Page 8 of 11 [ 166 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next

lau
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Age: 76
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,798
Location: Somerset UK

24 Dec 2008, 12:01 am

ThisUserNameIsTaken wrote:
It seems you didn't comprehend my post at all. Sad.

Yes. My comprehension is excellent. Thank you for acknowledging where the fault lies.


_________________
"Striking up conversations with strangers is an autistic person's version of extreme sports." Kamran Nazeer


Bataar
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Sep 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,862
Location: Post Falls, ID

24 Dec 2008, 12:27 am

To those of you against the idea of a cure, what do you say about the various groups of deaf people who are against treating deafness? Is society "judging" them by stating the complete obvious that there is something wrong with them? I think this is a very similar situation. If a cure is found, God willing, then it shouldn't be forced on people. Only those who want it would take it. I see nothing wrong with that.



ThisUserNameIsTaken
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 30 Nov 2008
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 96

24 Dec 2008, 1:07 am

Yet another person who doesn't seem to understand that a pill cure would not change a person's DNA.

People, in case you all failed high school biology, allow me to explain something about evolution: It's based entirely on the passage of genes. Explain to me how a cure either eliminates autistic genes or causes people to be unable to pass on their genes (and before one more person tries to re-use the "screenings are teh evilz!1" line out of reflex, we're not talking about screenings, we're talking about cures).

And if you all haven't realized, aspies aren't very good at passing on their genes as it stands right now. Without a cure we'll actually get out-bred. So if your goal is to turn all of humanity into aspies, then you should actually want a cure because guess what? AS and autism will get bred out of the gene pool given enough generations.

Anyway, let's see if I can't respond to this guy's garbled post of random ideas:

Inventor wrote:
A cure, a pill, based on? Show some serious experiments, autism is found in the whole rodent branch


Just because science doesn't know something right now, doesn't mean we won't in the future. One only need to look at history to realize that. Also, the point about autism being found in rodents is pretty damn good evidence that it's biologically based. If it were merely just a difference in personality then we wouldn't find it in an animal with such low cognitive powers as a rat.

Inventor wrote:
The Neo cortex is new, the species has gone through many steps of larger and larger brain, and how does that happen?


It's ironic you ask this since the evolutionary drive for a bigger brain in humans was guided by the increased advantage that came with having better social abilities. You can read back a page or two to find a longer post by me on the subject, or just take any anthropology class.

Inventor wrote:
From what I have been hearing, "stop evolution now!"


Alright, this was random as well as an incomplete sentence.

Inventor wrote:
It was only 40,000 years ago when thick skulled round heads were replaced with long heads, with thin skulls. Expanding dense brains? It took several thousand years, then there were mostly long heads. I am sure there were some intermediate versions, who did not catch on to the new ways.


40,000 years ago the only hominids on the planet were neanderthals and modern humans (and by that point the neanderthals were almost extinct), neither of which match the former description you gave. Modern humans are 130,000-200,000 years old, so you're way, way, WAY off on your dating.

Inventor wrote:
Please define what is so great about this imaginary NT that everyone should be just like them. Their constant warfare? Pillaging the planet for profit? Invading other cultures to enslave and extirminate them?


Yes, because all NTs are evil and all aspies are good. Furthermore, it's not like humans are the most cognitively advanced member of the most aggressive and violent family of animals on the planet (primates).

Inventor wrote:
The root cause of a cure seems to be what Malcome X said, "The chickens will come home to roost."


Uhhh....okaaayyy???

Inventor wrote:
Cure Autism, and ban the Internet! Make everyone sign loyality oaths?


What does curing autism have to do with banning the internet and singing loyalty oaths? And how does this have anything to do with the rest of your post?

Inventor wrote:
A differance in thought and perception is seen as a threat by the weak. A world wide Internet army of nerds and geeks, functioning without needing faces, body posture, only mental content.


I really don't think that people are threatened by the fact that we don't socialize...rather I think they see a bunch of people who aren't capable of socializing and they say to themselves "that's horrible, someone should help them". But hey, you go ahead and keep on thinking that everyone fears us and that's there's a conspiracy to take us all out because of our natural superiority to everyone else. I wouldn't want to intrude on your narcissistic fantasies.

Inventor wrote:
I do not hear this as lets cure the mentally ret*d. It is directed at the computer literate, intelligent, a threat, and because they do not care what you think, they should be forced to, to be like everyone.


By your logic we shouldn't be trying to cure any other mental disorder as well. Just because someone isn't ret*d doesn't mean they don't have deficiencies in other areas.

Inventor wrote:
Yes, the world is moving away from the old centers of power. Newspapers and TV no longer control public opinion, thousands of bloggers do. More books are now published by desk top publishers than traditional publishers, there is a loss of control.


TV and newspapers no longer control public opinion? Are we talking about the same public? Were you asleep for the past two years during the presidential election?

Inventor wrote:
It is all flowing to the computer and the Internet. The leading technological figures of the age are called geek, nerd, and weird.

Yes, they have that Autism disease, and should be cured, so normal people can use the Internet to watch football.


Most people that would be labeled as nerds and geeks do not have AS even though some people seem to think that being a geek or nerd automatically makes you an aspie. And many aspies would not appear to be nerds or geeks. And "weird" is a very vague term that pretty much applies to everyone who is a little bit odd. So really anyone with a mental disorder, eccentricity, who belongs to a sub-culture, or anything else that makes them stand-out even a little from the mainstream.

Inventor wrote:
They care more about things and knowledge, placing it above being social with everyone. They must be cured, for normal people do not want to learn about things. They should not be allowed to change the world in secret from a keyboard. They are a threat to the herd! What about Herd Power?


Yet more narcissistic dribble.

Inventor wrote:
It seems to be fading, and with the withdrawal of the thinking to the Internet, the face to face social world is much smaller, poorer, and has only each other to pick on. Hence the cause, 1% of children who have Autism are to blame. They must be cured, so normal people can feel normal?


Sorry, I can't decipher this grammatical mess.



lau
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Age: 76
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,798
Location: Somerset UK

24 Dec 2008, 1:21 am

ThisUserNameIsTaken, you need to read the WrongPlanet Rules.
In particular:

Quote:
2. Personal attacks.
This includes insinuation, ridicule and personal insults, regardless of whether direct or indirect. Attacking an opinion, belief or philosophy is acceptable, but attacking the person making the comments is not.


_________________
"Striking up conversations with strangers is an autistic person's version of extreme sports." Kamran Nazeer


Naturella
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 8 Dec 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 186

24 Dec 2008, 1:24 am

garyww wrote:
It is a matter of who can communicate with who and who are we to judge what is 'normal' and what is 'abnormal'. Severly Autistic kids are not braindead as much as everybody would like to believe it. They hear and understand what we're saying but they can't speak back. They are not ret*d. They don't need to be cured but we need to learn about how to communicate with them. This is where the research should be.

And given that they almost never able to support themselves, I assume, you gonna pay for their living, huh? I think your position - is obvious sophistics. I think there are pretty good standard in society and medicine of what is normal and what is not. You can deffinitely prove here that the white is black and that the sky is the ground. but that would be just BS. The verbosity of no practical value neither clear purpose.



Naturella
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 8 Dec 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 186

24 Dec 2008, 1:43 am

lau wrote:
ThisUserNameIsTaken, you need to read the WrongPlanet Rules.
In particular:
Quote:
2. Personal attacks.
This includes insinuation, ridicule and personal insults, regardless of whether direct or indirect. Attacking an opinion, belief or philosophy is acceptable, but attacking the person making the comments is not.


I do not get why he has to read those rules, while it is you who are being rude to him and ridiculing him of being disordered?
lau wrote:
ThisUserNameIsTaken wrote:
There's a reason AS is considered to be a neurological disorder. Take a guess (hint: the root word of "neurological" is "neuron")

Ah, but I consider it a neurological difference. I understand that you feel disordered, but that is not my problem.
.



ThisIsNotMyRealName
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 23 Dec 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 157

24 Dec 2008, 5:10 am

jimmister wrote:
Hello.

I just want to tell you all to leave the pro-cure groups alone.

You have every right to have your opinion, but wouldn't you rather have good social skills than other positive aspie traits, in order to get married and have a family? Sure, aspies can do that, but it's a lot trickier (the troubling challenge of finding someone plus all the years God has cost me of having to learn social skills, I don't even feel like learning). Getting married and having a family is the MOST important thing I want to do in my entire lifetime, aside from everything else. What do you say?

From everything I've read on the web, pro-cure members of WP don't last very long on the forum - and however civilised they may be, end up being banned before they can express very much of their views.



rdos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jul 2005
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,096
Location: Sweden

24 Dec 2008, 6:42 am

Naturella wrote:
And given that they almost never able to support themselves, I assume, you gonna pay for their living, huh? I think your position - is obvious sophistics.


Let me see if I get your line of reasoning correct:
1. You don't want to pay for LFAs
2. People should force cures onto LFAs so you don't have to pay
3. Since there are no cures, exterminating them with prenatal tests would be just as good, as this would also mean you don't have to pay?



ThisIsNotMyRealName
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 23 Dec 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 157

24 Dec 2008, 6:58 am

The whole curebie/neurodiversity debate's really a bit of a waste of everyone's time, because until a cure's available, no-one can pass judgment on which side of the divide they find it best to be on.

It might turn out that after trying a temporary cure, millions of AS'ers didn't want to return to their AS - preferring to remain NT/cured.
If none of millions of AS'ers wanted to return to their AS, would the anti-curebies STILL object to parents having their children cured ?



Last edited by ThisIsNotMyRealName on 24 Dec 2008, 7:02 am, edited 1 time in total.

rdos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jul 2005
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,096
Location: Sweden

24 Dec 2008, 7:00 am

ThisUserNameIsTaken wrote:
And if you all haven't realized, aspies aren't very good at passing on their genes as it stands right now. Without a cure we'll actually get out-bred. So if your goal is to turn all of humanity into aspies, then you should actually want a cure because guess what? AS and autism will get bred out of the gene pool given enough generations.


The reason the genes will be outbred lies in the labels, not in our functioning. It is people with labels that have the poorest reproduction. As a group, Aspies even today reproduce at almost the same amount as NTs, and given that the "gobal society" will soon fail because of overexploitation of resources, it will soon vanish, and Aspies will once again reproduce at similar (or higher) levels as NTs.

ThisUserNameIsTaken wrote:
Inventor wrote:
The Neo cortex is new, the species has gone through many steps of larger and larger brain, and how does that happen?


It's ironic you ask this since the evolutionary drive for a bigger brain in humans was guided by the increased advantage that came with having better social abilities. You can read back a page or two to find a longer post by me on the subject, or just take any anthropology class.


Not quite. If this was so, why do the social abilities of NTs look indistinguishable from those of apes? Apes too make war, set up dominance hierarchies and all the rest of the NT social traits. It seems to me you only need a chimp-sized brain to accomplish this.


ThisUserNameIsTaken wrote:
Inventor wrote:
It was only 40,000 years ago when thick skulled round heads were replaced with long heads, with thin skulls. Expanding dense brains? It took several thousand years, then there were mostly long heads. I am sure there were some intermediate versions, who did not catch on to the new ways.


40,000 years ago the only hominids on the planet were neanderthals and modern humans (and by that point the neanderthals were almost extinct), neither of which match the former description you gave. Modern humans are 130,000-200,000 years old, so you're way, way, WAY off on your dating.


Not really. 40,000 years ago was the first time the Aspie genes ended up in our dysfunctional species.


ThisUserNameIsTaken wrote:
Inventor wrote:
A differance in thought and perception is seen as a threat by the weak. A world wide Internet army of nerds and geeks, functioning without needing faces, body posture, only mental content.


I really don't think that people are threatened by the fact that we don't socialize...rather I think they see a bunch of people who aren't capable of socializing and they say to themselves "that's horrible, someone should help them". But hey, you go ahead and keep on thinking that everyone fears us and that's there's a conspiracy to take us all out because of our natural superiority to everyone else. I wouldn't want to intrude on your narcissistic fantasies.


Inventor has a point in that the Internet doesn't require the reading of nonverbal cues, and thus is a great place for Aspies to excel. With good online dating-services aimed at Aspies, I bet we could also boost reproduction so the genes no longer decline in prevalence. Then we have solved the problem of the continued existence of the Aspie genes without any cures. :wink:

Inventor wrote:
It is all flowing to the computer and the Internet. The leading technological figures of the age are called geek, nerd, and weird.

Yes, they have that Autism disease, and should be cured, so normal people can use the Internet to watch football.


:wink:

ThisUserNameIsTaken wrote:
Most people that would be labeled as nerds and geeks do not have AS even though some people seem to think that being a geek or nerd automatically makes you an aspie. And many aspies would not appear to be nerds or geeks. And "weird" is a very vague term that pretty much applies to everyone who is a little bit odd. So really anyone with a mental disorder, eccentricity, who belongs to a sub-culture, or anything else that makes them stand-out even a little from the mainstream.


Obviously not correct. These are part of the broader autism phenotype. If you get your way in curing the diagnosed population, these people will be the next natural target for cures.



rdos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jul 2005
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,096
Location: Sweden

24 Dec 2008, 7:08 am

ThisIsNotMyRealName wrote:
The whole curebie/neurodiversity debate's really a bit of a waste of everyone's time, because until a cure's available, no-one can pass judgment on which side of the divide they find it best to be on.

It might turn out that after trying a temporary cure, millions of AS'ers didn't want to return to their AS - preferring to remain NT/cured.
If none of millions of AS'ers wanted to return to their AS, would the anti-curebies STILL object to parents having their children cured ?


Again, I want to see the cures for personality-traits first. Not even things like pedophilia or paraphilias, that seems to have a quite simple behavioral background, are today curable. The only cures here are to lower testosterone, which is not in any way a cure, and it does have side-effects. The "cures" for ADHD are in the same domain. And I'm still waiting for the cured apes that are able to communicate with NTs using NT nonverbal communication.



ThisIsNotMyRealName
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 23 Dec 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 157

24 Dec 2008, 7:13 am

Aspie genes are not peculiar to Homo Sapiens.

They are common to all social mammals - because of the requirement for social hierarchy.

Without them, there would be unrestrained conflict for finite resources (territory, mates, etc) - which would heavily disadvantage populations without them vs. populations where innate hierarchy precluded conflict.

Animals lower down the hierarchy naturally defer to those higher up.
You see it in primates, dogs, meerkats, etc, etc.



rdos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jul 2005
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,096
Location: Sweden

24 Dec 2008, 7:17 am

ThisIsNotMyRealName wrote:
Aspie genes are not peculiar to Homo Sapiens.

They are common to all social mammals - because of the requirement for social hierarchy.


Yes, but the Aspie genes are primarily the inability to understand NT nonverbal communication. As such, they are almost universal in the animal kingdom. Nobody else than NTs are able to read NT nonverbal communication.

ThisIsNotMyRealName wrote:
Without them, there would be unrestrained conflict for finite resources (territory, mates, etc) - which would heavily disadvantage populations without them vs. populations where innate hierarchy precluded conflict.


Only in species with an overlapping social organisational model, like NTs and many herd animals. In solitary species, there are no such social organisation models.

ThisIsNotMyRealName wrote:
Animals lower down the hierarchy naturally defer to those higher up.
You see it in primates, dogs, meerkats, etc, etc.


There are solitary primates.



ThisIsNotMyRealName
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 23 Dec 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 157

24 Dec 2008, 7:18 am

rdos wrote:
ThisIsNotMyRealName wrote:
The whole curebie/neurodiversity debate's really a bit of a waste of everyone's time, because until a cure's available, no-one can pass judgment on which side of the divide they find it best to be on.

It might turn out that after trying a temporary cure, millions of AS'ers didn't want to return to their AS - preferring to remain NT/cured.
If none of millions of AS'ers wanted to return to their AS, would the anti-curebies STILL object to parents having their children cured ?


Again, I want to see the cures for personality-traits first. Not even things like pedophilia or paraphilias, that seems to have a quite simple behavioral background, are today curable. The only cures here are to lower testosterone, which is not in any way a cure, and it does have side-effects. The "cures" for ADHD are in the same domain. And I'm still waiting for the cured apes that are able to communicate with NTs using NT nonverbal communication.

No, I'm not talking about a partial cure but a total conversion to neurotypicality (which doesn't yet exist) - from which none of millions of Aspies ever wanted to return.

What then ?

Would the anti-curebies STILL be against parents curing their children ?



rdos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jul 2005
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,096
Location: Sweden

24 Dec 2008, 7:30 am

ThisIsNotMyRealName wrote:
No, I'm not talking about a partial cure but a total conversion to neurotypicality (which doesn't yet exist) - from which none of millions of Aspies ever wanted to return.


The only "partial" cure I've ever witnessed was the ART program. The aim of part of this program was to learn children some key NT social adaptations. Like greating people, looking at people, initiating a conversation, small-talk. I decided I didn't want to learn any of this very fast. Since I don't even want the partial cure, I'm pretty sure I don't want the full one either. I'm pretty cotent with being odd and eccentric. :wink:

ThisIsNotMyRealName wrote:
What then ?

Would the anti-curebies STILL be against parents curing their children ?


I want to see the cure before I decide. Talking about hypothetical cures that might be generations into the future isn't meaningful.



DeanFoley
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 6 Nov 2007
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 354
Location: England-Birmingham

24 Dec 2008, 7:49 am

Inventor wrote:
The first ethical rule, First, do no harm.

A cure, a pill, based on? Show some serious experiments, autism is found in the whole rodent branch.

Dense Neuron Syndrome? That is all we have to go on.

The Neo cortex is new, the species has gone through many steps of larger and larger brain, and how does that happen?

From what I have been hearing, "stop evolution now!"

It was only 40,000 years ago when thick skulled round heads were replaced with long heads, with thin skulls. Expanding dense brains? It took several thousand years, then there were mostly long heads. I am sure there were some intermediate versions, who did not catch on to the new ways.

I am sure there were some who wanted to cure long heads. With the change came art and technology, and long heads were what was left.

Please define what is so great about this imaginary NT that everyone should be just like them. Their constant warfare? Pillaging the planet for profit? Invading other cultures to enslave and extirminate them?

The root cause of a cure seems to be what Malcome X said, "The chickens will come home to roost."

Cure Autism, and ban the Internet! Make everyone sign loyality oaths?

A differance in thought and perception is seen as a threat by the weak. A world wide Internet army of nerds and geeks, functioning without needing faces, body posture, only mental content.

I do not hear this as lets cure the mentally ret*d. It is directed at the computer literate, intelligent, a threat, and because they do not care what you think, they should be forced to, to be like everyone.

Yes, the world is moving away from the old centers of power. Newspapers and TV no longer control public opinion, thousands of bloggers do. More books are now published by desk top publishers than traditional publishers, there is a loss of control.

It is all flowing to the computer and the Internet. The leading technological figures of the age are called geek, nerd, and weird.

Yes, they have that Autism disease, and should be cured, so normal people can use the Internet to watch football.

They care more about things and knowledge, placing it above being social with everyone. They must be cured, for normal people do not want to learn about things. They should not be allowed to change the world in secret from a keyboard. They are a threat to the herd! What about Herd Power?

It seems to be fading, and with the withdrawal of the thinking to the Internet, the face to face social world is much smaller, poorer, and has only each other to pick on. Hence the cause, 1% of children who have Autism are to blame. They must be cured, so normal people can feel normal?

Bubba down at the feed store says they need a DNA change, just drain out the bad DNA, and fill them up with some Real American DNA.

Joe Bob at the autobody says they are missing some chemical, and the right one would fix them.

Down at the church the preacher knows it is demons, and sitting on the child will drive the demon out.

The views of three wise me, who do not mess with them computers.


All I got out of that is that aspies are the only one's who can use the internet and everyone is afraid of us and our superior intelligence.

ThisUserNameIsTaken summed it up pretty well I think...