RaspberryFrosty wrote:
Like I stated before I wasn't diagnosed with hyperlexia but my test scores from things like the Iowa tests (if anyone remembers those) had high scores on grammar and vocabulary, followed by a lower than average score on reading comprehension, and an extremely low score on the mathematics section.
I'm not sure if any of those would indicate hyperlexia at all, though.
It can't be diagnosed from these sorts of tests. It's not just your test scores, it's the way you read, and how (and when) you learned to read. If you learned to read at the normal age using the normal methods, you are not hyperlexic. If you learned to read early without being taught in the normal way, then you probably are. In my case, I was 3 years old when I decided to start reading (though I don't remember it). My mother claims that she "taught" me, but my father laughs at this and says that all she did was answer my questions when there was a particularly strange or difficult spelling, and otherwise I taught myself. He thinks I figured out what sound each letter made based on the alphabet song and from watching Sesame Street, and deduced the rest on my own.
My earliest memory of reading was at age 5 when I was trying to read a poetry book and was getting frustrated because I didn't recognize some of the words and was therefore unable to pronounce them. By this point my parents were so used to me reading on my own that they didn't feel like helping me, just called over "sound it out like you always do" without looking at what I was doing.