glarbl_blarbl wrote:
Coincidentally, today I was looking at the list of historical figures suspected to have been autistic on wikipedia (don't feel like linking to it), and I found speculation that more than a few of the worst of the worst have been speculated to have been on the spectrum. People like Hiter, Dahmer, etc.
I felt pretty damned offended at the time. But then I thought, what if it's true? What does it mean? To me it suggests that people on the spectrum may be just as vulnerable to sociopathy as NTs. A small percentage of us may well have damaged ethical judgment. And like most people on the spectrum, if one's special interest is a horrific abomination like Hitler's obsession with genocide then given enough amphetamine and charisma they can nearly bring their plans to pass.
For me, I have a clear memory of an aha moment when empathy was made clear for me. I don't think I was especially mean before that, but after that moment I was much more conscious of other people's feelings -- even if I did have a hard time reading the body language. I have a powerful imagination so I would just imagine myself as them. I guess it's a little less efficient than the NT intuitive method, but oh well.
Bit of a push drawing comparison between genocide and cannibalism and "looking fir UFOs" or "stealing money" dont you think?
As a side point, Hitler seems to have spent more time and thought on redesigning Berlin than he ever did on the day to day running of the holocaust. Most holocaust related orders are simply vague suggestions that the "problem" should be "fixed" and similar disseminations, but he moved Albert Speer into the office next door just so they could discuss architechtural plans more easily. IF he was AS, and IF he had a "special interest", it doesnt appear to have been "genocide".
_________________
"There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart,
that you can't take part" [Mario Savo, 1964]