Autistic man fighting to regain right to vote, buy home

Page 1 of 1 [ 6 posts ] 

ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 39,637
Location: Long Island, New York

27 Aug 2020, 3:55 pm

A man with autism lost his right to vote or buy a home. He’s fighting to reclaim them - Miami Herald

Quote:
At 22, Tyler Borjas had a job, a bank account and got around using Uber and Metrorail.

But he couldn’t legally vote, buy a house or make travel plans. That’s because a Miami-Dade court deemed Borjas, who has autism, “incapacitated,” and placed him under guardianship.

”I want to make my own decisions,” Borjas, who is now 25, said. “I want my rights back.”

Guardianship essentially stripped Borjas of his rights, meaning he couldn’t legally make decisions for himself, said Viviana Bonilla López, an attorney working with Disability Rights Florida, an advocacy group.

Bonilla López has set out to change that for Borjas and other adults by promoting a mechanism known as Supported Decision Making instead of guardianship. If Borjas succeeds, it’s believed he’ll be only the second person in the state to reclaim his rights back in this manner.

Supported Decision Making allows adults with disabilities a “less restrictive alternative” while ensuring that they have oversight and help in making important decisions. Bonilla López filed a “suggestion of capacity,” (similar to a motion) in court on Thursday asking a judge to give Borjas his rights back and name his mother, Kelly Bain-Borjas, and two sisters, Hayley and Jade, as his supporters.

“Supported Decision Making better enables people with disabilities to protect themselves from abuse and neglect,” Bonilla López said. “Guardians and guardian advocates have sole control over the person in their care’s life with little oversight.”

So if Borjas wants to go on a trip or buy a car he would run the idea by his supporters and together they would make a decision. Borjas would be able to play a more active role in controlling his own life.

TYLER AS A CHILD
Borjas was a toddler when his mother started to notice her son wasn’t hitting certain milestones, including talking. Her brother told her not to worry, because boys tend to develop a little slower.

She ended up taking him to a neurologist and learned her son had autism.

She enrolled him in a Miami preschool that offered a program for children with autism. He was placed in an ESE class in elementary school and “he excelled,” his mom said.

Bain-Borjas said she didn’t want to hold her son back from doing anything he wanted to do. He wanted to learn martial arts. She obliged. He wanted to volunteer. So she signed him up. He wanted to work. She helped him get a job.

At 16, Borjas was already learning the importance of helping others and working. His first volunteer job was at a bird sanctuary. While in high school, Borjas was placed in a job-training program at the University of Central Florida, where he got experience by working at places including Publix and an assisted living facility.

“One thing about Tyler, is he is very self-motivated,” she said.

[b]A LIFE FOR HIMSELF
[/b]
Borjas completed an internship at Nicklaus Children’s Hospital, and in 2016 he got a job at AmericanAirlines Arena working in the Papa John’s. He is currently not working because the pandemic has shut down major events.

Borjas does it all. He uses the dough machine, makes the pizza and delivers throughout the arena.

He was living at home, but building the life he wanted.

HOW THEY FELL UNDER GUARDIANSHIP
When Borjas was 22, his mother filed a personal injury lawsuit on her son’s behalf. She said a lawyer told her the only option was guardianship.

She had heard about guardianship while her son was in school, but never went that route because she didn’t think her son needed it.

She said before she knew it, the judge deemed Tyler incapacitated.

“I was thrown off,” she said. “I didn’t want to take his rights away. I was very distraught.”

WHAT LED THEM TO SUPPORTED DECISION MAKING
Bonilla López is an Equal Justice Works Fellow working with Disability Rights Florida.

Her project, which is sponsored by the Florida Bar Foundation, is focused on expanding the use of Supported Decision Making.

She said she met Tyler and his mom at an event in October where she presented on the topic.

That’s when Bonilla López decided to take on Tyler’s cause.

“Tyler’s case is a perfect example that a guardianship should never have happened,” she said. “He was already independent and he was being found incapacitated.”

THE FIRST FLORIDA CASE
Michael Lincoln-McCreight became the first person in Florida to terminate his guardianship in favor of Supported Decision Making.

In 2014, Lincoln-McCreight, who has a developmental disability and was in foster care, was deemed incapacitated after an advisor decided guardianship was the best route for him.

Now 25, he was around 20 at the time and participated in the Sheriff’s Explorers, volunteered at hospitals, went to church, and loved movies.

But that didn’t matter. In September 2014, the Circuit Court of St. Lucie County declared Michael incapacitated and he lost his rights.

“My dad always taught me to be independent,” he said. “I was shocked that it happened.”

Working with Disability Rights Florida, Lincoln-McCreight, who is a security guard, got his rights back in 2016.

He now works to help others like Tyler.

“People with disabilities can do anything if they set to their mind to it,” he said.

ON A MISSION
Bonilla López’s main goal is to spread the word that Supportive Decision Making should be used as an alternative to guardianship when it is appropriate.

“Guardianships are overused when really the person could be making their own decision with support,” she said. “A lot of times people confuse needing help with not being able to do something. But all of us need help, all of us need advice and people with disabilities are no different.

Bonilla López said they are also working on legislation that would require Supportive Decision Making to be considered before a disability guardianship is activated.

For Tyler, getting his rights back would mean he is in control.

For his mom: “I am just so happy that there is something in place that can help Tyler.”


_________________
“Self Acceptance is a process not a performance”
“You are autistic enough. And you always have been”

Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.


League_Girl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 27,317
Location: Pacific Northwest

27 Aug 2020, 4:10 pm

Quote:
When Borjas was 22, his mother filed a personal injury lawsuit on her son’s behalf. She said a lawyer told her the only option was guardianship.


How did this even happen and why would she file a lawsuit for a personal injury? Did her son hurt her in some way?

Was this the only option to keep her son out of legal trouble by if she became his guardian.

This is very strange.


_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.

Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.


adoylelb90815
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 1 Sep 2015
Age: 50
Posts: 445
Location: California

08 Sep 2020, 11:49 am

I'm guessing the personal injury lawsuit was because the man probably didn't have the money to get his own attorney to file, so his mom helped thinking it wouldn't lead to her son's rights being taken away. It sounds like the personal injury lawsuit itself is still sealed by the courts, so nobody knows the details about that case.



blazingstar
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Nov 2017
Age: 72
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,234

08 Sep 2020, 1:51 pm

The mother just got bad advice. Even if he needed help with filing a civil suit, guardianship can be limited to just "sue and defend." There is also "guardian advocate" in which a guardian is appointed, but the "ward" is not adjudicated incapacitated.

Guardianship law in Florida is not well understood by most lawyers. And mostly it is used for very elderly people with dementia, not for people with autism or ID.

There are 12 "rights" of Florida citizens and each one must be adjudicated separately. Guardianship is supposed to be re-evaluated every year and the judge has to renew the letters of guardianship each year. At any point, if someone believes the ward does not need guardianship in one or more areas, rights are supposed to be restored.

Now, that rarely happens.

I personally don't like the idea of guardianship by committee as described in this supported decision making. I have seen too many shared guardians chew each other up over decisions and never arrive at anything in the best interests of the ward.


_________________
The river is the melody
And sky is the refrain
- Gordon Lightfoot


SeattleCrochetWoman
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

Joined: 5 Mar 2016
Gender: Female
Posts: 4
Location: USA

10 Sep 2020, 8:57 pm

League_Girl wrote:
Quote:
When Borjas was 22, his mother filed a personal injury lawsuit on her son’s behalf. She said a lawyer told her the only option was guardianship.


How did this even happen and why would she file a lawsuit for a personal injury? Did her son hurt her in some way?

Was this the only option to keep her son out of legal trouble by if she became his guardian.

This is very strange.


No, she filed the lawsuit on his behalf, which means he must've been injured in some way but didn't feel up to bringing suit, for whatever reason.



KazBrekker
Butterfly
Butterfly

Joined: 26 Sep 2020
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 12

27 Sep 2020, 5:23 pm

blazingstar wrote:
The mother just got bad advice. Even if he needed help with filing a civil suit, guardianship can be limited to just "sue and defend." There is also "guardian advocate" in which a guardian is appointed, but the "ward" is not adjudicated incapacitated.

Guardianship law in Florida is not well understood by most lawyers. And mostly it is used for very elderly people with dementia, not for people with autism or ID.

There are 12 "rights" of Florida citizens and each one must be adjudicated separately. Guardianship is supposed to be re-evaluated every year and the judge has to renew the letters of guardianship each year. At any point, if someone believes the ward does not need guardianship in one or more areas, rights are supposed to be restored.

Now, that rarely happens.

I personally don't like the idea of guardianship by committee as described in this supported decision making. I have seen too many shared guardians chew each other up over decisions and never arrive at anything in the best interests of the ward.


I've lived much of my life in FL and after having been through the state's school system this is one of my biggest concerns: facing an authority figure who doesn't understand autism/HFA and decides to deprive you of certain rights and freedoms because they see your diagnosis and assume you're much more limited in your abilities than you actually are.