blueroses wrote:
I thought PDD didn't even exist as a diagnosis anymore, per the new DSM? Anyway, this really doesn't seem right to me. And, I don't mean 'right' in a moral sense, but more that I almost wonder if it was some sort of clerical error. Have you called them?
Hope you don't mind my answering this with a quote however I'm quoting their response somewhat (involved parties and insurer name left out):
Quote:
The health coverage for which you applied was reviewed by the Underwriting department.
Our decision was based on your answers to the health questions on the signed application, and/or additional information received pursuant to any telephone conversation(s). In accordance with our guidelines we are unable to approve your application due to __(My Name)__'s treatment for PDD by ___(Counselor's name) at __(Counselor's Work Group)__ per medical records.
'In accordance with our guidelines'. The only thing I can think of is that there were apparently some major mandates passed in 2012 involving 48 states with regard to healthcare coverage for autistic individuals and that some rather heavy-handed 'thou shalts' might have been pushed at the insurers. If that's the cause of this my only hope for coverage, aside from having the federal government taking hold of my health and perhaps right to live as I'd chose, is to get another job and fall in line with the group plan. If it turns out to be such a sour pill that it would jump the group rate up however and my employer refused to cover me - I'm not sure what I'd do, just pay the Affordable Healthcare Act fines as they escalate?