I am wanting to prepare a calm, thoughtful case against Autism Speaks that I can present to anyone I talk to who supports Autism Speaks. I am wondering if people here can help me find solid evidence for the points I want to make. I want to be able to back up my claims with evidence as much as possible; I do not want to link to angry opponents of Autism Speaks, no matter how right they may be, because I think that will make people who so far support Autism Speaks get defensive/oppositional themselves. I would rather understate my case and have every point be backed up with indisputable evidence than overstate it and have people think I'm reading too much into things and sensationalizing.
1. Money problems? I've heard it said that Autism Speaks doesn't manage its money well; what is the evidence for that? I did find the Better Business Bureau report that states that Autism Speaks does not meet all its guidelines ( ), but the only guideline it misses is related to it not disclosing how an affinity credit card program, and I suspect that many people will not consider that a sufficient financial problem.
2. Eugenics. What are the most incriminating things that Autism Speaks and its representatives have said and done in this regard? I suspect that they have never overtly said that they support eugenics or abortion of autistic fetuses; if they have, that is important information. Have they overtly said that they are looking for a prenatal test? Or is it more at the level of "They are putting most of their research efforts into figuring out the genetics of autism; combined with an emphasis on early diagnosis, this logically leads to a desire for a prenatal test"?
3. Types of research funded. One statistic I think I've heard is that only 4% of the money they spend on programs goes towards actually helping autistic people/families with autistic children. Where does this statistic come from? Are there details available on what kinds of research they fund? I'd like to make a point about research into genetics (and causes more generally, including pointless cause theories like vaccines) taking away money not only from programs to directly assist autistic people and their family, but also from research into what kinds of education/therapy help autistic children and adults learn and live best.
4. Fearmongering. It probably wouldn't take too much work to find some of their sensationalist advertisements, but I suppose some links wouldn't hurt.
Hmm, there are probably other points I could make, but these are what come to mind at the moment.
(I am not planning to say anything about why looking for a cure is problematic in itself; I think that would be too difficult to get across.)
_________________
Now convinced that I'm a bit autistic, but still unsure if I'd qualify for a diagnosis, since it causes me few problems. Apparently people who are familiar with the autism spectrum can readily spot that I'm a bit autistic, though.