Behaviour on this forum

Post Reply New Topic

I believe the reply was out of line. I don't receive behavioral supports as I've discussed because of mental health but rather sensory integration and skills. I think you are clearly breaking the rules in your reply and it's down right demeaning Moog not just toward myself but others with behavioral disabilities as defined by autism criterion. Though I appreciate you might be misunderstanding my approach I figure my perspective might not be in line with the political aspirations as defined originally by W.P as it conducted itself. I realized this but I think the public ought to be educated with regards to the differences in advocacy-by individuals with different diagnoses one being Asperger's and the other the original autism category. I'm not the only one who thinks this but we are usually keeping it to ourselves in the midst of political groups having online forums like this and speak in private. I only ask that you follow the rules as well.

Moderators should not take sides but see the rules narrowly as it applies to everyone.

The problem Z is hostilities are abound. Hostilities are rewarded even. Rules do not apply to those most in favor of popular appeal toward peers. If the rules apply more to some then others then how can those it applies more to actually make their case? This is not all my fault. If the rules were really followed we'd see only those who do not follow them as obviously standing out but it seems as this is politics that's just part of the behavior.

I will make some more posts with a very refined method of reproach and seeking certain participation styles. However it is unlikely people will participate. People thrive on emotions and these issues.

Many of these issues already are about people being insulted, offended and a long history already exists with that outside of my interaction and participation with it. I'm not at fualt for issues that conflict with one another. My goal has been to show the rationale behind the historical conflict on a personable level right here in the now. Covering sensitive topics is not against the rules. For doing so others have attacked me in very unrelated matters on this forum. I can say now that an intention may be so unpopular due to hard held beliefs that is seems unreasonable to some but the rules have been broken abound. Don't blame the people who are not going along with the peer pressure politics when other break the rules so very openly.

It may not be a popular business strategy for W.P to cater to all views. If that's the case state it.

I welcome you to oversee the next few topics.

Ci, here's a good idea for a thread that would be likely to get a positive response:

"How can I be a better autism advocate?: AKA raising awareness without raising blood pressure"

I think it would be useful all round.

If that means excluding the reality of others in the disability they experience for social peer pressure we have a problem. Not just ethical but that of moral and inciting civil rights violations against the most vulnerable. I am approaching this matter like others with the big picture approach.

Let's see how it goes Mr. Moog.

The point is everyone has the responsibility to act accordingly to the rules. Issues in of themselves if brought forth on this forum because of their nature would violate the rules. Bringing them up because of how personal they are would violate the rules. However the compromise is when issues are made personal toward individual members and person to person unrelated insults come about that should be a violation of the rules for sure. If one chooses to be insulted over the idea of a cure and it is taken personally as an insult and put down that's a violation of the rules. The same is true when others call wanting a cure pity of any sort of context as this has been the peer pressure put down tolerated for years calling others curebee and other indirects toward the self-esteem for wanting a cure. These politics do not comply with the "rules".

I just don't understand how I and others can follow the rules always. I want you to see a few subject for yourself and see it's evolution. I think this is only reasonable.