more debate about women's faces/bodies

Page 12 of 12 [ 185 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

deltafunction
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jun 2012
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,094
Location: Lost

30 Jul 2012, 6:44 pm

ValentineWiggin wrote:
I'm sorry,
but I can't imagine an aesthetic LESS representative to me of "general health"
than that of the Hollywood female.


8O


By general health, I mean working out regularly, and eating healthy. That's pretty much standard in Hollywood.

And I'm not really sure what you think is so unhealthy about the aesthetic of a Hollywood female.



hyperlexian
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 22,023
Location: with bucephalus

30 Jul 2012, 7:54 pm

Kurgan wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
Kurgan wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
Kurgan wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
you seemed to think that injuries only occur from intense workouts, but that is not the case.

you seem to have a messed up[ idea of what is "ideal". if women are lusting after a certain body type, it would be considered ideal for men. many women like to look at male models in that way, as opposed to Hugh Jackman. and if you think it is easy for women to look like female models, then it would also be easy for men to look like male models. nothing "harder" there.


It's easy to reach a physique like some of the underwear models, but not the male actors. In movies aimed at both men and women, the guys look like Hugh Jackman or Christian Bale.

Scrawny male models is a recent phenomenon; take a look at the Calvin Klein shots of Mark Wahlberg roughly 15 years ago for comparison.

no, you are mistaking male idols for a male audience with males idols that women find attractive. movies supposedly aimed at women often feature actors with a much less developed physique. lots of women watch movies that are geared towards a male demographic, but movies geared towards a female demographic often have different types of men featured in them. for example, Bill Pullman in While You Were Sleeping or Billy Crystal in When Harry Met Sally do not feature overly muscular men.

also, many women do like how male models look.


And movies aimed at men do not feature stick thin fashion models, but usually a physique that is obtainable within months for most women.

Furthermore, a physique like Taylor Lautner is hard to achieve for a 17 year old.

glad to see you agree with me that men and women don't have different pressures put on them to look a certain way based on Hollywood ideals. the pressures are pretty much equivalent.


Not really. A phyisque like Kristen Stewart is more easilly available than a physique like Christian Bale.

Note that I've never claimed that women are under no pressure to look good; that pressure exists for everyone aged 8 to 50, regardless of gender. Women are under less pressure to be fit, though.

you're using examples of non-standard Hollywood males again. action/adventure idols are not the norm in Hollywood, and nobody expects and average man to look like that.

women are under the exact same pressure, it's just that the end result that they are supposed to aim for is different. don't you suppose that if it was easy for either males or females to reach those ideals, then... more average people would look like that? they don't, so there is your answer.


_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105


Kurgan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Apr 2012
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,132
Location: Scandinavia

31 Jul 2012, 7:51 am

hyperlexian wrote:
you're using examples of non-standard Hollywood males again. action/adventure idols are not the norm in Hollywood, and nobody expects and average man to look like that.

women are under the exact same pressure, it's just that the end result that they are supposed to aim for is different. don't you suppose that if it was easy for either males or females to reach those ideals, then... more average people would look like that? they don't, so there is your answer.


I never said it was extremely easy, I said it was within grasp for most women to reach the same body fat levels with little-to-no suffering in a matter of months. To actually have delicate facial features, rounded curves etc., a woman also needs good genetics. There are many women who are equally lean—even though it's not the norm.

If a man reaches the medically accepted ideal fat range, the tabloids will spread gossip on how he's gotten "fat".



hyperlexian
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 22,023
Location: with bucephalus

31 Jul 2012, 1:19 pm

Kurgan wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
you're using examples of non-standard Hollywood males again. action/adventure idols are not the norm in Hollywood, and nobody expects and average man to look like that.

women are under the exact same pressure, it's just that the end result that they are supposed to aim for is different. don't you suppose that if it was easy for either males or females to reach those ideals, then... more average people would look like that? they don't, so there is your answer.


I never said it was extremely easy, I said it was within grasp for most women to reach the same body fat levels with little-to-no suffering in a matter of months. To actually have delicate facial features, rounded curves etc., a woman also needs good genetics. There are many women who are equally lean—even though it's not the norm.

If a man reaches the medically accepted ideal fat range, the tabloids will spread gossip on how he's gotten "fat".

you are incorrect about the suffering, otherwise people would be that thin quite easily.

at any rate, your points are getting more and more farfetched (and not based on any discernibly factual reality), so i am not going to debate that further.


_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105


1000Knives
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jul 2011
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,036
Location: CT, USA

31 Jul 2012, 8:12 pm

Man, as a man I had no idea how much "no homo" I had to put myself through comparing myself to other men. Thanks Kurgan.

Anyway, I myself like the look of Olympic lifters in the middle weight classes. (No homo.) Anyway, I feel you on the injuries a bit, I personally avoid dips and benching for the reason you found out. That and I more or less don't care how much upper body mass I have, as most women just judge muscularness by bodyfat level. I prefer the OL lifter look as you look more just athletic, and to me it's a more symetrical and balanced looking physique. No homo again, lololol. But on the injury side of things, my knees are a bit screwy from ATG squatting, so I'm gonna have to lay off that and do some leg extensions on a machine, first to hypertrophy the VMO muscle, and also get some general quad hypertrophy, as I have a lot stronger glutes and hams than quads.

But, ladies, compound lifts. Seriously, unless you spend all your time doing bicep curls AND take drugs, you will not look like a weird hermaphroditic female bodybuilder. Women who do squats end up with marvelous looking legs and butts, and pretty much any weight exercises you do, you'll still look quite feminine as long as you keep your bodyfat in the feminine range (plus or minus 20%.)



Kurgan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Apr 2012
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,132
Location: Scandinavia

31 Jul 2012, 8:55 pm

1000Knives wrote:
Man, as a man I had no idea how much "no homo" I had to put myself through comparing myself to other men. Thanks Kurgan.

Anyway, I myself like the look of Olympic lifters in the middle weight classes. (No homo.) Anyway, I feel you on the injuries a bit, I personally avoid dips and benching for the reason you found out. That and I more or less don't care how much upper body mass I have, as most women just judge muscularness by bodyfat level. I prefer the OL lifter look as you look more just athletic, and to me it's a more symetrical and balanced looking physique. No homo again, lololol. But on the injury side of things, my knees are a bit screwy from ATG squatting, so I'm gonna have to lay off that and do some leg extensions on a machine, first to hypertrophy the VMO muscle, and also get some general quad hypertrophy, as I have a lot stronger glutes and hams than quads.

But, ladies, compound lifts. Seriously, unless you spend all your time doing bicep curls AND take drugs, you will not look like a weird hermaphroditic female bodybuilder. Women who do squats end up with marvelous looking legs and butts, and pretty much any weight exercises you do, you'll still look quite feminine as long as you keep your bodyfat in the feminine range (plus or minus 20%.)


You can do benching with rotator cuff problems if you're careful. Keep your arms at a 45 degree angle and hit the highest part of your chest with the bar, while at the same time keeping the tense in your abs during the entire lift. :) DO NOT lift with your arms all the way to the side, as this will force your rotator cuffs to bend beyond their natural motion path.

Apart from that, a very good post!



Kurgan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Apr 2012
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,132
Location: Scandinavia

31 Jul 2012, 8:58 pm

hyperlexian wrote:
Kurgan wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
you're using examples of non-standard Hollywood males again. action/adventure idols are not the norm in Hollywood, and nobody expects and average man to look like that.

women are under the exact same pressure, it's just that the end result that they are supposed to aim for is different. don't you suppose that if it was easy for either males or females to reach those ideals, then... more average people would look like that? they don't, so there is your answer.


I never said it was extremely easy, I said it was within grasp for most women to reach the same body fat levels with little-to-no suffering in a matter of months. To actually have delicate facial features, rounded curves etc., a woman also needs good genetics. There are many women who are equally lean—even though it's not the norm.

If a man reaches the medically accepted ideal fat range, the tabloids will spread gossip on how he's gotten "fat".

you are incorrect about the suffering, otherwise people would be that thin quite easily.

at any rate, your points are getting more and more farfetched (and not based on any discernibly factual reality), so i am not going to debate that further.


I don't suffer in college, yet most people don't have a degree in engineering. Most people don't have the same body fat levels as a Hollywood actress because they don't exercise--furthermore, most women don't have similar features because typically, Hollywood babes have high estrogen levels.



1000Knives
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jul 2011
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,036
Location: CT, USA

01 Aug 2012, 12:09 am

As far as body image expectations, my sport, figure skating, most of the guys doing it are ectomorphic, especially high level singles skaters. Pair skaters tend to be more bigger, but yeah. First time I saw a high level pair skater, I was like "holy crap, he's like Zangief from street fighter, because I saw him do a hold. One figure skater I know is also pretty jacked, don't know if he does pairs or not.

I think another thing too, look at like, Brian Boitano vs Johnny Wier. Brian Boitano seems to fit the mesomorph somatotype more, though.

Anyway, regarding benching, it's anecdotal, but in the 1950s and 60s when overhead pressing was king, nobody had rotator cuff problems. It's only after benching came about that rotator cuff problems became common, they used to only happen to baseball pitchers. And for what? Just some bigger chest muscles? Screw that. Arguably, the athletic carryover is slim, as you're always on your feet in athletics anyway, I guess it has some for lateral power, but yeah. I do do incline benching once in a blue moon, maybe I'll do more now that I'm in I guess an upper body "cycle." Personally too, though, from the bodybuilding standpoint, I like the look of bigger shoulders, rather than bigger pecs. People think chest chest chest so much, and I feel like shoulders are more important.



Kurgan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Apr 2012
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,132
Location: Scandinavia

01 Aug 2012, 7:56 am

1000Knives wrote:
As far as body image expectations, my sport, figure skating, most of the guys doing it are ectomorphic, especially high level singles skaters. Pair skaters tend to be more bigger, but yeah. First time I saw a high level pair skater, I was like "holy crap, he's like Zangief from street fighter, because I saw him do a hold. One figure skater I know is also pretty jacked, don't know if he does pairs or not.

I think another thing too, look at like, Brian Boitano vs Johnny Wier. Brian Boitano seems to fit the mesomorph somatotype more, though.

Anyway, regarding benching, it's anecdotal, but in the 1950s and 60s when overhead pressing was king, nobody had rotator cuff problems. It's only after benching came about that rotator cuff problems became common, they used to only happen to baseball pitchers. And for what? Just some bigger chest muscles? Screw that. Arguably, the athletic carryover is slim, as you're always on your feet in athletics anyway, I guess it has some for lateral power, but yeah. I do do incline benching once in a blue moon, maybe I'll do more now that I'm in I guess an upper body "cycle." Personally too, though, from the bodybuilding standpoint, I like the look of bigger shoulders, rather than bigger pecs. People think chest chest chest so much, and I feel like shoulders are more important.


Shoulder presses are underrated, but there is a reason for why most athletes do bench press, even where pec strength itself is irrelevant. If you do your shoulder presses behind your neck, they can indeed mess up your rotator cuffs.

Bench pressing has existed since the 19th century and personally, I messed up my rotator cuffs by doing dips, extremely wide grip pullups and similar exercises where you have to force the rotator cuffs to move unnaturally.