barf wrote:
Definitely not a hero, but a few suggestions that I hope might help:
- Think in 3rd person (without catastrophising and assuming the worst). Imagine yourself being in the recipients position, and having to read your letter.
- Avoid making strong assertions, unless they are about empirical facts. Ie; avoid asserting something as fact, which could be subject to differences in opinion in another person. Qualify opinions as exactly that: opinion.
- Use argumentum ad verecundiam (appeal to authority). It's actually a fallacy of logic when it comes to debate, but humbling yourself in the face of authority with the power to decide over you, may help exhibit an understanding of the situation you're in.
Reading through the wikipedia list of logical fallacies may also help allude you to errors that can be made when trying to persuade. Also, I can recommend any books on the subject by Noam Chomsky, or Edwards Bernays such as 'Crystalising Public Opinion' and 'Propaganda'.
Thank you very much. I have taken in your advice and I will look up those lists and books.
_________________
I've left WP.