"Your body can't tell the difference." (corn syrup

Page 2 of 3 [ 41 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

shrox
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Aug 2011
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,295
Location: OK let's go.

09 Feb 2012, 9:47 pm

MrXxx wrote:
1000Knives wrote:
MrXxx wrote:
shrox wrote:
FOS and inulin are found naturally in Jerusalem artichoke, burdock, chicory, leeks, onions, and asparagus....


I presume you meant "insulin?" ^^^^


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inulin

I don't think so.


Ah! Okay. New one on me. Interesting.


Inulin is insulin according the corn syrup lobby....(Not really Mr. Literal, it's just a pun, a bad one at that.)



MrXxx
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 May 2010
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,760
Location: New England

10 Feb 2012, 11:28 am

shrox wrote:
Inulin is insulin according the corn syrup lobby....(Not really Mr. Literal, it's just a pun, a bad one at that.)


What exactly are you insulinuating? :P

(inulinuating?...)


_________________
I'm not likely to be around much longer. As before when I first signed up here years ago, I'm finding that after a long hiatus, and after only a few days back on here, I'm spending way too much time here again already. So I'm requesting my account be locked, banned or whatever. It's just time. Until then, well, I dunno...


Dilbert
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Mar 2009
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,728
Location: 47°36'N 122°20'W

10 Feb 2012, 6:33 pm

emtyeye wrote:
Don't even get me started on the dangers of Aspartame and the other artificial sweeteners...


You have some lovely choices here....

The pink packet stuff is a proven cancer agent. (Saccharin, sold as Sweet'n Low.)

The light blue packet stuff is a neurotoxin. (This is aspartame, sold under brand name Equal.)

The yellow packet stuff causes GI issues. (Splenda, the newest of artificial sugars, chemists literally took a sugar molecule and replaced HO groups with Chlorine atoms.)

Guess who was in charge of Searle when they pushed aspartame approval through FDA? Donald effin Rumsfeld. Look it up.



MindWithoutWalls
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Oct 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,445
Location: In the Workshop, with the Toolbox

10 Feb 2012, 11:42 pm

I'm not sure how the food and drug industry can claim your body doesn't know one kind of sugar from another and, at the same time, openly make money off people who are lactose intolerant. Or is that such a totally different issue that I've just made myself sound really ignorant and silly?

Not a chemist or biologist here. Sorry...


_________________
Life is a classroom for a mind without walls.

Loitering is encouraged at The Wayshelter: http://wayshelter.com


artrat
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Nov 2011
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,269
Location: The Butthole of the American Empire

11 Feb 2012, 1:18 am

emtyeye wrote:
Don't even get me started on the dangers of Aspartame and the other artificial sweeteners...

That's actually quite false.

Sugars are worse for you than aspartame.


_________________
?During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act" ~George Orwell

"I belive in God, only I spell it Nature."
~ Frank Llyod Wright


shrox
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Aug 2011
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,295
Location: OK let's go.

11 Feb 2012, 1:20 am

artrat wrote:
emtyeye wrote:
Don't even get me started on the dangers of Aspartame and the other artificial sweeteners...

That's actually quite false.

Sugars are worse for you than aspartame.


Not at all true, where did you see or read this?



artrat
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Nov 2011
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,269
Location: The Butthole of the American Empire

11 Feb 2012, 1:40 am

shrox wrote:
artrat wrote:
emtyeye wrote:
Don't even get me started on the dangers of Aspartame and the other artificial sweeteners...

That's actually quite false.

Sugars are worse for you than aspartame.


Not at all true, where did you see or read this?

I learned this in nutrition class. For aspartame to be harmful you would have to digest more than an average human digests in a lifetime.


_________________
?During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act" ~George Orwell

"I belive in God, only I spell it Nature."
~ Frank Llyod Wright


ValentineWiggin
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 May 2011
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,907
Location: Beneath my cat's paw

11 Feb 2012, 1:44 am

artrat wrote:
shrox wrote:
artrat wrote:
emtyeye wrote:
Don't even get me started on the dangers of Aspartame and the other artificial sweeteners...

That's actually quite false.

Sugars are worse for you than aspartame.


Not at all true, where did you see or read this?

I learned this in nutrition class. For aspartame to be harmful you would have to digest more than an average human digests in a lifetime.


Right. Someone I knew refused to eat Aspartame (same someone would eat entire chickens as snacks and at 27 was on cholesterol medication, but I digress) and when asked why, he couldn't find any reason except a study done on rats that found if you forcefeed them enough aspartame for their stomachs to rupture, apparently, they die. The smear campaign has been debunked several times by health orgs and independent researchers.


_________________
"Such is the Frailty
of the human Heart, that very few Men, who have no Property, have any Judgment of their own.
They talk and vote as they are directed by Some Man of Property, who has attached their Minds
to his Interest."


nat4200
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jan 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 704
Location: BANNED

11 Feb 2012, 3:36 am

Redacted



Last edited by nat4200 on 19 Apr 2012, 6:42 am, edited 1 time in total.

MindWithoutWalls
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Oct 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,445
Location: In the Workshop, with the Toolbox

11 Feb 2012, 12:25 pm

nat4200 wrote:
Could it be a particular pesticide residue that is concentrated producing HFCS? Are there other explanations?


Now, that's worth considering. If people can be sensitive to soap residue on dishes, maybe concentrated pesticide residue is either a subtle taste sensitivity trigger or the cause of some sort of stomach reaction. I don't know. I'd say that might be something to look into.


_________________
Life is a classroom for a mind without walls.

Loitering is encouraged at The Wayshelter: http://wayshelter.com


shrox
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Aug 2011
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,295
Location: OK let's go.

11 Feb 2012, 2:49 pm

My number one reason for avoiding artificial sweeteners? No artificial "sweetener" tastes sweet to me.



shrox
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Aug 2011
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,295
Location: OK let's go.

11 Feb 2012, 2:51 pm

artrat wrote:
shrox wrote:
artrat wrote:
emtyeye wrote:
Don't even get me started on the dangers of Aspartame and the other artificial sweeteners...

That's actually quite false.

Sugars are worse for you than aspartame.


Not at all true, where did you see or read this?

I learned this in nutrition class. For aspartame to be harmful you would have to digest more than an average human digests in a lifetime.


That doesn't make it worse than sugar. Sugar has calories, the source of energy in food. Aspartame and other artificial sweeteners have no calories and are just molecules of junk!



GreyGirl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,429
Location: In the world of pure imagination

11 Feb 2012, 5:14 pm

Is there such a thing as low fructose corn sugar?



emtyeye
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Nov 2010
Age: 69
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,421
Location: Inner space

12 Feb 2012, 9:48 am

artrat wrote:
shrox wrote:
artrat wrote:
emtyeye wrote:
Don't even get me started on the dangers of Aspartame and the other artificial sweeteners...

That's actually quite false.

Sugars are worse for you than aspartame.


Not at all true, where did you see or read this?

I learned this in nutrition class. For aspartame to be harmful you would have to digest more than an average human digests in a lifetime.


Ok, here I go: the aspartame industry spends HUGE amounts of money to lie to the public about its product. Nutrition classes in a publicly funded (or even private) school would likely not know or tell the truth. There are TONS of scientific studies showing that aspartame, under all its names, is neuro-toxic and linked to all kinds of medical problems, especially blurry vision, seiziers, weight gain, and MS like symptoms. When the chemical was originally produced, it was considered by the Defense Department as a possible biological weapon. In fact, it is being used as such by being added to our food supply backed up by a steady stream of Industry lies. Why would they do such a thing? Mass capitalism cares only for money. Get people to pay to feed themselves poison, expecialy a slow acting one, and you make money at both ends, second time when they go to the doctor for drugs, most of which are other types of poison to create new problems that can then be "treated" with other, expensive (profitable) drugs.

When I worked in the nutrition field, my boss was addicted to diet soda. She tried and tried to quite but couldn't. Aspartame is addictive. One day she had a seizier in the office. Doctor could find no cause. Then one day she told me that when she was at University there was a professor who was documenting the dangers of aspertame and his house burned down and all his documentation was lost.

Google: Mission Possible, Betty Martini. She is a brave and self-less soul who has created a web-site where this information is available, including links to the 100s of studies that show this chemical to be poisonous. In one meta-analysis (a study looking at the results of a bunch of studies) EVERY study on the safety of apsertame NOT funded by industry showed deleterious results. EVERY study funded by the FDA or aspertame industry showed that it was safe.


_________________
Fiat justitia, ruat caelum.


emtyeye
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Nov 2010
Age: 69
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,421
Location: Inner space

12 Feb 2012, 10:00 am

Here is a link to Dr. Betty Martini's web site on the dangers of aspartame:
http://www.mpwhi.com/main.htm

It is a treasure trove of truth on the subject.


_________________
Fiat justitia, ruat caelum.


Ellendra
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 21 Dec 2011
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 127
Location: Wi, USA

13 Feb 2012, 12:09 am

artrat wrote:
emtyeye wrote:
Don't even get me started on the dangers of Aspartame and the other artificial sweeteners...

That's actually quite false.

Sugars are worse for you than aspartame.


Aspertame gives me bloody diarrhea, as do most artificial sweeteners. Sugar doesn't. I'll decide for myself which is more harmful.