auntblabby wrote:
do the martial arts have a policing organization that disciplines people who misuse the martial arts?
Each martial art has an organization, or several organizations that can handle issues of ethics, yes, but not nearly well enough enforced in my opinion. Money has a tendency to corrupt ethics. I see too many people open martial arts studios with fliers in the window guaranteeing that students will achieve a certain belt level in a certain time period. I don't think you will see that in Japan, Korea, or Okinawa. One of my first martial arts instructors was younger than me by 15 years and already a black belt and instructor. He bragged that he got into the martial arts because he like to fight. I left that dojo after that. To me, that is not a good teacher.
Most of my experience is studying the history and culture of martial arts. Reading books, biographies, not Black Belt magazine. I appreciate it for its art and culture. One man I used to work with and go to his home for dinners is a 7th dan black belt in Tae Kwon Do. He was the coach of the American team at the Pan Am games around 25 years ago. He was selected for that position from some Federation of Tae Kwon Do instructors.
The last martial arts school I attended was in Hapkido and I checked the credentials of the instructor through a few different National Hapkido organizations. I think a lot of people will get a black belt or not after taking classes for a short time, then go to some small town and just open a gym/dojo.
I have taken classes in Korea from Korean teachers and the whole method of training is different from what I see American teachers and even Korean teachers doing in the United States
The one Japanese judo studio I have taken classes at was totally different than any other martial arts studio I have ever seen, at least in the US.