Mona Pereth wrote:
. . . Calling Autism $peaks an anti-autistic "hate group" was reasonable back in the days when they made videos like "I Am Autism" (that portrayed autism as a child-stealing demon) and "Autism Every Day" (in which a woman talked about how she had once considered driving off a bridge with her daughter -- and said this right in front of her daughter!). But that was over 10 years ago, and their tone has certainly changed. If we continue to call them a "hate group," we will succeed only in discrediting ourselves. . .
You raise a very good point. As the organization changes, we should be willing to (cautiously) give them a fresh start.
In a similar way, the U.S. veteran’s organization “Wounded Warrior” ran into real problems back in 2016. In fact, the board of directors fired both the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Operating Officer, mainly because the two of them had allowed the organization to engage in lavish spending with the donations they received.
In addition, Wounded Warrior often presented veterans as objects of pity, instead of emphasizing what the veteran might be able to do with just a medium amount of help. Plus, Wounded Warrior was very aggressive in defending its copyright.
Autism Speaks ($peaks!) has made some of the same mistakes. And yet, I’m willing to (slowly) give them a fresh start.
—————————————————
Okay, the really difficult, big, ugly, confusing topic is that . . .
“research” into autism might mean finding the set of genes and then prenatal testing and, in many cases, selective abortions.
And yes, I’m pro-choice. I believe the decision of whether to continue a pregnancy rests with the woman who is pregnant.
And yet, I’d point to Denmark and Down Syndrome as a cautionary tale. In fact, we could look at this as the canary in the mine.