lau wrote:
The context is measles, until the OP changes it.
Oh, good, you've returned. I've missed the way you summarily reject everything that doesn't bleat of conformity.
The context shifted to chicken pox in your absence.
Welcome back.
lau wrote:
I'm uncertain of your meaning here. If you are trying to stop people making statements supported by the evidence, and instead requiring them to accept your stories, I'm afraid that will not happen.
Is that your goal? Getting people to accept your stories?
the problem with uniformly rejecting everything is that it starts to look transparent after a while. Where exactly are you obtaining your "evidence"?? Your doctor? The media? Magic 8 ball? And please don't cite me a crapload of politically bent, uninformed, faulty reporting process, pharm-funded organizations.
lau wrote:
He didn't need to.

Attempting to give a damn.... *strain*