Website against Asperger's Syndrome: HeartlessAspergers.com

Page 7 of 14 [ 216 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 14  Next

ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 39,637
Location: Long Island, New York

11 Mar 2017, 3:07 pm

Mainstream Australian media article about "Affective deprivation disorder" caused by Aspergers and other conditions.

The empathy gap wrecking relationships

Quote:
Aston first applied the term AfDD to partners with Asperger’s syndrome. After controversy surrounding the precise nature of the condition, she later broadened AfDD’s applicability to include other conditions with low EQ, such as alexithymia, where sufferers can’t identify or express real emotions but, rather, mimic what they see, and then she broadened it further to include disorders such as substance abuse and addictions, where sufferers withdraw. Families of Adults Afflicted with Asperger’s Syndrome favours the term “ongoing traumatic relationship syndrome”.

But experts warn that unless malicious narcissism is present, the aim is not to consider the emotionally challenged partner as being “at fault"


_________________
“Self Acceptance is a process not a performance”
“You are autistic enough. And you always have been”

Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.


League_Girl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 27,317
Location: Pacific Northwest

11 Mar 2017, 3:12 pm

So they are broadening the label. Now they should include anxiety and depression and personality disorders.


_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.

Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.


cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

11 Mar 2017, 5:00 pm

ASPartOfMe wrote:
Mainstream Australian media article about "Affective deprivation disorder" caused by Aspergers and other conditions.

The empathy gap wrecking relationships

Quote:
Aston first applied the term AfDD to partners with Asperger’s syndrome. After controversy surrounding the precise nature of the condition, she later broadened AfDD’s applicability to include other conditions with low EQ, such as alexithymia, where sufferers can’t identify or express real emotions but, rather, mimic what they see, and then she broadened it further to include disorders such as substance abuse and addictions, where sufferers withdraw. Families of Adults Afflicted with Asperger’s Syndrome favours the term “ongoing traumatic relationship syndrome”.

But experts warn that unless malicious narcissism is present, the aim is not to consider the emotionally challenged partner as being “at fault"

BTW you need to enter the title of the article in google as the link to the publication (The Australian Newspaper) is subscription only

So according to the article the wife developed AfDD as a result from the trauma of emotional deprivation experienced by living with her partner - a male adult with low emotional/empathetic quotient (EQ) diagnosed with Asperger’s syndrome.

What's interesting is that it that AfDD is experienced by wives of men with narcissistic personality disorder. It does explain the weirdly distant cold behavior of Melania Trump, obviously a trade off for her gold digging...

As the father of a child with ASD I also wonder if my wife and I have become less empathetic toward others and more withdrawn? we certainly notice our friendship circles have diminished! of course this could all be a coincidence...



Last edited by cyberdad on 11 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.

cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

11 Mar 2017, 5:02 pm

League_Girl wrote:
So they are broadening the label. Now they should include anxiety and depression and personality disorders.

No AfDD is acquired by living with somebody with one of those diagnostic conditions...it's not a extension of the ASD label (according to the article anyway)



Wolfram87
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Feb 2015
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,976
Location: Sweden

12 Mar 2017, 10:48 am

Quote:
the aim is not to consider the emotionally challenged partner as being “at fault"



Right, apart from that literally being the entirety of Astons idea. Also, it's curiously gendered: can NT men get the alleged disorder from being in relationships with aspie women, or would that just be an example of evil, entitled men unreasonably demanding displays of affection from poor, victimized women?


_________________
I'm bored out of my skull, let's play a different game. Let's pay a visit down below and cast the world in flame.


androbot01
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Sep 2014
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,746
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada

12 Mar 2017, 11:33 am

ASPartOfMe wrote:
Quote:
But experts warn that unless malicious narcissism is present, the aim is not to consider the emotionally challenged partner as being “at fault"

Does fault really matter? The end result is that one of the partner's emotional needs are not being met. It may not be intentional or malicious on the autistic person's part, but this doesn't really help the NT.



Wolfram87
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Feb 2015
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,976
Location: Sweden

12 Mar 2017, 11:51 am

If there was any validity to CADD, then fault or no would be a different question.

I'm just pointing out how rich it is to try to emphasize not pointing fingers and casting blame in a news article about the alleged disorder, when the originator of the term hosts a website that is literally nothing but demonizing and casting blame.


_________________
I'm bored out of my skull, let's play a different game. Let's pay a visit down below and cast the world in flame.


Jono
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2008
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,677
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa

13 Mar 2017, 2:55 am

Quote:
But experts warn that unless malicious narcissism is present, the aim is not to consider the emotionally challenged partner as being “at fault"


How does does that even make any sense? If the idea is that AS is the source of this AfDD or whatever, then that is tantamount to the same thing as the AS partner being at fault.



League_Girl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 27,317
Location: Pacific Northwest

13 Mar 2017, 1:36 pm

I wrote a blog post about how I feel about this whole Cassandra thing.

https://mynoneabdlthoughts.wordpress.co ... -bullshit/


_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.

Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.


ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 39,637
Location: Long Island, New York

13 Mar 2017, 3:14 pm

Jono wrote:
Quote:
But experts warn that unless malicious narcissism is present, the aim is not to consider the emotionally challenged partner as being “at fault"


How does does that even make any sense? If the idea is that AS is the source of this AfDD or whatever, then that is tantamount to the same thing as the AS partner being at fault.


The distinction is about intent. Malignant/Malicious narcissism is distinguished from regular narcissism by sadistic and psychopathic behaviors.

It should be noted that neither Malignant Narcissism nor Affective deprivation disorder is in any diagnostic manuals.


_________________
“Self Acceptance is a process not a performance”
“You are autistic enough. And you always have been”

Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.


Jono
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2008
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,677
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa

13 Mar 2017, 5:31 pm

ASPartOfMe wrote:
Jono wrote:
Quote:
But experts warn that unless malicious narcissism is present, the aim is not to consider the emotionally challenged partner as being “at fault"


How does does that even make any sense? If the idea is that AS is the source of this AfDD or whatever, then that is tantamount to the same thing as the AS partner being at fault.


The distinction is about intent. Malignant/Malicious narcissism is distinguished from regular narcissism by sadistic and psychopathic behaviors.

It should be noted that neither Malignant Narcissism nor Affective deprivation disorder is in any diagnostic manuals.


Firstly, intent is actually not relevant whether or not deciding someone is at fault (especially if a relationship is considered abusive, for example). Secondly (and this follows from my first point), saying that the AS partner is not "at fault" because he/she didn't "mean" it does absolutely nothing to address some of the concerns we initially had about the old incarnations of this "disorder" like CADD or the Cassandra Phenomenon. If the old notion of using CADD to deny an AS partner of child custody by using the notion CADD, like what Sheila Jennings Linehan tried to promote, rears it's ugly head again then nobody will give a crap if the AS parent "meant" it or not because the only thing that's considered in such cases is the interests of the child. Finally, it also does absolutely nothing to address the original concerns that this "disorder" can be used to inadvertently support abuse against AS people (if they're unlucky enough to find themselves in an abusive relationship) because it encourages everyone to always believe the NT partner regardless of any evidence to the contrary and CADD can be used as excuse to blame the victim.



ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 39,637
Location: Long Island, New York

14 Mar 2017, 2:34 am

Jono wrote:
ASPartOfMe wrote:
Jono wrote:
Quote:
But experts warn that unless malicious narcissism is present, the aim is not to consider the emotionally challenged partner as being “at fault"


How does does that even make any sense? If the idea is that AS is the source of this AfDD or whatever, then that is tantamount to the same thing as the AS partner being at fault.


The distinction is about intent. Malignant/Malicious narcissism is distinguished from regular narcissism by sadistic and psychopathic behaviors.

It should be noted that neither Malignant Narcissism nor Affective deprivation disorder is in any diagnostic manuals.


Firstly, intent is actually not relevant whether or not deciding someone is at fault (especially if a relationship is considered abusive, for example). Secondly (and this follows from my first point), saying that the AS partner is not "at fault" because he/she didn't "mean" it does absolutely nothing to address some of the concerns we initially had about the old incarnations of this "disorder" like CADD or the Cassandra Phenomenon. If the old notion of using CADD to deny an AS partner of child custody by using the notion CADD, like what Sheila Jennings Linehan tried to promote, rears it's ugly head again then nobody will give a crap if the AS parent "meant" it or not because the only thing that's considered in such cases is the interests of the child. Finally, it also does absolutely nothing to address the original concerns that this "disorder" can be used to inadvertently support abuse against AS people (if they're unlucky enough to find themselves in an abusive relationship) because it encourages everyone to always believe the NT partner regardless of any evidence to the contrary and CADD can be used as excuse to blame the victim.


I thought you were saying in your opinion it did not matter and you were opining that the Aspie should be blamed. I agree Cassandra will be used against aspies no matter what caveats are used, similar to the situation where crime suspects Aspergers diagnosis are always bieng emphasized lately.


_________________
“Self Acceptance is a process not a performance”
“You are autistic enough. And you always have been”

Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.


Amebix
Toucan
Toucan

Joined: 2 Sep 2016
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 267
Location: US

16 Mar 2017, 9:47 pm

I strongly suspect the person who made this site is herself mentally ill. You don't make an entire website attacking a mental disorder if you aren't. Also, I would think that anyone who spent a few months living with me would be generally aware of my shortcomings. This person went through an entire marriage without figuring out what her partner was like. How thick can she be? She also mentions being burned by a friend with Asperger's. I wouldn't be surprised if she randomly diagnosed that friend out of paranoia.

This is a hate site, plain and simple. I would definitely understand if she had made a support site for spouses and family members of autistics. This isn't that - the entire thing is written as a warning, saying people "have the right to know," as if there's something malignant about being autistic.
Our mental disorder is a challenge for us and people we have relationships with. It's worth explaining those challenges and giving support. Her format isn't designed to do that. It's designed to scare people away from us. This format would only be appropriate for mental illnesses that actively victimize people, like sociopathy, sadistic personality disorder, or malignant narcissism. This is completely inappropriate for autism. If you're having trouble removing yourself from the topic, a more comparable mental disorder might be bipolar disorder. I've known way more people who've had their lives undermined through relationships with people with bipolar disorder than autism, though the vast majority of people who are bipolar are wonderful. Two of my closest friends growing up were bipolar. Making a website designed to scare people away from bipolar people would be disgusting and inhumane, just as it is to do so with autism. Make a support site, not a scare site. We don't actively harm people. Our biggest challenge is that we don't always know how people are feeling just by looking at them, and we don't always know how to act. There are ways around this, like verbal communication. It's a challenge. Support can help. But this site is disgusting.

In the website she tries to minimize what she's doing repeatedly, again saying people have "the right to know." If you ask any racist or white supremacist what they're doing, they'll minimize it in a very comparable way. Talk to a Neo-Nazi or KKK member and they'll probably say they're not a supremacist, but rather a "separatist" or a "nationalist." It's BS. I want to know the name of the person who runs this site, she deserves to be held responsible.



norwegiansun
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

Joined: 26 Feb 2017
Gender: Male
Posts: 42
Location: norway

17 Mar 2017, 10:14 am

Amebix: she is not alone. She have a mafia supporting her and her site.



Wolfram87
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Feb 2015
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,976
Location: Sweden

17 Mar 2017, 2:57 pm

Amebix wrote:
It's BS. I want to know the name of the person who runs this site, she deserves to be held responsible.


Maxine Aston


_________________
I'm bored out of my skull, let's play a different game. Let's pay a visit down below and cast the world in flame.


ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 39,637
Location: Long Island, New York

17 Mar 2017, 7:39 pm

Wolfram87 wrote:
Amebix wrote:
It's BS. I want to know the name of the person who runs this site, she deserves to be held responsible.


Maxine Aston


Maxine Aston coined and publicized "Affective Deprivation Disorder". I have seen no evidence iheartless is her site.


_________________
“Self Acceptance is a process not a performance”
“You are autistic enough. And you always have been”

Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.