Page 5 of 20 [ 311 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 20  Next


In Reviewing the New "Autism Speaks" Website:
It is evident that they are evolving in a positive direction in response to input from the Autistic Community. 30%  30%  [ 10 ]
There is no change that I can see. 70%  70%  [ 23 ]
Total votes : 33

ci
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Nov 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,546
Location: Humboldt County, California

07 Aug 2011, 9:28 pm

It would be nice if other self-advocates challenged ASAN on just a few issues to find better solutions on certain key issues where they would tolerate others speaking in the best interest of myself.

Isolation advocacy in this news piece.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oouMQG3Oh6c[/youtube]

The abortion and asking for money at the same time was in this protest but the video now changed.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sUBfyfjIccA[/youtube]

I am also against people being offended by the puzzle piece as they seem to go against it simply because some organizations that are popular that they disagree with use it. Autism was and is a puzzle others were trying to figure out to help. So now I use a 3d autism puzzle as the logo of my organization to create solutions as the solution are pieces of the grand puzzle of change.

I disagree with being overtly offended to get my way when others seem to be trying to help. I think some people are just trying to control and gain power and it helps no one. For that reason I object and use the puzzle piece in my logo.


_________________
The peer politics creating intolerance toward compassion is coming to an end. Pity accusations, indifferent advocacy against isolation awareness and for pride in an image of autism is injustice. http://www.autismselfadvocacynetwork.com


Last edited by ci on 07 Aug 2011, 9:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Zeraeph
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Aug 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 592

07 Aug 2011, 9:29 pm

I did know he wouldn't answer either question before I asked them... :roll:



Zeraeph
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Aug 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 592

07 Aug 2011, 9:49 pm

Well I agree with pretty much everything in the first video and cannot for the life of me identify anything that could be correctly described as "Isolation Advocacy" in it...did you perhaps set up the wrong video?

I also agree with the second video, but as you claim it has been changed I have no way to know if I would agree with it in it's original form.

As far as the puzzle piece is concerned...by nature I do not let other people define me, so I cannot take being defined as a puzzle piece by idiots who do not even know me seriously, let alone personally. :D

HOWEVER, I do not think ANYONE has the right to define a group of other people against their wishes and without consulting them. A huge number of autistic people find the puzzle piece offensive and the fact that Autism Speaks genuinely couldn't care less about that is very telling.

The puzzle piece was, in fact, chosen by an ad agency to maximise the impact, influence and turnover of "Autism Speaks", and I think it should be pretty obvious to anyone that Autism Speaks is all about power and control, and nothing about genuinely trying to help at all. (This also applies to a great many other organisations)

What is not obvious to me is why you have more faith in "Autism Speaks" than you have in yourself, and I believe that is a serious mistake on your part.



aghogday
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 2010
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,094

07 Aug 2011, 10:14 pm

Zeraeph wrote:
ci wrote:
I do not wish to live as I do for the rest of my life nor expect many of the others in similar situations to do so as well.


Neither do I ci...though I accept now that I will, because there will be no realistic options in my lifetime...and that the only effect organisations like Autism Speaks will have on my life is to make it even worse...if they get a chance.

Maybe you should have paid slightly more attention to what I was actually saying and less to what aghogday was saying *about* me? :wink:

Don't tell him and spoil his fun, but I am not particularly with ASAN, and never said I was.

My efforts consist entirely in damage limitation in terms of the various organisations that feed off Autism Issues.

I am not a "people person" so I do not get involved in advocacy or support networks at all - it would just be a waste of time and energy. I leave it to those better suited to it. That is not a measure of approval or disapproval, just awareness of my own limitations.


You stated in a previous thread that you had a great deal to do with ASAN and was surprised that you hadn't come across KfisherX in the ASAN organization. I took what you said as literal truth, and that was what my comment was based on, per your post here:

http://www.wrongplanet.net/postxf160091-0-105.html

I don't have a problem with your viewpoints; you are not the only one that can't see a middle ground with autism speaks. The person that actually is involved with ASAN that came here saw reasonable middle ground as well as the two individuals associated with ASAN from the linked thread, that I think can reasonably be seen, when the emotion of the issues are separated from the facts.

I don't understand where you are getting some of the assertions you present though. The 300,000 dollar figure, and profits made off of Autistic medicaid funded residents, is nowhere to be found in the literature that I have seen. If you could find it and present it, I would gladly accept the evidence.

But, judging from your suggestion here that you don't get involved with advocacy organizations vs. the evidence from your statement in the linked thread, I wonder how serious you are with your assertions here about residential care costs for Autistics and excessive profits being made off of residential care for Autistics.

Apparently you are upset at the world for not having the answers for you in your lifetime that you need related to your disabling condition; I can relate to that emotion, as many can with all types of disabilities.

I think you are absolutely correct that the government is not going to help you in your lifetime; no need for me to try to explain why anymore to you since you have already accepted what seems like a reality.

I wouldn't have a problem with my taxpayer dollars going toward giving those like yourself a step up in life, that aren't disabled enough to get the help they need. Unfortunately, our country has become too diverse, complex, and distanced from those that live within it, to provide the help that could be provided, if it was supported.



ci
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Nov 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,546
Location: Humboldt County, California

07 Aug 2011, 10:24 pm

Zeraeph wrote:
Well I agree with pretty much everything in the first video and cannot for the life of me identify anything that could be correctly described as "Isolation Advocacy" in it...did you perhaps set up the wrong video?

I also agree with the second video, but as you claim it has been changed I have no way to know if I would agree with it in it's original form.

As far as the puzzle piece is concerned...by nature I do not let other people define me, so I cannot take being defined as a puzzle piece by idiots who do not even know me seriously, let alone personally. :D

HOWEVER, I do not think ANYONE has the right to define a group of other people against their wishes and without consulting them. A huge number of autistic people find the puzzle piece offensive and the fact that Autism Speaks genuinely couldn't care less about that is very telling.

The puzzle piece was, in fact, chosen by an ad agency to maximise the impact, influence and turnover of "Autism Speaks", and I think it should be pretty obvious to anyone that Autism Speaks is all about power and control, and nothing about genuinely trying to help at all. (This also applies to a great many other organisations)

What is not obvious to me is why you have more faith in "Autism Speaks" than you have in yourself, and I believe that is a serious mistake on your part.


Perhaps you do not like to see the obvious in the first video. In context to autism part of the advocacy was about removing the obsticle of isolation that people experience. ASAN obviously was more about a self-centered appeal to self-image and autism the disorder label then the harsh reality others experience in the disability sense. The priorities don't seem to line up with the best interest of others.

With regards to Autism Speaks and myself I had autism before Autism Speaks existed. You seem to be still stuck in a them vs. us mentality and attempting to pressure me on your side. I tend to take bits of each side choose for myself. I do not abide by peer pressure and never did in school as well. When you say many are it just adds up to a very very small minority of the whole who have an ingrained agenda more people hate them as people then actually is found in reality. The puzzle piece to me which was used in general in context to autism far before Autism Speaks simply implies something is puzzling. Innately there is nothing wrong with finding something puzzling and if they had figured more out when I was younger I think there would have been a better outcome. Being insulted at a puzzle piece to me is a bit to out their and not reasonable as far as common sense insults. I personally do not find it offensive and see it as constructive to purpose so as to find solutions with no specific organization implied and would find it more so the potential of special interest attempting to evade progress by establishment recklessly over such a small matter.

The puzzle of inclusion and improving lives should not be confronted by being insulted whenever it is convienant by a few that imagine such things into a simple symbol when it simply ends up being a false belief. Life is a puzzle to figure out. Autism is no different and as long as people mean well I find that considering it a symbol of hate and intolerance to be redicilious and made up to cause trouble to get attention and of which I must then question whether they mean well and are themselves a threat.


_________________
The peer politics creating intolerance toward compassion is coming to an end. Pity accusations, indifferent advocacy against isolation awareness and for pride in an image of autism is injustice. http://www.autismselfadvocacynetwork.com


aghogday
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 2010
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,094

07 Aug 2011, 10:36 pm

Zeraeph wrote:
I did know he wouldn't answer either question before I asked them... :roll:


I'm making a serious effort to answer your questions. I don't mind working harder to clarify them if I am not being clear enough. Don't forget I have Autism too, and am doing the best here to communicate with you as I can, in as respectful as manner as possible.

I'll try again, I have a problem with written concise communication. Here are your questions again.

Quote:
Tell me aghogday...how would YOU like to spend the rest of *YOUR* life in a "supported independent living community?


I would like to spend my life, in a supported independent living community that allows the Human freedoms that the Community Choice Act supports.



Quote:
...then when you have done that, try to give me a simple breakdown on how you see it as advantageous to autistics, the government, or even the man in the moon, for autistics to be systematically disenabled and then herded into residential services that not only regularly infringe their fundamental human rights, but also exploit them and profiteer to the extent of billing many times what that service provision actually costs.


I don't like the environments in many of the residential care facilities as they exist today.

The advantage to autistics that need full time care and can not live independently, is it is better than being on the street and starving to death.

The best solution is if they can stay at home with families that care and get the support they need there provided by medicaid, but unfortunately it's not an answer everyone that is permanently disabled with Autism has.

When you provide evidence that anyone is profitting to the extent of billing many times what the service provision actully costs from the medicaid reimbursement that is provided by the government for Autistics in residential care facilities, I will attempt to answer that question, but I can't take it seriously if there is no evidence to support it.



Inventor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,014
Location: New Orleans

08 Aug 2011, 12:00 am

As someone who has been around a long time, I learned of autism through Alex, correcting some of Autism Speaks errors. I was near sixty when I first learned it was not just me.

Without Autism Speaks I would never have learned, I am functioning but odd, and that does not lead to high earnings.

My view of autism was the disabled, I never identified.

Autism Speaks started the public discourse, faults and all they brought the subject up, and explored it.

The first problem was Autism Awareness, it was a standard public relations action, and it worked.

Without awareness nothing could be done, in education, disability, no one knew much.

As far as cure, it is just marketing, at least for those now living. Treatment? I think it would be wasted on me, but should be developed, and become a standard for the young, for I got nothing. Anything seems better than nothing.

Awareness brought up that autism costs billions a year. Almost all funded by families, with some government support. The government does not care why people are disabled, all are treated the same.

To get their attention takes two things, money and social power. Autism was marketed as a disability that might be avoided with more study, private money, and reduce government costs.

If I did not know, Congress knew less. Just making them aware what autism was costing, and the future cost, got their attention.

Government funds studies on why birds fly. They have no idea about Science, and as directed by government, science has no direction. Grants go out by quota to various groups that have political connections and a grant appliction. Some strange things have been studied, that did not advance the body of knowledge.

What I like about the Autism Speaks Machine is it's focus. While it all may be related to autism, it is a tight body of work, ever expanding the edges of knowledge.

This is the grunt work of science, filling in the blanks and not getting a paper published. It is like the Fire Department, going room to room, looking under beds and in closets, and proving there is no one there.

What Autism is not has been well covered.

The focused brainpower is impressive, as is the clarity of their reports. This is not some University trying to convince their Government they are on to something and need another grant.

Autism Speaks research is glad to say where they proved there is nothing to report.

Science is loaded with politics, the Autism Speaks research is free of that.

Before Autism Speaks, there was not an Autistic Community. Without them, no Wrong Planet.

Yes the Autistic have needs, and there is not enough money and magic on earth to supply it. We are also not sure what needs could be met, the order of operation to reach goals, or even what the problems are.

Many of us are in America, lacking the European view of taking care of everyone. There I can see the autistic forming a political party to lobby for more. That will not work here. All disability is underfunded, and it is the same with education, health care, but we do have a War Machine that is the largest of any of the Inner Planets.

To do anything in America, you need a Champion with money and political clout. It is the only way to be heard. You have to develop Brand Identity through Marketing.

In Autism Speaks we have a Corporate Headquarters. Selling Social Entitlements does not work in America. The only thing that sells is long term cost reduction.

Autism Speaks has built a funding machine, does have the support of parents, government, science, and and many autistic people who live in the possible reality. It is the best deal we are going to get in America.

Even ci who is from the Left Coast, the most Euro-Socialist part of America sees that the way to get more services is involve the business community, then sell the idea to government as cost reduction, and some sales tax generated, income. He is not making the wax, does not run the shipping company, and is expanding the economic base.

We have no choice but to join them. It is crooked, but it is the only game in town.

Counting the fringe, autistic but not legally disabled, there are about three million of us. Many not now disabled might be in the future, when family and other support systems disappear. It is in our enlightened self interest to plan for a better future.

Autism Speaks is the only group alined with our long term best interest.

We also have an obligation to show that we wish to be less of a burden, more productive citizens, and do our part to reduce future costs of autism.

Sometimes we do have good ideas that work. They will never be heard unless we have a way to reach a national audience. Workshops and residential farms are ideas the general public can understand, and being self run reduce costs, which they the tax payer bear.

We have to help them help us.

This is America, I have a lot more faith in the goals and ambitions of Autism Speaks than of Republicans or Democrats.



aghogday
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 2010
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,094

08 Aug 2011, 1:03 am

Inventor wrote:
As someone who has been around a long time, I learned of autism through Alex, correcting some of Autism Speaks errors. I was near sixty when I first learned it was not just me.

Without Autism Speaks I would never have learned, I am functioning but odd, and that does not lead to high earnings.

My view of autism was the disabled, I never identified.

Autism Speaks started the public discourse, faults and all they brought the subject up, and explored it.

The first problem was Autism Awareness, it was a standard public relations action, and it worked.

Without awareness nothing could be done, in education, disability, no one knew much.

As far as cure, it is just marketing, at least for those now living. Treatment? I think it would be wasted on me, but should be developed, and become a standard for the young, for I got nothing. Anything seems better than nothing.

Awareness brought up that autism costs billions a year. Almost all funded by families, with some government support. The government does not care why people are disabled, all are treated the same.

To get their attention takes two things, money and social power. Autism was marketed as a disability that might be avoided with more study, private money, and reduce government costs.

If I did not know, Congress knew less. Just making them aware what autism was costing, and the future cost, got their attention.

Government funds studies on why birds fly. They have no idea about Science, and as directed by government, science has no direction. Grants go out by quota to various groups that have political connections and a grant appliction. Some strange things have been studied, that did not advance the body of knowledge.

What I like about the Autism Speaks Machine is it's focus. While it all may be related to autism, it is a tight body of work, ever expanding the edges of knowledge.

This is the grunt work of science, filling in the blanks and not getting a paper published. It is like the Fire Department, going room to room, looking under beds and in closets, and proving there is no one there.

What Autism is not has been well covered.

The focused brainpower is impressive, as is the clarity of their reports. This is not some University trying to convince their Government they are on to something and need another grant.

Autism Speaks research is glad to say where they proved there is nothing to report.

Science is loaded with politics, the Autism Speaks research is free of that.

Before Autism Speaks, there was not an Autistic Community. Without them, no Wrong Planet.

Yes the Autistic have needs, and there is not enough money and magic on earth to supply it. We are also not sure what needs could be met, the order of operation to reach goals, or even what the problems are.

Many of us are in America, lacking the European view of taking care of everyone. There I can see the autistic forming a political party to lobby for more. That will not work here. All disability is underfunded, and it is the same with education, health care, but we do have a War Machine that is the largest of any of the Inner Planets.

To do anything in America, you need a Champion with money and political clout. It is the only way to be heard. You have to develop Brand Identity through Marketing.

In Autism Speaks we have a Corporate Headquarters. Selling Social Entitlements does not work in America. The only thing that sells is long term cost reduction.

Autism Speaks has built a funding machine, does have the support of parents, government, science, and and many autistic people who live in the possible reality. It is the best deal we are going to get in America.

Even ci who is from the Left Coast, the most Euro-Socialist part of America sees that the way to get more services is involve the business community, then sell the idea to government as cost reduction, and some sales tax generated, income. He is not making the wax, does not run the shipping company, and is expanding the economic base.

We have no choice but to join them. It is crooked, but it is the only game in town.

Counting the fringe, autistic but not legally disabled, there are about three million of us. Many not now disabled might be in the future, when family and other support systems disappear. It is in our enlightened self interest to plan for a better future.

Autism Speaks is the only group alined with our long term best interest.

We also have an obligation to show that we wish to be less of a burden, more productive citizens, and do our part to reduce future costs of autism.

Sometimes we do have good ideas that work. They will never be heard unless we have a way to reach a national audience. Workshops and residential farms are ideas the general public can understand, and being self run reduce costs, which they the tax payer bear.

We have to help them help us.

This is America, I have a lot more faith in the goals and ambitions of Autism Speaks than of Republicans or Democrats.


All started by the love of family members, and continued by it. There is no stronger alliance. It is the only real alliance that most people have in the US, particularly those that become disabled.

Thanks, Inventor, I suspected some of this but wasn't here to witness it and understand it as it happened. You present the real world in a real way.

Experience teaches lessons like no other teacher.



ci
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Nov 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,546
Location: Humboldt County, California

08 Aug 2011, 1:09 am

Inventor wrote:
Even ci who is from the Left Coast, the most Euro-Socialist part of America sees that the way to get more services is involve the business community, then sell the idea to government as cost reduction, and some sales tax generated, income. He is not making the wax, does not run the shipping company, and is expanding the economic base.


What I do as far as model is technically not new. Other programs do similar things and have for years. However since I was very young I've wanted to work and have failed, failed gain and seem quite obsessed with working and still yet cannot seem to work independently. However service programs that exist now are so very limiting that I simply had to do better. I believe there is a way of branding hope much like politicians do but in a very specific way that really is not about mainstream politics. I believe the tax-payer ultimately would like cost reduction but supports quality of life programs because they care. I simply think a whole lot more can be done with the same money and as program budgets get cut because of the economy I want to make sure one or a few still exist because my motivation is not government money for my own paycheck but doing things people just don't have the creativity or will to do. I've been in the media (front pages of newspapers), on radio and the program was on T.V news.

It may become shipping but will not ever make wax. The best I do is get corporations to discount their manufactured components to support the program. The other focus is an actual area includes campaign that seeks to simulate real-life work experiences with the support staff in place and in sponsored circumstances so people like myself and of most capabilities can at least experience normal which others take for granted. This may and I hope result in the potential of self-sufficiency and a greater independence.

Quality of life comes first and the politics of selling cost reduction come last. This according to the spirit of California and federal law protecting individual choices. Enhance choices and people become more included and realize a world more accessible to them.


_________________
The peer politics creating intolerance toward compassion is coming to an end. Pity accusations, indifferent advocacy against isolation awareness and for pride in an image of autism is injustice. http://www.autismselfadvocacynetwork.com


Zeraeph
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Aug 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 592

08 Aug 2011, 4:54 am

ci wrote:
Perhaps you do not like to see the obvious in the first video. In context to autism part of the advocacy was about removing the obsticle of isolation that people experience. ASAN obviously was more about a self-centered appeal to self-image and autism the disorder label then the harsh reality others experience in the disability sense. The priorities don't seem to line up with the best interest of others.


Seriously ci, you are reading things into those videos that just are not there. One of my areas of competance is media analysis, and I literally sat and listened to every word of those videos, read all the slogans *AND* even checked out the subliminals and there was nothing, not a trace, to support your claims.

You have a huge vocabulary but a significant communication deficit in how you put it together at times (not always, I checked some of your posts on other subjects and you are often far more fluid, so it may only affect certain topics?)...has it ever occurred to you that might go both ways and create a significant interpretation deficit.?

Of which this is just another example.
ci wrote:
You seem to be still stuck in a them vs. us mentality and attempting to pressure me on your side.


You made up your own mind what I was going to say at some point (possibly as soon as aghogday informed me I was with ASAN, an organisation you seem to have considerable personal issues with, and, incidentally, I am not "with" at all) and have completely failed to take in anything I have said except in terms of confirming that.

You are certainly demonstrating a big problem with interiorised prejudice, whereby you are automatically giving more credence to anyone who is not autistic than to anyone who is...including yourself. You would want to try and overcome that, for just about every reason you could think of.



Zeraeph
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Aug 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 592

08 Aug 2011, 5:05 am

aghogday wrote:
Inventor wrote:

This is America, I have a lot more faith in the goals and ambitions of Autism Speaks than of Republicans or Democrats.


All started by the love of family members, and continued by it. There is no stronger alliance. It is the only real alliance that most people have in the US, particularly those that become disabled.

Thanks, Inventor, I suspected some of this but wasn't here to witness it and understand it as it happened. You present the real world in a real way.


If this is the level of blind naivity this discourse is based upon demanding and expecting of the Autistic community then it is too preposterous for further attention. Few, if any, will ever fall for it.



ci
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Nov 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,546
Location: Humboldt County, California

08 Aug 2011, 11:49 am

ci wrote:
Seriously ci, you are reading things into those videos that just are not there. One of my areas of competance is media analysis, and I literally sat and listened to every word of those videos, read all the slogans *AND* even checked out the subliminals and there was nothing, not a trace, to support your claims.

You have a huge vocabulary but a significant communication deficit in how you put it together at times (not always, I checked some of your posts on other subjects and you are often far more fluid, so it may only affect certain topics?)...has it ever occurred to you that might go both ways and create a significant interpretation deficit.?

Of which this is just another example.


Again what they were protesting against in the news interview had in part to do with isolation advocacy of ASD's. They considered it bigoted and made no motion to then advocate for the isolated but just consider it stereotypical. That is plain as day and others agree with me and have seen the video. This is beyond a duh moment and your attempt to just invent otherwise seems when the awareness was indeed clearly about autism isolation is strange at best.


_________________
The peer politics creating intolerance toward compassion is coming to an end. Pity accusations, indifferent advocacy against isolation awareness and for pride in an image of autism is injustice. http://www.autismselfadvocacynetwork.com


ci
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Nov 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,546
Location: Humboldt County, California

08 Aug 2011, 11:59 am

Zeraeph wrote:
You made up your own mind what I was going to say at some point (possibly as soon as aghogday informed me I was with ASAN, an organisation you seem to have considerable personal issues with, and, incidentally, I am not "with" at all) and have completely failed to take in anything I have said except in terms of confirming that.

You are certainly demonstrating a big problem with interiorised prejudice, whereby you are automatically giving more credence to anyone who is not autistic than to anyone who is...including yourself. You would want to try and overcome that, for just about every reason you could think of.


That happens when people think for themselves and not just those who desire to force views on others or else be called autism bigots.

There we go again. If I think for myself and come to my own conclusion then the master pride movement calls me an autism bigot of some kind. You need to revise the attitude because calling me prejudice simply because I think outside of the pride box is simply a shameful and underhanded tactic of the typical pride agenda to get it's way. While the awareness piece was dramatic and creative I suppose removing the psychiatric label part could have been done but again the important isolation awareness was indeed important.

You sure do have an imagination. Individuals with autism have the human right to be represented to overcome barriers of isolation. Pride won't always like it as when their socialite very high functioning leaders disagree they won't always get their way. That's the nature of disability and people deserve awareness that derives understanding as far as the more profound and severe aspects so it is taken seriously.


_________________
The peer politics creating intolerance toward compassion is coming to an end. Pity accusations, indifferent advocacy against isolation awareness and for pride in an image of autism is injustice. http://www.autismselfadvocacynetwork.com


aghogday
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 2010
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,094

08 Aug 2011, 1:22 pm

Zeraeph Wrote:

Quote:
You made up your own mind what I was going to say at some point (possibly as soon as [b]aghogday informed me I was with ASAN, an organisation you seem to have considerable personal issues with, and, incidentally, I am not "with" at all) and have completely failed to take in anything I have said except in terms of confirming that.


Aghogday Wrote:
@Zeraeph:

I already provided the post link to your statement that you did have a great deal to do with ASAN. Here is the link and the quoted statement that you made. You keep suggesting that others are trying to mislead people to get people to fall for some kind of ploy to support Autism Speaks, but it seems like it is a projection of what you are trying to do here in your quote from the previous thread, if you really are not a part of ASAN.

I could care less if you are, or if you aren't. People here were interested in the viewpoint of ASAN, and I spoke to you about that based on your statement in the previous thread, in a respectful manner.

You didn't deny it then and didn't question my statement, until it suited your purpose to deny it later with CI, suggesting I made it up. I'm fairly sure that anyone that reads the following quoted statement that you made in the linked thread below would come to the same conclusion that everyone else did in that thread, that you were are part of ASAN. If it's not what you meant, although I'm not sure what else it could of meant, all you had to do is clarify it with me when I first brought it up, in my attempt to invite that viewpoint to the forum.

Zeraeph Wrote:
Quote:
Kfisherx...

You say you are a leader in ASAN? How curious that I have never come across you, because I have a very great deal to do with them.


http://www.wrongplanet.net/postxf160091-0-105.html


Aghogday Wrote:
Regarding the puzzle piece icon, it wasn't designed to refer to Autistic people as individuals, but the condition of Autism itself in the mission to understand the pieces of the puzzle needed to come together to understand what causes the impairing symptoms of the disorder. Obviously the puzzle to understand the disorder is getting more complicated as more research is being done. People have taken it personal that consider it an attack on their identity, but that was not the intention of the puzzle icon, or Autism Speaks.

If we did not have any idea what caused Epilepsy, a foundation for Epilepsy might have used the puzzle icon to represent the search to understand the factors that cause Epilepsy, but the causes of the neurological disorder of Epilepsy are fairly well understood so it's not as puzzling what causes Epilepsy, although it is in some cases.

I can't imagine any epileptic individual taking offense to that, and I don't see how it should be any different in the case of Autism, and Autistics. Seizures are a serious impairment and so is the inability to speak, finding out what causes seizures and finding out what causes the inability to speak and correcting both of those impairments are of equal value to those that experience the impairments. It's still a puzzle for what causes some Autistic people the inability to speak.

You asked me several questions, I've done my best to answer them, while you won't respond to any of my questions. That's okay if it is a matter of evidence, I assume you have no evidence to refute the evidence I present.

Here is a personal philosophical question akin to the one you asked me about my personal opinion of how I would like to live my life in a care facility. I responded twice, so let's see if you will respond to this question at least once:

If you had a child that could not speak at the age of three, and the research that Autism Speaks funds, found an intervention that was safe, widely used for years, proven effective, that would ensure that your child would be able to speak would you utilize it or risk communication problems for your child their entire life, because autism speaks funding was behind the research that led to the intervention?


Autism Speaks is still funding research into it that may one day lead some individuals the potential to speak, where there was none before. This would be a breakthrough that might allow thousands of autistic people to live independently with no need of assistance from society. It is a much greater potential gift, than life in a residential care center, no matter how nice it is.



Zeraeph
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Aug 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 592

09 Aug 2011, 4:55 am

1. I have a "great deal to do with" my postman, doesn't mean I am "with" him...his wife might not like that.
2. You have not actually produced any evidence, just asserted that it exists, then produced an odd, barely relevant, commercially biased source and announced it was evidence.
3. I cannot answer your question at all because it is too rhetorical. I have never seen "Autism Speaks" fund or support any research of any kind that is even likely to have an equivalent beneficial effect without a detrimental effect that outweighs it. So it is like asking me if I would join the Klan if they came out in support of same sex, interracial marriage


aghogday wrote:
Autism Speaks is still funding research into it that may one day lead some individuals the potential to speak, where there was none before. This would be a breakthrough that might allow thousands of autistic people to live independently with no need of assistance from society. It is a much greater potential gift, than life in a residential care center, no matter how nice it is.


...and they pay you to hawk this kind of line? 8O



ci
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Nov 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,546
Location: Humboldt County, California

09 Aug 2011, 1:29 pm

This conversation has turned into twisted propaganda based on opinion rather then fact. Frankly I am tired of some radicalism points of view that seem more like an autism form of the tea party then points of view that actually seek individual rights and choices of real people with autism in day to day life. Instead others attempt to push myself and others into an ideological direction or we as people with autism are just one of the "bigots". My suggestion is to change the argument style because most people if they receive an explanation will understand that some are overusing the the "your discriminating" and you are an "autism bigot" to get their way on other political matters.

Under state and federal law all that matters is individual choices. Those t hat seek to enhance individual choices have my respect. Those that just have an agenda and dis-value what is otherwise true discrimination when it takes place by overusing such claims of discrimination do not have my respect. It is clear the above poster does not want fact nor persuasion in any middle moderate consideration.

Those that disagree with certain organizations will never like them until they hand over all power and say to those that disagree. It is no longer about constructive means to achieve quality of life but hardened ideologies. It's not much about happiness or well being it's about pride and pride's propaganda as the central importance and the only way and means to achieve progress to them is with that.

If your going to make claims be prepared to back them up with fact as people are learning to filter out the propaganda and falsities more and more.


_________________
The peer politics creating intolerance toward compassion is coming to an end. Pity accusations, indifferent advocacy against isolation awareness and for pride in an image of autism is injustice. http://www.autismselfadvocacynetwork.com