Orwell wrote:
Mysty wrote:
Orwell wrote:
Mysty wrote:
You claim to be responding to my points, but you've ignored my point that gender is about more than being male or female.
Actually, I've just explicitly rejected that claim. To me, gender is just a genetically determined physiological characteristic. It has traditionally held implications for a person's role in society, I'll grant that, but I don't see those aspects as being integral to what gender someone is.
No one put you in charge of the English language.
No one put you in charge either.
In general, people working in the natural sciences conform to the definition I've used for gender (male or female) and people in the social sciences tend to use the definition you do. I tend to be biased towards the natural sciences and hold the social sciences in low regard.
You're retort at the beginning seems pointless, since you admit that I'm accurately reporting how the word "gender" is used and that the meaning you previously insisted on is only on way it's used, not the only way. (Replying not to further discuss the word, but simply because I found the response odd.)
_________________
not aspie, not NT, somewhere in between
Aspie Quiz: 110 Aspie, 103 Neurotypical.
Used to be more autistic than I am now.