UK's largest sperm bank caught trying to practice eugenics

Post Reply New Topic

Largest UK sperm bank turns away dyslexic donors - The Guardian

Christ they're labeling us as a "neurological disease" now. Why was I stupid enough to go after a official diagnosis.

While not America and Germany the UK has a shameful eugenics history of its own
The eugenics movement Britain wants to forget - New Statesman

From a discussion on Reddit:

Here's how this works:
1. Women have the right to be aware of who they're reproducing with.
2. Sperm banks must ask for info about the man in order to provide the info to the woman so she can be informed.
3. Sperm banks cost money to operate.
4. In order to maximize efficiency, sperm banks must choose which sperm to keep.
5. It's not efficient to keep autistic sperm when they know nobody will use it if they are informed about it.
6. No man (or person but we're talking about sperm, so man) is entitled to have children with somebody else. So if nobody wants their sperm, it may not be "fair", but they do not get to force people to take their sperm.

I think calling that eugenics is almost lobbying against a woman's right to choose who they reproduce with...which is gross.

I don't have a problem with the sperm bank exclusion criteria. I reproduced with a likely HFA or AS mate, but I didn't know it because he passed well and those were not spoken of at the time. As a result, two AS children. (Yes, some of it came from my side as well.) Honest to gosh, I chose that mate in part because he seemed pretty normal and I hoped that would wash out some of my weird.

Is choosing a mate because you think he would produce healthy and attractive children, as well as help raise them, any different than excluding genetic anomalies at a sperm bank? Yet I think most people do attempt to do the former, to the extent they have a choice in the matter.

I wonder if they screen the women they're giving the sperm to as well. Makes a nice double standard if they don't.

I doubt that they do - the women (or the doctors of the women) are their customers.

They screen for genetic health in order to market their product to the customers. The point is to have a "quality product," not to produce perfect offspring. It's a business.

Get a grip. It's a sperm bank. If we want to have children, we should find ourselves a partner and have them ourselves. You wouldn't want to be responsible for bringing a child with special needs into the world and put them into the hands of parents who don't have what it takes to take care of them, would you? Rather let them have parents that can bring them up properly.

If I could choose whether my child had it or not, I would choose without. There is a pattern of hereditary autism/asperger's, although no gene has been identified. So it would surely make sense that those with and ASD don't donate sperm to women who don't want to run the risk.

All you people yelling pro choice unless I am missing something the letter went out to donors not clients.

Sperm banks inherently practice eugenics, the whole point is to be discriminatory so you can "create" the best kid of your choosing. Once they can genetically screen autism, they will start eliminating the "problem".