Neither greater, nor smaller

Post Reply New Topic

Sounds interesting. There are many avenues to accomplish. Not just one way.

I work with the Chamber of Commerce and they let me write on the front page of their newsletter, media, broadcasting with hours of donated air time and even the at the time mayors wife received pallets for the project and still does. I do not get involved in local politics like the city council or other issues. When someone wants me to sign a petition or represent an issue I just resort to it's a conflict of interest policy. The good thing is I can make up the rules and spend a great amount of time thinking about the long-term potentials of issues to safe guard what I do to better the leadership. There are hundreds of loyal customers and growing and the business community that I have interacted with has been very positive and nice. In effect the program has not been able to grow due to to much demand but now the new equipment will soon arrive and now I can focus on expanding the opportunity.

I will never run for mayor or any other position I don't think as I just lack an interest.

Let's have a competition. If in 7 years I have not reached 5 million in annual sales like you then you win.

Alright we will see as I am getting calls from outside of the area already and have yet to market it to new potentials.


"Autism Parents that own businesses"

Don't write the promotional material yourself!

Really getting old guy. I do so all the time and have written for the media, Chamber of Commerce and on printed material to tens of thousands. IS your need to feel superior so important to you that you got to keep pushing at it. Why don't you tell me what company you own and the town you were mayor of so I can see your accomplishments. I don't tend to take people seriously in what they say unless they show me the evidence like for instance your claim to fortune.

Actually teachers use to tell me of my good writing skills. It's just the grammar if you look past it. Also the concepts I have to resort to are not the easiest to explain. In fact verbally I have a really hard time putting together the expressive structure unless it's well scripted before time. I will work on it but at the same time these kinds of issues and abstract verbiages are not my typical public relations toward the public. My goal here is to influence which I have done to cause an effect so as to protect the interest of individuals with substantial disabilities from adverse political agenda's of adversity. It's what I call neutralization activism. To reduce the cause and effect upon otherwise non-involved parties for the greater benefit of progress. Seeming you are the head of a multi-million dollar business and an achieved politician it might be hard to relate to the sensitive nature of these issues with regards to the damaging nature of merging issues which other very high functioning advocates have progressed. I believe it is necessary to limit their effect on others not involved and simply that. I have no interest in being a general advocacy leader as it's simply not interesting.

Pleased to see that you recognise your limitations.

Now you have to develop a plan to minimise their impact or overcome them.

It is a balance. One either believes in themselves reasonably or feels dis-empowered by failure and or does not at all resolve to accomplish and overcome. However I would make the suggestion to you that to instill an inability to succeed by ones nature is by far a travesty to common sense evidences.

They are overcome and I provide consultation to other organization when needed and privately with concern. I do not think the pride folks will be making any demands or attacks upon my organization anymore. I have nothing to do with them and find that inclusive progress and opportunity can be achieved with balanced approaches.

As I said that grammar will not change as I spent a great while trying to learn it. Let me ask a question if you will be honest? How does it make you feel that you know how to do proper grammar and I do not and that you point it out to me when their is little I can do about it? Would you be happy if I constantly pointed something out to you that you have little control over? How about if I did it in front of an audience that knew your real name, where you work and your disability diagnoses? What if I was to imply here and now that perhaps you should re-think your approach and that perhaps your not being respectful by private messaging me about it? Are you unwilling to compromise on the matter?

I can see you deem your methods important and will not admit change to them. Regardless I think I made the point fairly clear. Why don't you tell me the name of your business and provide proof about your being once a mayor. If you do so I can then take you more seriously. Many people do not take people online seriously on issues unless they are willing to take heat for what they believe. I do not sell anything online and others also provide advocacy group information they head or are members of. Can you private message me your company name and information so I might confirm your political credentials so you will not be marketing non-advocacy matters to the group? All I'm getting from you is reverse arguments that I've made concerning other matters and pointing out grammar to really target my self-esteem personally which lacks originality and avoids the real issues. As I said I have thick skin as the saying goes and it really doesn't unmotivated me or make me think I am less capable because of your judgement. You either got to stake claim to what you say or politically wimp out. I personally don't hide myself and what I say behind a computer screen out of fear but I'm out in the open.

It's time to take some heat or shut up as the saying goes. Stand behind what you say or get lost. Well?

Nathan

I am not going to give you my name nor details of my business.

However, I would challenge you to approach a number of regular posters to this site for feedback on your communication style.

I suggest that "arrogant" "poorly written" "dogmatic" "lacking in logic" and "incompressible" would be common themes.

As I say, I have given you up as a lost cause.

Yeah right lacking logic when it's based on critical reasoning. Again I don't take you very seriously at all. Argue the points and evolve the debate or don't participate. I've spent many hours detailing rational understandings and have put in the time, effort and concerned enough forthright respect to bother in the first place. If you can't and out right refuse like some others to protect a tightly held belief then so be it. It's not my error necessary especially with refusing to bother in the first place. I've tried and I write in the same way to professionals and they have detailed conversation about it and seem to understand.

I may have not been able to learn well in school room environments but that didn't stop me from learning. I have books on critical reasoning, political sciences, sociology, psychology, criminology and related. Yet I spend time discussing matters with people who don't read such material and bother to take the time in the first place.

Move on..

Ask the other users!