Stop Bashing Autism Speaks!
I'd rather be accused of arguing about nothing than not arguing when the truth can be found. I don't thing aghogday would disagree with that either.
You'd be surprised. When it comes to dealing with obsessive hyper-republican obama-haters we do a pretty good job of not bothering each other and dealing with the people at hand.
For starters I wasn't talking about a deficiency in comprehension ever and I wasn't debating the idea that one doesn't need inference to understand metaphors or anything. You're just talking in circles now to be honest.
Back up an opinion? A definition isn't an opinion. it's your opinion that abstraction has anything to do with inference or metahors or figurative language. It's faith because you put faith in sources of official sites even when what they say is logically impossible. Apparently you say inference is abstract reasoning, not layered thinking like how I said.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstraction
That isn't inference, that's comprehension.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ ... t+thinking
By the way, this is an american source
These have to do with calling a cat a cat, knowing that a drawridge doesn't allow people to cross itwhen it's up and knowing how to call something good and evil. This is abstraction, abstract thinking, not this pseudo-abstraction that you are trying to say is abstraction, a simply superfluous system of layered wordplay that people shouldn't use outside of art.
And I haven't given a damn whether you think it is or not because my only sticking point is that inference and metaphor are not abstraction or abstract reasoning. And you just added in that comprehension one too. You're tripping over yourself again.
I'm not suggesting that either inference, metaphor/figurative language, or comprehension are abstract reasoning. I don't have a disagreement with you on that part. My assertion, per the description of abstract reasoning which includes skills that are related to it, backed up by two sources, provides evidence that the inference and comprehension required to use metaphors for problem solving is a skill of abstract reasoning.
I don't disagree with your basic definitions of abstraction and abstract thinking, provided by Wiki and free dictionary, but they don't give examples of the skills/tasks in life that are related to abstract reasoning that are available both on reference.com and about.com.
Difficulties in understanding figurative language such as metaphors and being able to use them in solving problems is a skill of abstract reasoning that I provided two sources of evidence for, that they are difficulties commonly seen in autism.
Autistic people commonly do very well in concrete reasoning skills. The same source that provided the skills in the last post related to abstract reasoning also provides the skills related to concrete reasoning:
http://learningdisabilities.about.com/od/glossar1/g/concretereason.htm
The ability to analyze information and solve problems on a literal level. Concrete reasoning tasks involve skills such as:
•Basic knowledge of names of objects, places, and people;
•Understanding of basic cause and effect relationships;
•Solving problems that have clear processes and logical solutions; and typically
•Do not involve theory, metaphor, or complex analogy.
http://learningdisabilities.about.com/od/glossar1/g/abstractreason.htm
Definition Abstract Reasoning:
The ability to analyze information and solve problems on a complex, thought-based level is sometimes referred to as abstract reasoning. Abstract reasoning tasks involve skills such as:
•Forming theories about the nature of objects, ideas, processes, and problem solving;
•Understanding subjects on a complex level through analysis and evaluation;
•Ability to apply knowledge in problem-solving using theory, metaphor, or complex analogy; and
•Understanding relationships between verbal and non-verbal ideas.
Makes logical sense to me: difficulties in abstract communication follow difficulties in abstract thought, as well as literal communication follows literal thought.
When emotion or understanding of emotion is limited, sensory feeling can motivate one through life. It seem very possible that hypo/hypersensitivity could be related to this.
Thank you! I keep thinking this thread is supposed to be funny.
Hypersensitivity and hyposensitivity are, indeed, very real issues.
_________________
You may know me from my column here on WrongPlanet. I'm also writing a book for AAPC. Visit my Facebook page for links to articles I've written for Autism Speaks and other websites.
http://www.facebook.com/pages/JohnScott ... 8723228267
There is no need to bash autism speaks, when another disagreement is available.
I don't think I've ever seen anyone do it in PPR. Politics, Philosophy, and Religion, have been synonymous with the topic of Autism Speaks in the past, as far as what raises ire in people, here on this site.
It appears that we may be joining the rest of the world, where one can always expect a good argument on politics, philosophy and religion, and not necessasrily expect one on autism speaks. ![]()
Capture bonding gone wrong guys?
Autism speaks has ruined things for itself, and only has itself to blame
Now, hiring this PR rock star dude with a kid sister...just buries their fake niceness and impropriety deeper into the psyche of the autistic community
Good work team. Lets go!
I'd rather be accused of arguing about nothing than not arguing when the truth can be found. I don't thing aghogday would disagree with that either.
You'd be surprised. When it comes to dealing with obsessive hyper-republican obama-haters we do a pretty good job of not bothering each other and dealing with the people at hand.
_________________
Forever gone
Sorry I ever joined
Were we? I think saying about whether we are good at abstract reasoning counts as cause-like. It also was what we were talking about. I'd like to talk about the dearth of root causes but if I wasn't discussing it then I can't just switch to it.
Also I was giving an example of us complementing eachother.
@gedrene,ok i can see from your viewpoint that one must first establish a existence of deficet in abstract thinking before one looks for its root cause.like my previous analogy you cant find the root cause of a fire that was never set.as far as whether you guys where or wernt complimenting each other,i never said you werent.if i was acting like a liason i would have dealt with that in a private message.yes i was picking on you and aghogday but in friendly affectionate manor
_________________
Forever gone
Sorry I ever joined
I understand. You see I just happen to have had quite a few jocular comments thrown my way during the whole thread. It made me more willing to explain myself.
Ha ha. Very nice!
_________________
You may know me from my column here on WrongPlanet. I'm also writing a book for AAPC. Visit my Facebook page for links to articles I've written for Autism Speaks and other websites.
http://www.facebook.com/pages/JohnScott ... 8723228267
