Video to show anyone who believes the vaccine 'science'
Show this to anyone who believes vaccines cause autism
http://siz.io/s/epic-win/v/penn-and-tel ... ons?srctum
lostonearth35
Veteran
Joined: 5 Jan 2010
Age: 52
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,880
Location: On a planet where I don't belong.
Well I am most definitely not a "bible-thumper", and where is the science in the Penn and teller vid (I didnt click the link but assume it is the one I've seen before where they dance around and take the p out of it?)
Do you not agree that there might be a reason why they wouldn't want people to know if there WAS truth to it. That they wouldn't throw money at trying to put down anyone who preached that immunisation is bad, when it has been an amazing success for humanity?
I think in general immunisation is a good thing, but that mercury and other heavy metals, and some other preservatives, are way too dangerous to be injecting into people. We have no idea of the effect this has on future generations grown in women who had them, yet we are all herded in, or ridiculed if we don't agree that is best for everyone to have them. It should all be taken on a case-by-case basis, and we should feel like we have a choice. The government does not own us, whether they think they do or not. We have as much of a responsibility to investigate and challenge what they tell us as we do to have the jabs for the good of the general population.
I am (tested/diagnosed) with a lot of heavy metal allergies, yet I have been given the MMR and hundreds of other vaccines and medications which contain ridiculous things unnecessarily. It is impossible for our body to process these substances because we haven't evolved needing to. It is very basic biology to know that we use our gut to filter out toxins like these so they DON'T get into our bloodstream. What I want is that the drugs companies are forced to take a teeeeeennny bit of their ridiculous profit, and look into how they effect people differently, the amount of these it is advantageous to give, other ways of creating their medicines (especially the ones given 'automatically' at the moment) and to have a fair way for people to be compensated IF they are proven, as far as the evidence shows, to be harmed by the drugs.
At the moment people can only take these cases to specially set-up secret courts, and this is a gross deviation to how our justice system is supposed to work. You only have to look for 5 mins at the way thalidomide victims were treated (in the uk especially) to see that there is a problem with how drugs companies get special treatment by law, and how even admitted victims of their negligence get no quick resolve, sometimes spending their whole lives trying to get their worries heard/investigated at least.
_________________
Female, UK. Self diagnosed. Waiting for the NHS.
Apologies for long posts... I cant help it!
Well I am most definitely not a "bible-thumper", and where is the science in the Penn and teller vid (I didnt click the link but assume it is the one I've seen before where they dance around and take the p out of it?)
Do you not agree that there might be a reason why they wouldn't want people to know if there WAS truth to it. That they wouldn't throw money at trying to put down anyone who preached that immunisation is bad, when it has been an amazing success for humanity?
I think in general immunisation is a good thing, but that mercury and other heavy metals, and some other preservatives, are way too dangerous to be injecting into people. We have no idea of the effect this has on future generations grown in women who had them, yet we are all herded in, or ridiculed if we don't agree that is best for everyone to have them. It should all be taken on a case-by-case basis, and we should feel like we have a choice. The government does not own us, whether they think they do or not. We have as much of a responsibility to investigate and challenge what they tell us as we do to have the jabs for the good of the general population.
I am (tested/diagnosed) with a lot of heavy metal allergies, yet I have been given the MMR and hundreds of other vaccines and medications which contain ridiculous things unnecessarily. It is impossible for our body to process these substances because we haven't evolved needing to. It is very basic biology to know that we use our gut to filter out toxins like these so they DON'T get into our bloodstream. What I want is that the drugs companies are forced to take a teeeeeennny bit of their ridiculous profit, and look into how they effect people differently, the amount of these it is advantageous to give, other ways of creating their medicines (especially the ones given 'automatically' at the moment) and to have a fair way for people to be compensated IF they are proven, as far as the evidence shows, to be harmed by the drugs.
At the moment people can only take these cases to specially set-up secret courts, and this is a gross deviation to how our justice system is supposed to work. You only have to look for 5 mins at the way thalidomide victims were treated (in the uk especially) to see that there is a problem with how drugs companies get special treatment by law, and how even admitted victims of their negligence get no quick resolve, sometimes spending their whole lives trying to get their worries heard/investigated at least.
A few things about the mercury (thimerosal) in vaccines. Thimerosal contains ethyl mercury, which is rapidly eliminated from the body through waste. Thus it does not raise blood mercury above safe levels for infants. Thimerosal in infants study link
Second thing, numerous studies have actually proven that there is no link between vaccines and autism. A large international study was just completed that confirmed yet again that there is no link.
Recent autism and vaccines study link
Thirdly, much of thimerosal was removed from vaccines in late 1990s-2001 because of concerns about mercury. Autism rates are still rising. Vaccinations do not explain that.
Thimerosal removed from childhood vaccines link
Fourth, there are some people (a category in which you probably would have fit in had your heavy metal allergies been known at the time of immunisation), who cannot be vaccinated because they are immunocompromised or too young to have received all the recommended vaccinations. For them, the herd immunity of people who are capable of receiving vaccinations is their only defense against the diseases for which we have vaccines. They can't catch something if there is nothing there for them to catch.
Fifth, as for the cases of brain damage resulting from adverse reactions to vaccinations that resemble autism due to heavy metal allergies, they are rare and thus the benefits far outweigh the risks. Besides, personally, I'd rather have a brain-damaged child than a dead one.
Finally, the full Penn and Teller video (which can be found on youtube) does go through a list of the ingredients in the MMR vaccine and explains the purpose of all the "questionable" ingredients. It turns out that they are not harmful given the small amounts present in vaccines and do need to be in the vaccinations for them to be effective.
_________________
Diagnosed Asperger's - 2007
Current AQ score: 43
Current PDD score: 105 - moderate
http://www.childbrain.com/pddassess.html
-Socially awkward and special interests don't mean autism.-
my replies in bold...
A few things about the mercury (thimerosal) in vaccines. Thimerosal contains ethyl mercury, which is rapidly eliminated from the body through waste. Thus it does not raise blood mercury above safe levels for infants. Thimerosal in infants study link
Second thing, numerous studies have actually proven that there is no link between vaccines and autism. A large international study was just completed that confirmed yet again that there is no link.
Recent autism and vaccines study link
They are probably quite safe in general, and worth encouraging, but any large study has been funded by someone with a vested interest in some way- and the person who writes the results of a study is often doing the job of a spin doctor. I could probably take the bare results, all of the details, and make it look like almost everyone is affected by them in some awful way. The governments vested interest is an overwhelming one- to ensure the safety of the majority of people. They think they have to keep people in the dark to do this when the majority would still get the jab if they knew the real risks, but all it does is breed distrust in them
Thirdly, much of thimerosal was removed from vaccines in late 1990s-2001 because of concerns about mercury. Autism rates are still rising. Vaccinations do not explain that.
Thimerosal removed from childhood vaccines link
Yes, they removed it because of the media coverage, but god knows what else is in there. There are other theories about what was causing the autism-like symptoms, viruses from the way they are created for example. Nobody who would want to disclose the information is allowed access to all of it before it is edited in some way.
Fourth, there are some people (a category in which you probably would have fit in had your heavy metal allergies been known at the time of immunisation), who cannot be vaccinated because they are immunocompromised or too young to have received all the recommended vaccinations. For them, the herd immunity of people who are capable of receiving vaccinations is their only defense against the diseases for which we have vaccines. They can't catch something if there is nothing there for them to catch.
I totally agree that immunocompromised kids are given extra protection from the herd, but that theory is debunked by the fact that they were ALL vaccinated with this stuff, believing it to be safe, and their immune system is further compromised, and people who have this valid concern are being FORCED to by the government in America to get their kid injected. We are being thrown false information to keep the masses quiet and we are not all as stupid as they think, or as paranoid! I was a very Atopic child by the age of 2, with asthma, hay fever and extremely severe eczema for which i had been hospitalised. I was already recognised as being allergic to penicillin and having bad reactions to other medications.
Are you trying to tell me they couldn't publish that kids with my problems should not be immunised? Or at least give us the information so we could decide? When I was at school we were just told "you get your jab on this day" and that it was perfectly safe and for the good of everyone. The drugs companies knew the risks to people like me (if not, then we should worry about the validity of their safety studies anyway). The nurses came to school to give me injection after injection, without even thinking about what was in it, and it took some very brave people to bring their concerns to the attention of the media so that people even have a choice to look into it these days. None of those campaigners have disputed that the basic idea of immunisation is a bad thing, just that the drugs companies should have to disclose their methods and ingredients so people can make an informed decision, and they are disgusted with the way their valid claims were dealt with when they presented their case.
Fifth, as for the cases of brain damage resulting from adverse reactions to vaccinations that resemble autism due to heavy metal allergies, they are rare and thus the benefits far outweigh the risks. Besides, personally, I'd rather have a brain-damaged child than a dead one.
Well, i dont know (I haven't gone through my records so there may be an obvious correlation like in some other cases) if there is a link between my vaccine dates and increasing allergies etc, but i am going to argue, for the sake of argument, that I was affected by it and it made my allergies, gut and skin problems worse. I have been so low at points that I tried to kill myself twice. Not for attention (I didn't tell anyone) and the ONLY reason I didn't follow through at that time was because of what it would've done to my family. I would never, ever consider it again because i can see life from the other side. To recover, I had to take immuno-suppressants so now have a greater risk of liver and kidney problems.
So my mum could've brought me up constantly worrying, putting cream on me etc, then she would've had a dead child anyway because my immunal problems compounded my belief that it would be easier if I wasn't here at all. Do you really think I should have to suffer my whole life because they can't be bothered to take the scrutiny of what's in their drugs? It's about money, (why not at least allergy test the kids first?) and their obsession with saving money caused my problems while Gary F**king Barlow is legally allowed to avoid his tax in this country. There was actually a risk of me dying on the spot if I had anaphylaxis straight away, and it has happened to people who fit the "at risk" category but were injected anyway. I would rather have taken my chances with measles, mumps etc to be honest. And flu (and some other things babies are now vaccinated for) is something most people dont die from so it is an unnessasary injection. I was more than fine with chicken pox- in fact, I didn't really care at all, because I was used to being itchy and flu-like. The viruses will always keep up with the vaccines anyway- they are cleverer than us.
Finally, the full Penn and Teller video (which can be found on youtube) does go through a list of the ingredients in the MMR vaccine and explains the purpose of all the "questionable" ingredients. It turns out that they are not harmful given the small amounts present in vaccines and do need to be in the vaccinations for them to be effective.
It is hardly aimed at being scientifically informative though, is it? More towards getting a reaction and making the people who have concerns even more afraid of speaking out for what they believe in. All it does is encourage ridicule.
_________________
Female, UK. Self diagnosed. Waiting for the NHS.
Apologies for long posts... I cant help it!
Ps. I don't know how you can say that these children's problems "resembled" autism. Autism is a neurological disorder, and apart from brain scans the only way we can diagnose it is through the traits/characteristics and symptoms. We dont actually know what causes it, just the EFFECTS if it. If you have found any other way to tell, please let the world know how to tell if it is REAL autism. Give me your life story/family/neonatal history in full and I could tell you how you just resemble an autistic person.
_________________
Female, UK. Self diagnosed. Waiting for the NHS.
Apologies for long posts... I cant help it!
Some children who have confirmed brain damage show symptoms that appear to be very autistic. However, due to the knowledge that they are brain-damaged, an autism diagnosis is ruled out because their specific brain damage already explains the behaviours. There may also be children who are diagnosed with brain damage and autistic tendencies because it is uncertain whether the behaviours are from the brain damage or because of possible autism as well.
I think you may be interested in reading "ret*d Isn't Stupid, Mom" by Sandra Kaufman. Her daughter Nicole was born with brain damage and displayed a fair amount of autistic symptoms but her existing diagnoses of mental retardation and brain-damage were sufficient cause for the behaviours and so she never received an autism diagnosis.
---
As for my life story, here is a condensed medical version.
Ages 8 months to 18 months, prescribed Reglan for choking problem while sleeping. Slept semi-upright in car seat to reduce choking.
Age ~2 years, diagnosed with nonspecific developmental delays (speech and walking)
Ages 2-3.5 years, speech and occupational therapy.
Age 3.5 years, evaluation states at chronological age of 3.5, I was functioning at the level of a 2.5 year old.
Ages 3-5, caught up to milestones with therapies. Attended mainstream preschool and readiness kindergarten (pre-kindergarten).
Ages 5-7, mainstream school up to 2nd grade . No further evaluations.
Age 8, tested for ADD/ADHD. Negative.
Ages 9-12, mainstream school through 7th grade.
Age 13, evaluated for inconsistent academic productivity and limited peer interaction. Diagnosed with depression. Referred to behavioural therapist for further evaluation.
Age 14, evaluation by behavioural therapist continued. Diagnosed with Asperger's Syndrome.
Ages 13-18, cognitive behaviour therapy to improve social communication and understanding, and to develop realistic post-high school goals.
_________________
Diagnosed Asperger's - 2007
Current AQ score: 43
Current PDD score: 105 - moderate
http://www.childbrain.com/pddassess.html
-Socially awkward and special interests don't mean autism.-

