Page 17 of 42 [ 664 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 ... 42  Next

Gedrene
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jul 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,725

30 Oct 2011, 6:16 pm

vermontsavant wrote:
i hope you guys never choose careers as arson investigaters.you would never find the source of the fire and would spend all your time bicking about what has been burnt.dificulties in abstract communication follow dificulties in abstract thought.i will give you two words that are the source of the metaphorical fire.hypersensitivity and hyposensitivity.the two most crucial words in autistic psychology.for those who mock my intilect once again im right

I'd rather be accused of arguing about nothing than not arguing when the truth can be found. I don't thing aghogday would disagree with that either.

You'd be surprised. When it comes to dealing with obsessive hyper-republican obama-haters we do a pretty good job of not bothering each other and dealing with the people at hand.



Inventor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,014
Location: New Orleans

30 Oct 2011, 9:28 pm

There is a place for that, PPR, this thread is about Autism.

In particular the choice to bash or not Autism Speaks.



aghogday
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 2010
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,322

30 Oct 2011, 10:29 pm

Gedrene wrote:
aghogday wrote:
inference and comprehension are required to understand and use metaphors/figurative language

For starters I wasn't talking about a deficiency in comprehension ever and I wasn't debating the idea that one doesn't need inference to understand metaphors or anything. You're just talking in circles now to be honest.

aghogday wrote:
While I understand that it is your opinion that difficulties in abstract reasoning aren't part of Autism, can you find any source anywhere that backs up your opinion? You suggest I am basing what I state on faith, where I have presented evidence instead of opinion.

Back up an opinion? A definition isn't an opinion. it's your opinion that abstraction has anything to do with inference or metahors or figurative language. It's faith because you put faith in sources of official sites even when what they say is logically impossible. Apparently you say inference is abstract reasoning, not layered thinking like how I said.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstraction
TheWiki wrote:
Abstraction is a process by which higher concepts are derived from the usage and classification of literal ("real" or "concrete") concepts, first principles, or other methods.

That isn't inference, that's comprehension.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ ... t+thinking
dictionary.com wrote:
abstract thinking n. Thinking characterized by the ability to use concepts and to make and understand generalizations, such as of the properties or pattern shared by a variety of specific items or events.

By the way, this is an american source


These have to do with calling a cat a cat, knowing that a drawridge doesn't allow people to cross itwhen it's up and knowing how to call something good and evil. This is abstraction, abstract thinking, not this pseudo-abstraction that you are trying to say is abstraction, a simply superfluous system of layered wordplay that people shouldn't use outside of art.


aghogday wrote:
I've provided a great deal of evidence to support that difficulties with abstract reasoning, comprehension, inference, metaphors/figurative language is a common problem in Autism.

And I haven't given a damn whether you think it is or not because my only sticking point is that inference and metaphor are not abstraction or abstract reasoning. And you just added in that comprehension one too. You're tripping over yourself again.


I'm not suggesting that either inference, metaphor/figurative language, or comprehension are abstract reasoning. I don't have a disagreement with you on that part. My assertion, per the description of abstract reasoning which includes skills that are related to it, backed up by two sources, provides evidence that the inference and comprehension required to use metaphors for problem solving is a skill of abstract reasoning.

I don't disagree with your basic definitions of abstraction and abstract thinking, provided by Wiki and free dictionary, but they don't give examples of the skills/tasks in life that are related to abstract reasoning that are available both on reference.com and about.com.

Difficulties in understanding figurative language such as metaphors and being able to use them in solving problems is a skill of abstract reasoning that I provided two sources of evidence for, that they are difficulties commonly seen in autism.

Autistic people commonly do very well in concrete reasoning skills. The same source that provided the skills in the last post related to abstract reasoning also provides the skills related to concrete reasoning:

http://learningdisabilities.about.com/od/glossar1/g/concretereason.htm


Quote:
Definition: Concrete Reasoning:
The ability to analyze information and solve problems on a literal level. Concrete reasoning tasks involve skills such as:

•Basic knowledge of names of objects, places, and people;
•Understanding of basic cause and effect relationships;
•Solving problems that have clear processes and logical solutions; and typically
•Do not involve theory, metaphor, or complex analogy.



http://learningdisabilities.about.com/od/glossar1/g/abstractreason.htm

Quote:

Definition Abstract Reasoning:
The ability to analyze information and solve problems on a complex, thought-based level is sometimes referred to as abstract reasoning. Abstract reasoning tasks involve skills such as:

•Forming theories about the nature of objects, ideas, processes, and problem solving;
•Understanding subjects on a complex level through analysis and evaluation;
•Ability to apply knowledge in problem-solving using theory, metaphor, or complex analogy; and
•Understanding relationships between verbal and non-verbal ideas.



aghogday
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 2010
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,322

30 Oct 2011, 10:43 pm

vermontsavant wrote:
i hope you guys never choose careers as arson investigaters.you would never find the source of the fire and would spend all your time bicking about what has been burnt.dificulties in abstract communication follow dificulties in abstract thought.i will give you two words that are the source of the metaphorical fire.hypersensitivity and hyposensitivity.the two most crucial words in autistic psychology.for those who mock my intilect once again im right


Makes logical sense to me: difficulties in abstract communication follow difficulties in abstract thought, as well as literal communication follows literal thought.

When emotion or understanding of emotion is limited, sensory feeling can motivate one through life. It seem very possible that hypo/hypersensitivity could be related to this.



Tambourine-Man
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Aug 2011
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 715

30 Oct 2011, 10:59 pm

vermontsavant wrote:
i hope you guys never choose careers as arson investigaters.you would never find the source of the fire and would spend all your time bicking about what has been burnt.dificulties in abstract communication follow dificulties in abstract thought.i will give you two words that are the source of the metaphorical fire.hypersensitivity and hyposensitivity.the two most crucial words in autistic psychology.for those who mock my intilect once again im right


Thank you! I keep thinking this thread is supposed to be funny.

Hypersensitivity and hyposensitivity are, indeed, very real issues.


_________________
You may know me from my column here on WrongPlanet. I'm also writing a book for AAPC. Visit my Facebook page for links to articles I've written for Autism Speaks and other websites.
http://www.facebook.com/pages/JohnScott ... 8723228267


aghogday
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 2010
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,322

30 Oct 2011, 11:21 pm

There is no need to bash autism speaks, when another disagreement is available. :)

I don't think I've ever seen anyone do it in PPR. Politics, Philosophy, and Religion, have been synonymous with the topic of Autism Speaks in the past, as far as what raises ire in people, here on this site.

It appears that we may be joining the rest of the world, where one can always expect a good argument on politics, philosophy and religion, and not necessasrily expect one on autism speaks. :)



Surfman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Aug 2010
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,938
Location: Homeward bound

31 Oct 2011, 2:51 am

Capture bonding gone wrong guys?

Autism speaks has ruined things for itself, and only has itself to blame

Now, hiring this PR rock star dude with a kid sister...just buries their fake niceness and impropriety deeper into the psyche of the autistic community

Good work team. Lets go!



vermontsavant
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,110
Location: Left WP forever

31 Oct 2011, 3:10 am

Gedrene wrote:
vermontsavant wrote:
i hope you guys never choose careers as arson investigaters.you would never find the source of the fire and would spend all your time bicking about what has been burnt.dificulties in abstract communication follow dificulties in abstract thought.i will give you two words that are the source of the metaphorical fire.hypersensitivity and hyposensitivity.the two most crucial words in autistic psychology.for those who mock my intilect once again im right

I'd rather be accused of arguing about nothing than not arguing when the truth can be found. I don't thing aghogday would disagree with that either.

You'd be surprised. When it comes to dealing with obsessive hyper-republican obama-haters we do a pretty good job of not bothering each other and dealing with the people at hand.
i wasnt saying you were arguing over nothing.i said you were over focusing on symtoms not root causes.what does the presidential have to do with this


_________________
Forever gone
Sorry I ever joined


Gedrene
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jul 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,725

31 Oct 2011, 3:32 am

vermontsavant wrote:
i wasnt saying you were arguing over nothing.i said you were over focusing on symtoms not root causes.what does the presidential have to do with this

Were we? I think saying about whether we are good at abstract reasoning counts as cause-like. It also was what we were talking about. I'd like to talk about the dearth of root causes but if I wasn't discussing it then I can't just switch to it.

Also I was giving an example of us complementing eachother.



vermontsavant
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,110
Location: Left WP forever

31 Oct 2011, 3:47 am

@gedrene,ok i can see from your viewpoint that one must first establish a existence of deficet in abstract thinking before one looks for its root cause.like my previous analogy you cant find the root cause of a fire that was never set.as far as whether you guys where or wernt complimenting each other,i never said you werent.if i was acting like a liason i would have dealt with that in a private message.yes i was picking on you and aghogday but in friendly affectionate manor


_________________
Forever gone
Sorry I ever joined


Gedrene
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jul 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,725

31 Oct 2011, 3:53 am

vermontsavant wrote:
@gedrene,ok i can see from your viewpoint that one must first establish a existence of deficet in abstract thinking before one looks for its root cause.like my previous analogy you cant find the root cause of a fire that was never set.as far as whether you guys where or wernt complimenting each other,i never said you werent.if i was acting like a liason i would have dealt with that in a private message.yes i was picking on you and aghogday but in friendly affectionate manor

I understand. You see I just happen to have had quite a few jocular comments thrown my way during the whole thread. It made me more willing to explain myself.



vermontsavant
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,110
Location: Left WP forever

31 Oct 2011, 4:02 am

what does jocular mean exactly


_________________
Forever gone
Sorry I ever joined


Gedrene
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jul 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,725

31 Oct 2011, 4:06 am

vermontsavant wrote:
what does jocular mean exactly

It's when you say something that traditionally might be critical or even offensive, but how it's intended means that it is understood as a joke.

Good heavens, we're talking about inferences! So much for pitt.



Surfman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Aug 2010
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,938
Location: Homeward bound

31 Oct 2011, 8:34 am

My kid sister, Jeffi, stands overlooking this bizarre scene, awaiting my instructions. I fiddle



Tambourine-Man
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Aug 2011
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 715

31 Oct 2011, 11:39 am

Surfman wrote:
My kid sister, Jeffi, stands overlooking this bizarre scene, awaiting my instructions. I fiddle


Ha ha. Very nice!


_________________
You may know me from my column here on WrongPlanet. I'm also writing a book for AAPC. Visit my Facebook page for links to articles I've written for Autism Speaks and other websites.
http://www.facebook.com/pages/JohnScott ... 8723228267


Gedrene
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jul 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,725

31 Oct 2011, 12:25 pm

Surfman wrote:
My kid sister, Jeffi, stands overlooking this bizarre scene, awaiting my instructions. I fiddle

The fiddle was invented long after Nero lived. Shows how much control one has over the situation.