Campin_Cat wrote:
She IS responding to your OP----and, you DID say the idea; you said:
"Part of the neurodiversity paradigm is eliminating or **replacing** deficits-based language. Well, the term "autism" itself is an example of deficits-based language."
Yes, I said part of the
neurodiversity paradigm is replacing certain terms. I didn't say anything about
my wanting to replace any terms, so there's no justification for asking me what
I want to replace "autism" with.
Quote:
Just because she didn't answer your questions / respond the way you wanted----and, asked her OWN questions----doesn't mean she wasn't paying attention (if that's what you meant);
No. Not what I said. Same issue as previous poster: respond to what's on the screen, not meanings and motivations you make up and project onto me.
Quote:
and, I think she has very valid questions.
I don't know what you mean by "valid," but I fail to see the
relevance in asking me whether I advocate an end to autism diagnoses. That has
nothing whatsoever to do with anything in the OP.