonged in disease manuals.
_________________
“Self Acceptance is a process not a performance”
“You are autistic enough. And you always have been”
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.
I am trying to get my head around what Atwood is saying. Is he saying you need to have 80 of those traits to be on spectrum/ be functionally disabled as opposed to just "different"?
If so that seems rather simplistic.
Irrespective of meeting the criteria for asd or not people can have difficulties in functioning.
_________________
Socially drifted middle class
That's interesting, I did not know that ICD-11 was coming out in just a few months.
And the manuals are only a guideline, I agree. It's useful to give psychiatrists a common language, and for legal purposes, but in practice it's hardly ever strictly followed; the human mind is messy, and comorbidity of different illnesses is so common, that a lot still has to be left to individual judgement.
1. Autism is a disabilty and belongs in the manual.
2. Autistics difficulties are partially or mostly caused by society. The manuals are a imperfect but neccasary evil needed as a way to get benifits and supports until such time as Autistics are fully accepted.
3. Aspergers is a difference not a disability and never belonged in disease manuals.
I think I mostly fall into 2, though I can see the intentions behind the other two positions.
_________________
There is no justice in the laws of Nature, no term for fairness in the equations of motion. The universe is neither evil, nor good, it simply does not care. The stars don't care, or the Sun, or the sky. But they don't have to! We care! There is light in the world, and it is us!
(Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality, Eliezer Yudkowsky)
I believe the terms are used somewhat interchangeably. Anyway, the bottom line is that whether you use the term Asperger's Syndrome or High-Functioning Autism, many of the people at this end of the spectrum are likely going to be more able to reach and exceed society's expectations (and their own), in some cases, than those toward the other end. It doesn't bother me if @ASPartofMe doesn't find the term High-Functioning Autism favorable, although I am concerned that terms might only be used if applied by a medical professional; that's a little unsettling. Nonetheless, it is because of Western-style democracy that posts and websites like these exist, and @ASPartofMe should feel free to state their opinion. Of course I may be a little biased as a fellow American.
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 39,637
Location: Long Island, New York
Getting back to Tony Attwood, Austrailian TV aired a documentary about him, besides his views about Aspergers, his history is documented and his family are interviewed.
_________________
“Self Acceptance is a process not a performance”
“You are autistic enough. And you always have been”
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.
