Page 17 of 27 [ 430 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 ... 27  Next

Gedrene
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jul 2011
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,725

23 Sep 2011, 11:26 am

AlanTuring wrote:
Gedrene wrote:
AlanTuring wrote:
I have had it with you, however - I will not spend any time attempting to satisfy your demands.

Satisfying my demands? I hope you understand that Cornflake has asked for exactly the same thing as I did and to be honest why wouldn't you prove your statements? You were doing exactly the same thing as ci, reporting proof and not actually giving proof. You didn't accept it when ci did it so don't you try and make this out that I am creating some special demand when I ask you to do the same thing yourself.

You aren't special you know, so you can't tell me to do to you what we both do with other people.

If people want to stamp their feet on the floor any more because I wont stop replying how they say doesn't make sense then they should learn to deal with it rather than whinge.

Nonsense.

Is it nonsense that you said that when ci only reported proof that it wasn't good enough? Is it nonsense that right now you have not actually given any links to proof and all you have done is said that there is proof? You have no reason to say nonsense Alan Turing. Don't tar anything for no reason.

AlanTuring wrote:
I'll go back through tambourine-man's posts on AFF when I can stomach it again. Right now, I've had far too much of him - dozens of hours in the past few weeks.

Oh come on. They're forum posts by a guy you haven't even proven is bad yet. By the way when you said you were going to disprove all of the statements made by autism Speaks you still haven't gotten to that yet. Are we having a trend here?

AlanTuring wrote:
[My comment to you was apparently too subtle. I've tired of your constant attacks on Zeraeph and others, especially since they appear to be without cause.

I respect Cornflake and take his requests seriously.

Oh? Really? I attacked Zerpaeh? I have been telling Zeraeph all this time that she's had no reason to condemn someone without proof. I would like to see where you can show where I attacked Zeraeph, unless of course you are just taking what she is saying for granted.

Are you willfully disregarding where Zeraeph attacked and was condescending to me? I guess you'd want proof too. Sure, I'll do it.



Gedrene
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jul 2011
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,725

23 Sep 2011, 11:35 am

Nexus wrote:
Gedrene wrote:
Nexus wrote:
Er, all I see at worse is harsh criticism. The kind that you'll see in extremely heated politics. Bullying? Please, if that's bullying someone needs to lurk moar on the internet srsly.

Not him, other people. Do you need me to link where people made bullying statements towards Tambourine? Also just because something happens on the internet it doesn't change the definition of bullying. Or do you mean bullying as defined by rapacious trolls? I guess that would be the sort of definition made by someone telling me to 'lurk moar'.


>>Implying I'm troll. Not that I've ever denied it though. Besides if one can't handle aggressive detractors they're not cut out for the world of PR.


No, this isn't about agressive detractors, this is about demagogy and lying. it is about assaulting someone and calling them condescending because they posted an interview that they had with autism speaks. In the end it is nothing more than a cowardly attack by people who have a deep-seated and irrational hatred of something that they can only bring it upon themselves to call someone names for having exposed them to someone's views and not use it as an actual opportunity to do something right.

And anyways why would I need to imply that you're saomething when you're not denying it? Then I am just referring to you as you see yourself. So yeah, great one.



Zeraeph
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Aug 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 592

23 Sep 2011, 11:40 am

AlanTuring wrote:
Cornflake wrote:
I'd be grateful if either of you would post some outstanding "for example" links.
Thanks.

It is the cumulative effect of reading Tamborine-Man's posts on AFF - no small set of links could come close to letting you see what this guy is really up to.

If you want to pursue it, go to AFF, go to the forums, choose the General forum, and start reading threads started by tambourine-man.

I'm sorry there doesn't seem to be a short path to understanding what is going on. I've now read nearly all of the posts he's written on both Wrong Planet and AFF. Only by doing so was I able to get my head around what he wants, how he is going about getting it, and what he is willing to do to get it.


I totally agree with this, there just isn't another way to see it...

As you can see from bits I posted before I was actually scanning the threads for specific further information without noticing most of this - I just read it thoroughly instead last night and was appalled (and not a little embarassed that I had stood up for him).



AlanTuring
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 3 Jul 2011
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 302
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota, USA

23 Sep 2011, 11:40 am

Gedrene - I don't have time for your games.

Believe it or not, I have a life - I work, I relax, I read, I write, I do research on algorithms, I play with my cats, and I spend time with a few friends.

I'll gather evidence when I can and with the priorities I establish.

I said that gathering, evaluating, and presenting evidence against Autism Speaks would take place over a few years. Deal with it. I'll have to go through several snapshots of their website over the years as a starting point - that will take months.

I am not going to reread Tambourine-Man's posts on AFF today just to satisfy your strident demands. I'll do what I can when I am able to face that stuff again.

I have no intention of replying to your demands or attacks unless whimsy moves me to do so.


_________________
Diagnosed: OCD, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Dysthemia
Undiagnosed: AS (Aspie: 176/200, NT: 37/200)
High functioning, software engineer, algorithms, cats, books


Nexus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Aug 2006
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 833
Location: On I2

23 Sep 2011, 11:46 am

Gedrene wrote:
Nexus wrote:
Gedrene wrote:
Nexus wrote:
Er, all I see at worse is harsh criticism. The kind that you'll see in extremely heated politics. Bullying? Please, if that's bullying someone needs to lurk moar on the internet srsly.

Not him, other people. Do you need me to link where people made bullying statements towards Tambourine? Also just because something happens on the internet it doesn't change the definition of bullying. Or do you mean bullying as defined by rapacious trolls? I guess that would be the sort of definition made by someone telling me to 'lurk moar'.


>>Implying I'm troll. Not that I've ever denied it though. Besides if one can't handle aggressive detractors they're not cut out for the world of PR.


No, this isn't about agressive detractors, this is about demagogy and lying. it is about assaulting someone and calling them condescending because they posted an interview that they had with autism speaks. In the end it is nothing more than a cowardly attack by people who have a deep-seated and irrational hatred of something that they can only bring it upon themselves to call someone names for having exposed them to someone's views and not use it as an actual opportunity to do something right.

And anyways why would I need to imply that you're saomething when you're not denying it? Then I am just referring to you as you see yourself. So yeah, great one.


:lol:

And this all concerns you so passionately because? You're making yourself sound suspicious now as you've obsessive tendency to jump for Autism Speak's defence is becoming obvious. Why have such a personal investment into this, are you involved with Autism Speaks or contributed to the interview? Because you certainly making yourself sound like you are. If not, no offence but you're coming off as an agent.


_________________
"Have a nice apocalypse" - Southland Tales


Gedrene
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jul 2011
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,725

23 Sep 2011, 11:48 am

AlanTuring wrote:
Gedrene - I don't have time for your games.

I am not playing games at all. I am telling you to give proof for your accusations. That isn't a game. Don't pass it off as one.

AlanTuring wrote:
I said that gathering, evaluating, and presenting evidence against Autism Speaks would take place over a few years.

What? It doesn't take years to disprove what Autism Speaks just said for a start. Did you actually say that? I better check.
AlanTuring wrote:
Deal with it.


AlanTuring wrote:
I'll have to go through several snapshots of their website over the years as a starting point - that will take months.

If presumably you can take snapshots of different years of autism speak's website in a smaller timeframe then it shouldn't take months.

AlanTuring wrote:
I am not going to reread Tambourine-Man's posts on AFF today just to satisfy your strident demands.

The strident demand being prove what accusations you make of other people. Does that mean you were strident with ci? Of course it doesn't. So I wasn't strident with you.
AlanTuring wrote:
I'll do what I can when I am able to face that stuff again.

I have no intention of replying to your demands or attacks unless whimsy moves me to do so.

Demands which are absolutely justified, such as 'prove what you say'. Attacks like... well actually no attacks at all so far since you have provided no evidence and I have no idea what you're talking about.



Zeraeph
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Aug 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 592

23 Sep 2011, 11:48 am

Gedrene wrote:
Are you willfully disregarding where Zeraeph attacked and was condescending to me? I guess you'd want proof too. Sure, I'll do it.


I think he means where I got tired of his obsessional attacks getting in the way of discussion...and pointed out this is what he really means:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPudE8nDog0[/youtube]

It was actually very naughty and childish of me and I shouldn't have done it...I am well old enough to know better.

But, in mitigation, it *IS* true, and it did shut him up and stop him derailing the thread (that "other people" MIGHT like to use to discuss the actual topic on instead) for an hour or so.



Gedrene
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jul 2011
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,725

23 Sep 2011, 11:52 am

Zeraeph wrote:
Gedrene wrote:
Are you willfully disregarding where Zeraeph attacked and was condescending to me? I guess you'd want proof too. Sure, I'll do it.


I think he means where I got tired of his obsessional attacks getting in the way of discussion...and pointed out this is what he really means:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPudE8nDog0[/youtube]

It was actually very naughty and childish of me and I shouldn't have done it...I am well old enough to know better.

But, in mitigation, it *IS* true, and it did shut him up and stop him derailing the thread (that "other people" MIGHT like to use to discuss the actual topic on instead) for an hour or so.

It isn't true at all. I don't have any feelings for you at all, good or bad. I treat you the same as anyone else on here as I do with anyone. The only thing that changes what I say is the person I am responding to. To propose that you know so far in to my mind that you'd think of the reason you did is twisted. Eurgh, I can't believe you would actually think I had a personal interest in you, positive or negative. I think you took the comments moog said about us being like an old couple too far

So in fact what you said was just naughty and childish, your words by the way, not mine. And so far all you have done is accuse Tambourine man of various things, and his family, and his home environment. So yeah, not a discussion. And as for derailing the thread I'll show you the post that derailed the thread:

Zeraeph wrote:
Last I saw you and your kid sister had started addressing people as if they were dirt between your toes to be instructed and ordered. People objected, that certainly is not bullying.

How on EARTH did you expect them to react?

With meek obedience to your natural superiority perhaps?

Forget it, you are not some special elite you know...there is not one rule for you and one rule for the rest of the world.

You kept going on as if you were some kind of Autism Kissinger, as if you had done us the great favour of "brokering a peace" with Autism Speaks, but you forgot a couple of things.

*You forgot to ask whether anyone wanted a peace with Autism Speaks - if you hadn't you would have found out that most of us want absolutely nothing to do with them.
*You forgot that we are pretty smart people in our own rights who do our own thinking and make our own choices just as well as you can.
*You forgot that most of us made sure we have good reasons to hold Autism Speaks in zero regard and already know that there is no reason to change.

I am glad the article was taken down, because it really is just PR bumpf and backhanded advertising for Autism Speaks, and gives a very wrong impression of the ethos of AFF by appearing on the front page.

This time yesterday I would also have been sorry for you that it was gone, but you morphed into such a condescending brat that I just cannot find a way to care today.

I hope you will grow up some day.


And there the thread basically became an eight page slog where you and alanturing have been slagging off Tambourine man. As for what you said here I already had a response for it done. It's on page 11 or 10 I think.

Given your insistence on talking to me directly and your accusations that people can't do what anyone is allowed to do because you're equal to them, you have no reason to say someone is enforcing meek obedience at all.



Last edited by Gedrene on 23 Sep 2011, 12:05 pm, edited 4 times in total.

b9
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Aug 2008
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,003
Location: australia

23 Sep 2011, 11:53 am

if you reduced your temperature to - 273 degrees, then you could be "SUPERCONDUCTING AN INTERVIEW WITH AUTISM SPEAKS".
sorry (i suppose).



Gedrene
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jul 2011
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,725

23 Sep 2011, 12:00 pm

b9 wrote:
if you reduced your temperature to - 273 degrees, then you could be "SUPERCONDUCTING AN INTERVIEW WITH AUTISM SPEAKS".
sorry (i suppose).

Lawl, thanks for relieving the tension a bit.



b9
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Aug 2008
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,003
Location: australia

23 Sep 2011, 1:12 pm

Gedrene wrote:
b9 wrote:
if you reduced your temperature to - 273 degrees, then you could be "SUPERCONDUCTING AN INTERVIEW WITH AUTISM SPEAKS".
sorry (i suppose).

Lawl, thanks for relieving the tension a bit.


how condescending of you. what does "lawl" mean?



Gedrene
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jul 2011
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,725

23 Sep 2011, 1:20 pm

b9 wrote:
Gedrene wrote:
b9 wrote:
if you reduced your temperature to - 273 degrees, then you could be "SUPERCONDUCTING AN INTERVIEW WITH AUTISM SPEAKS".
sorry (i suppose).

Lawl, thanks for relieving the tension a bit.


how condescending of you. what does "lawl" mean?

How is thanks for relieving the tension condescending? Unless you were thinking that I was being sarcastic, which I wasn't. I was saying thanks.
Also lawl is just another way of saying lol, short for laugh out loud



Cornflake
Administrator
Administrator

User avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 70,666
Location: Over there

23 Sep 2011, 1:57 pm

Ok. I've been busy...

This is a listing of all AFF threads started by user 'tambourine-man':
http://www.aspiesforfreedom.com/search. ... 516b4a5419

#1 "A link to an article I wrote for Heartspring's Worldwide Autism Resource"
http://www.heartspring.org/care/blogpos ... -my-latest
Nice to Meet You, Can We Talk About My Latest Obsessions?
-- Nicely written and a typical "this is what it's like" description as may be found on WP.
The comments are positive too.

From the comments to that blog: http://www.nakedcitywichita.com/2011/08 ... l-my-life/
where have i been all my life
-- Much the same thing as above, and the part about the antique diving suit particularly resonated with me.

From the comments to that story: http://www.heartspring.org/care/blog
Inside Out: Through the Eyes of Autism
-- Excellent, and I've bookmarked it too.

Love, Asperger Syndrome and the Big Apple
-- I enjoyed reading it. Maybe a little hackneyed in parts ("her pale green eyes glowing in the dim lamplight"), but then again he's not a gnarled, gin-swigging author with years of experience.

#2 "Does anyone else find movies like Adam to be really annoying?"
-- Seems to be pretty typical thread chatter about a few Autism-related films.

#3 "He Touched Me: or The Misadventures of an Aspie in Church"
-- A good story which made me laugh.
Comments are positive.

#4 "All God's Children: Celebrating Diversity in Neurology"
-- A really nice observation.
First comment: "These articles really give this site a kind of vibrance that I've never seen it have. It's really great work and I mean that."
Second comment (from an administrator) "That's why I'm sticking them up on the front page."
Later, a perfectly reasonable suggestion from Scotty: "I think it would be cool if there was a News and Features column immediately visible on the homepage, with photos and links to the articles (the links would make it easier to find the articles without scrolling down, and the articles wouldn't have to be on the front page in their entirety, maybe just a teaser...)"

#5 "Six Beloved Fictional Characters with Undiagnosed Mental Disorders"
-- A two-post thread, speculating on the Aspie status of fictional characters.
Obviously a joke.

#6 "Two genes associated with autism have been located..."
-- Starts with a link to a page on "The Australian", which opens with: "RESEARCHERS have for the first time identified two biologically different strains of autism in a major breakthrough being compared with the discovery of different forms of cancer in the 1960s."
Subsequent comments then ridicule the reported claims. Scotty posts "What kills me, is that these articles are always written with such a chipper and helpful tone. No one reading this, who isn't otherwise informed, would ever know the difference."

#7 "Love, Asperger Syndrome, and the Big Apple"
-- (same story as linked via #1)
Supportive, humourous comments.

#8 "Speaking and Listening"
-- Announcing the likely posting date of the Autism Speaks interview, with an introductory post.
The er, "fun" starts with post 16 from cynara querying how a post was deleted, and the tone changes suddenly at post 23. cynara (at least) seems to be feeling threatened.
At post 31, Scotty offers an explanation of his unrequested post deleting abilities.
At post 36, user 'Bloke' objects to the whole introductory post and picks it apart.
At post 50, user 'Kakapo' claims Scotty is the anti-christ. Apparently seriously.
At post 53, cynara tells user 'Halfspie' to "STFU. The ability to remove your posts is not allowed for a reason. Use a little brain function to think about it instead of taking the piss and you would realise why."
Between these rather aggressive posts are some positive comments.

#9 "Report from the DSM-V Work Group"
-- Appears to be a straightforward discussion over 7 posts.

#10 "Autism Speaks"
-- The interview is posted.
First comment (from an administrator) says: "Excuse me whilst I overdose on Doubleplusungoodspeak."
There are some positive comments but eventually the whole thread collapses into (I'm paraphrasing) cries of "they're lying", general libel, and attacks on Scotty and his sister.
Throughout this, some users still attempt to indicate the positive aspects of engaging with Autism Speaks but they're drowned out.
(also an administrator posts (WRT post deletions) "Don't do that again; Only Mod and upwards are supposed to be able to remove posts." - as if this is Scotty's fault?)
Throughout, Scotty largely keeps to the positive approach but is forced into defence mode eventually.
The thread ends up locked on post 183 by an administrator.


Now, have I missed something here? Please point it out to me if I have.
I just see very likeable and incredibly enthusiastic young guy with a burgeoning talent for writing which is apparently well-liked - until what's seemingly the "unforgivable sin" of publishing what Autism Speaks has to say is committed, when all hell breaks loose.
Where was he "bad" - I mean really, genuinely bad enough to warrant the treatment he's received here and at AFF?


(I have to go and eat now - this has taken hours... :oops: )


_________________
Giraffe: a ruminant with a view.


Duckfetishgirl
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 15 May 2009
Age: 170
Gender: Female
Posts: 43

23 Sep 2011, 2:03 pm

tambourine-man has good intentions and I don't think his sisters comment was intended to be offensive. I certainly didn't take it that way. I think we all say things especially as aspies that can be taken the wrong way. I have been yelled at and bullied for saying the wrong thing without meaning to. I have given compliments only to be told it was an insult and not understanding why it was. I think she should be given the benefit of the doubt.



Gedrene
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jul 2011
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,725

23 Sep 2011, 2:07 pm

Cornflake wrote:
Ok. I've been busy...

This is a listing of all AFF threads started by user 'tambourine-man':
http://www.aspiesforfreedom.com/search. ... 516b4a5419

#1 "A link to an article I wrote for Heartspring's Worldwide Autism Resource"
http://www.heartspring.org/care/blogpos ... -my-latest
Nice to Meet You, Can We Talk About My Latest Obsessions?
-- Nicely written and a typical "this is what it's like" description as may be found on WP.
The comments are positive too.

From the comments to that blog: http://www.nakedcitywichita.com/2011/08 ... l-my-life/
where have i been all my life
-- Much the same thing as above, and the part about the antique diving suit particularly resonated with me.

From the comments to that story: http://www.heartspring.org/care/blog
Inside Out: Through the Eyes of Autism
-- Excellent, and I've bookmarked it too.

Love, Asperger Syndrome and the Big Apple
-- I enjoyed reading it. Maybe a little hackneyed in parts ("her pale green eyes glowing in the dim lamplight"), but then again he's not a gnarled, gin-swigging author with years of experience.

#2 "Does anyone else find movies like Adam to be really annoying?"
-- Seems to be pretty typical thread chatter about a few Autism-related films.

#3 "He Touched Me: or The Misadventures of an Aspie in Church"
-- A good story which made me laugh.
Comments are positive.

#4 "All God's Children: Celebrating Diversity in Neurology"
-- A really nice observation.
First comment: "These articles really give this site a kind of vibrance that I've never seen it have. It's really great work and I mean that."
Second comment (from an administrator) "That's why I'm sticking them up on the front page."
Later, a perfectly reasonable suggestion from Scotty: "I think it would be cool if there was a News and Features column immediately visible on the homepage, with photos and links to the articles (the links would make it easier to find the articles without scrolling down, and the articles wouldn't have to be on the front page in their entirety, maybe just a teaser...)"

#5 "Six Beloved Fictional Characters with Undiagnosed Mental Disorders"
-- A two-post thread, speculating on the Aspie status of fictional characters.
Obviously a joke.

#6 "Two genes associated with autism have been located..."
-- Starts with a link to a page on "The Australian", which opens with: "RESEARCHERS have for the first time identified two biologically different strains of autism in a major breakthrough being compared with the discovery of different forms of cancer in the 1960s."
Subsequent comments then ridicule the reported claims. Scotty posts "What kills me, is that these articles are always written with such a chipper and helpful tone. No one reading this, who isn't otherwise informed, would ever know the difference."

#7 "Love, Asperger Syndrome, and the Big Apple"
-- (same story as linked via #1)
Supportive, humourous comments.

#8 "Speaking and Listening"
-- Announcing the likely posting date of the Autism Speaks interview, with an introductory post.
The er, "fun" starts with post 16 from cynara querying how a post was deleted, and the tone changes suddenly at post 23. cynara (at least) seems to be feeling threatened.
At post 31, Scotty offers an explanation of his unrequested post deleting abilities.
At post 36, user 'Bloke' objects to the whole introductory post and picks it apart.
At post 50, user 'Kakapo' claims Scotty is the anti-christ. Apparently seriously.
At post 53, cynara tells user 'Halfspie' to "STFU. The ability to remove your posts is not allowed for a reason. Use a little brain function to think about it instead of taking the piss and you would realise why."
Between these rather aggressive posts are some positive comments.

#9 "Report from the DSM-V Work Group"
-- Appears to be a straightforward discussion over 7 posts.

#10 "Autism Speaks"
-- The interview is posted.
First comment (from an administrator) says: "Excuse me whilst I overdose on Doubleplusungoodspeak."
There are some positive comments but eventually the whole thread collapses into (I'm paraphrasing) cries of "they're lying", general libel, and attacks on Scotty and his sister.
Throughout this, some users still attempt to indicate the positive aspects of engaging with Autism Speaks but they're drowned out.
(also an administrator posts (WRT post deletions) "Don't do that again; Only Mod and upwards are supposed to be able to remove posts." - as if this is Scotty's fault?)
Throughout, Scotty largely keeps to the positive approach but is forced into defence mode eventually.
The thread ends up locked on post 183 by an administrator.


Now, have I missed something here? Please point it out to me if I have.
I just see very likeable and incredibly enthusiastic young guy with a burgeoning talent for writing which is apparently well-liked - until what's seemingly the "unforgivable sin" of publishing what Autism Speaks has to say is committed, when all hell breaks loose.
Where was he "bad" - I mean really, genuinely bad enough to warrant the treatment he's received here and at AFF?


(I have to go and eat now - this has taken hours... :oops: )

Well, and to think that the people who make the accusations couldn't actually bothered to make all of this up. I can only imagine that there will be silence, contrivance or intransigence to come... Unless of course there is someone who will say 'I'm sorry'



aghogday
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 2010
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,090

23 Sep 2011, 2:14 pm

Cornflake wrote:
Ok. I've been busy...

This is a listing of all AFF threads started by user 'tambourine-man':
http://www.aspiesforfreedom.com/search. ... 516b4a5419

#1 "A link to an article I wrote for Heartspring's Worldwide Autism Resource"
http://www.heartspring.org/care/blogpos ... -my-latest
Nice to Meet You, Can We Talk About My Latest Obsessions?
-- Nicely written and a typical "this is what it's like" description as may be found on WP.
The comments are positive too.

From the comments to that blog: http://www.nakedcitywichita.com/2011/08 ... l-my-life/
where have i been all my life
-- Much the same thing as above, and the part about the antique diving suit particularly resonated with me.

From the comments to that story: http://www.heartspring.org/care/blog
Inside Out: Through the Eyes of Autism
-- Excellent, and I've bookmarked it too.

Love, Asperger Syndrome and the Big Apple
-- I enjoyed reading it. Maybe a little hackneyed in parts ("her pale green eyes glowing in the dim lamplight"), but then again he's not a gnarled, gin-swigging author with years of experience.

#2 "Does anyone else find movies like Adam to be really annoying?"
-- Seems to be pretty typical thread chatter about a few Autism-related films.

#3 "He Touched Me: or The Misadventures of an Aspie in Church"
-- A good story which made me laugh.
Comments are positive.

#4 "All God's Children: Celebrating Diversity in Neurology"
-- A really nice observation.
First comment: "These articles really give this site a kind of vibrance that I've never seen it have. It's really great work and I mean that."
Second comment (from an administrator) "That's why I'm sticking them up on the front page."
Later, a perfectly reasonable suggestion from Scotty: "I think it would be cool if there was a News and Features column immediately visible on the homepage, with photos and links to the articles (the links would make it easier to find the articles without scrolling down, and the articles wouldn't have to be on the front page in their entirety, maybe just a teaser...)"

#5 "Six Beloved Fictional Characters with Undiagnosed Mental Disorders"
-- A two-post thread, speculating on the Aspie status of fictional characters.
Obviously a joke.

#6 "Two genes associated with autism have been located..."
-- Starts with a link to a page on "The Australian", which opens with: "RESEARCHERS have for the first time identified two biologically different strains of autism in a major breakthrough being compared with the discovery of different forms of cancer in the 1960s."
Subsequent comments then ridicule the reported claims. Scotty posts "What kills me, is that these articles are always written with such a chipper and helpful tone. No one reading this, who isn't otherwise informed, would ever know the difference."

#7 "Love, Asperger Syndrome, and the Big Apple"
-- (same story as linked via #1)
Supportive, humourous comments.

#8 "Speaking and Listening"
-- Announcing the likely posting date of the Autism Speaks interview, with an introductory post.
The er, "fun" starts with post 16 from cynara querying how a post was deleted, and the tone changes suddenly at post 23. cynara (at least) seems to be feeling threatened.
At post 31, Scotty offers an explanation of his unrequested post deleting abilities.
At post 36, user 'Bloke' objects to the whole introductory post and picks it apart.
At post 50, user 'Kakapo' claims Scotty is the anti-christ. Apparently seriously.
At post 53, cynara tells user 'Halfspie' to "STFU. The ability to remove your posts is not allowed for a reason. Use a little brain function to think about it instead of taking the piss and you would realise why."
Between these rather aggressive posts are some positive comments.

#9 "Report from the DSM-V Work Group"
-- Appears to be a straightforward discussion over 7 posts.

#10 "Autism Speaks"
-- The interview is posted.
First comment (from an administrator) says: "Excuse me whilst I overdose on Doubleplusungoodspeak."
There are some positive comments but eventually the whole thread collapses into (I'm paraphrasing) cries of "they're lying", general libel, and attacks on Scotty and his sister.
Throughout this, some users still attempt to indicate the positive aspects of engaging with Autism Speaks but they're drowned out.
(also an administrator posts (WRT post deletions) "Don't do that again; Only Mod and upwards are supposed to be able to remove posts." - as if this is Scotty's fault?)
Throughout, Scotty largely keeps to the positive approach but is forced into defence mode eventually.
The thread ends up locked on post 183 by an administrator.


Now, have I missed something here? Please point it out to me if I have.
I just see very likeable and incredibly enthusiastic young guy with a burgeoning talent for writing which is apparently well-liked - until what's seemingly the "unforgivable sin" of publishing what Autism Speaks has to say is committed, when all hell breaks loose.
Where was he "bad" - I mean really, genuinely bad enough to warrant the treatment he's received here and at AFF?


(I have to go and eat now - this has taken hours... :oops: )


Thanks Cornflake, I read the same information and came to the same conclusion. This internet site Wrong Planet, is an accepting one of different views, unlike some other websites.

When one of us is bullied others typically come to our defense, sometimes even if we don't personally like each other, and many times when we clash with views. I see that as what sets this site apart from others.

Tambourine man is a welcome member here, and those of us that see him as a valued member won't tolerate him being bullied, his personal character attacked, or his families character attacked like it was on AFF.

Hopefully he has not at this point felt bullied and censored off this site, as he was on the other site, for attempting to provide objective information about an organization that much controversy surrounds.

While his interview is no longer available on the front page of AFF, it is still available among the pages of this thread and the other current thread of discussion on this topic, in case anyone wants to read it and provide complaints or constructive criticism about the answers to the questions in the interview that Autism Speaks provided. The organization is paying attention to these threads, so it is an opportunity for individuals to let their concerns be known on relevant issues related to the organization.