ManErg wrote:
Quote:
hmm, a union for engineers and technology workers on the spectrum would have to be open to both male and female
No, not at all.

Women have their own groups, as this thread shows. Isn't it amazing how on a thread started by somebody who's created a female Aspie group to further the rights of female aspies, at the first mention of AS men doing similar, we have a suggestion that we have to let women in.
you missed the point. there are enough women who work in IT and engineering that a special interest group excluding them based on their sex would be needlessly discriminatory. a group for women with a particular condition is not discriminatory because spectrum females are grossly underrepresented by advocacy groups and unrecognized by the medical and educational systems, and as a result disadvantaged when it comes to things like diagnosis and support.
if you want to talk about a support network for men on the spectrum, go ahead, and the merits can be discussed. male and female needs are different, so it would make sense, BUT a group whose bargaining power is based on the value of the professions represented should not discriminate based on sex, unless its purpose is to represent an historically underrepresented group.
Yes. Gender has nothing to do with this idea. Tech workers need a union. Boeing engineers are unionized. Why can't IT people organize? Actually there have been several attempts to organize a union but it didn't go anywhere.