Page 1 of 1 [ 4 posts ] 

sinsboldly
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Nov 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,488
Location: Bandon-by-the-Sea, Oregon

16 Feb 2009, 11:36 pm

HELENA - A bill asking that the State of Montana require insurance companies to cover autism treatments has made it out of a Senate committee in Helena.

Senate Bill 234, otherwise known as 'Brandon's Bill,' passed out of the Business, Labor and Economic Affairs Committee on a 6-5 vote on Monday.

Sponsored by Sen. Kim Gillan, D-Billings, SB 234 asks insurance companies to provide up to $50,000 a year for costs related to treatment of autism for children up to age eight and up to $20,000 a year for children nine years of age through age 18.

While the current statute requires coverage of mental illnesses, insurance companies often have been able to turn down treatments for autism - the most frequently prescribed being Applied Behavior Analysis therapy - on the basis that they are considered educational.

Proponents of the bill argued that ABA and other therapies are in fact medically based treatments and that there are huge amounts of evidence backing up that claim.

Insurance companies testified against the bill claiming that it would cause rates to go up for all customers, but proponents cited studies proving that any increased costs related to covering autism treatments are marginal.

SB 234 is expected on the floor for second reading this week.

http://www.missoulian.com/articles/2009 ... s/br74.txt


_________________
Alis volat propriis
State Motto of Oregon


cyberscan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Apr 2008
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,296
Location: Near Panama, City Florida

17 Feb 2009, 2:28 am

There will be a very simple way around that. Insurance companies will likely refuse to offer coverage for autistic people (unless coverage is mandated).


_________________
I am AUTISTIC - Always Unique, Totally Interesting, Straight Talking, Intelligently Conversational.
I am also the author of "Tech Tactics Money Saving Secrets" and "Tech Tactics Publishing and Production Secrets."


demeus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2007
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 738

17 Feb 2009, 6:19 am

OK, I will bit.

Yes, rates may go up for everyone if this bill passed BUT if we do not offer the treatments when the person is young and pay for it, the bill for everyone will be much higher because the time to attack is lost.

Again, this is more thinking about today and who cares about tomorrow when I do not have to deal with it anymore.



Maditude
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Dec 2008
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 850
Location: New Jersey, USA

17 Feb 2009, 9:33 am

demeus wrote:
OK, I will bit.

Yes, rates may go up for everyone if this bill passed BUT if we do not offer the treatments when the person is young and pay for it, the bill for everyone will be much higher because the time to attack is lost.

Again, this is more thinking about today and who cares about tomorrow when I do not have to deal with it anymore.


It will not go up for everybody. The insurance underwriters will assign a risk rate for autism and increase rates for those wishing autism protection according to the rate. It is similar whit that insurance companies do for diabetes right now.


_________________
"Everything was fine until I woke up."

"Vortex of Freedom" Radio Show
Saturdays 6PM Eastern - 5PM Central
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/maditude