Our local newspaper carried a very interesting article yesterday, originally written by the New York Times (I believe), about why the increase in those choosing exemptions from vaccinations is raising alarms within the medical community. I think what struck me the most, and that has not entered the conversation here, is that some 25% (if I recall correctly) of those recently infected in a southern California measels outbreak were too young to have been vaccinated. It is all fine and good to rely on the effect of the majority around you being vaccinated, and to say you are willing to take that risk within your family, but what about those infants and toddlers that now become exposed, who would not have otherwise? The outbreaks do NOT, apparently, only infect those who choose not to vaccinate; they also infect the most vulnerable members of our society. I had never considered this, to be honest. I will still hold to the right of individual families to make decisions within their own value system, but the idea that infants and toddlers outside the family are put at risk by that choice needs to be understood and very heavily weighted.
I would provide a link but I could not quickly find the article. Perhaps someone else can.
_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).