Behaviour on this forum

Post Reply New Topic

The general behaviour has not improved on this forum despite repeated warnings. The moderators patience is now at an end. This means it is time to put into effect the threat of banning those members who continue to indulge in personal attacks and trollish behaviour.

The banhammer is poised and ready. You have all been warned.

THANK HEAVENS...

It was becoming impossible to actually discuss any thread topic appropriately here at all.

Thank you!

I find that being made out to having insulted another when it was just a sensitive topic for instance is unreasonable when I was not even the one who brought it up originally. It was brought forth in a reply in a very mature way but originally another for instance did so under a political premise. Having a moderator say I am not credible is also redicilious. The admins where applicable are involved in self-advocacy as well. These are personal attacks from a moderator effectively breaking the rules. The issues however are sensitive so I can understand the feelings of the need to backlash a bit but setting an example is important. I propose that sensitive issues be allowed to be brought up and for others to participate with maturity or allow it to degrade then be punished.

W.P is a political organization with advocacy against mainstream autism advocacy in origin such as autism is a jail sentence (isolation advocacy). Since then they receive compensation from Autism Speaks and I understand their is some unease with that situation by some who help lead. My proposal is that madorators do not take sides on issues and conduct personal attacks just the same as they would not like others to do to each-other. I think this compromise is fair.

I will be speaking to Alex so to make sure this results in some fairness.

Why is it that one never hears the words "It's not fair!" from someone who is justifiably in the right?

Hardened beliefs which are rightful to individuals will not concern the legitimate concerns of others not about those specific concerns. If there are rules they ought to be followed not just when it's convienant. That applies to everyone but I myself would never want to run a forum dealing with these social messes. It's a tough job.

Ci, in the kindest possible way, if you try to turn this thread into yet another bunfight, you are almost certain to be banned as soon as a mod sees it, and you are not daft, you know that for yourself really...

So for your own sake, cool it, please?

I have no interest in discussing this matter with other members directly anymore but with the organizations founder. I'd like to see individuals whom are isolated advocated for by the organizations that do not like advocacy about isolation. I think it would help people. I'm not interested in appeasing what seems to be violations of the rules by most with concern to these alike discussion. If I was take the rules literally most are guilty and I don't want to discuss this further in this topic.

I am interested in protecting others from peer pressure politics and biased issues with a fairness of portrayal in substitute by applicable organizations for at risk individuals. It is no longer about this behavior topic.

Well, it does seem to be all about you, now.

Issues do not conflict; people do.

I already have and this is the correct forum but not perhaps the right topic.